Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Witchcraft all the way...


ollypenrice

Recommended Posts

This nearly died the death. The FSQ85 with reducer couldn't control great flares from Rigel out of shot but I had some data Tom took in it without the reducer in his 11 meg so I put that underneath and erased my artefacts. Had to artificially flatten Tom's data in Pixinsight. Great programme. No darks either for the Tom data but AstroArt 5's Sigma popped out a pretty clean image.

Then I had to get the colour without the reducer in a 2 panel mosaic so I used the OSC camera and got a couple of all nighters for it. There were big gradients from Rigel but again Pixinsight could do it.

Getting any star colour was like getting blood out of a stone. Don't know why.

So this is 16.5 hours (9.5 lum in the mono and 7 in the OSC). Since the Witch is embedded in the collapsed side of Barnard's Loop it will be good to get an Ha layer to bring something to the background sky but that will be for later.

Olly

WITCHEAD-WEB-X2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking good as always Olly...is there a tint of ha in the nebula ...?

Nadeem.

This was with the Baby Q, Nadeem. It's gigantic, the Witch. Yes, there is Ha in the region and the best images have an Ha layer which this will be getting if I'm spared.

Harry, yes, why does everone present this the wrong way up? Is it mainly S hemisphere imagers who shoot it? I think the visual balance is far better N up. It gives the impression of fizzling out when it's S up.

Francis, yes again, there is something limp-wristed about the colour! The Ha should 'magenta it up' a bit...

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering if Rigel's gradient is still present in the star colour (i.e. the gradient is removed from the background but not from the stars for some strange reason).

Have you looked at the spectra sensitivity of the sensor and the transmission spectra of each of the filters? Maybe mapping those into a corrective colour map could help - I know Neil (NL) played with this previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering if Rigel's gradient is still present in the star colour (i.e. the gradient is removed from the background but not from the stars for some strange reason).

Have you looked at the spectra sensitivity of the sensor and the transmission spectra of each of the filters? Maybe mapping those into a corrective colour map could help - I know Neil (NL) played with this previously.

Not a clue how I'd do that! The stars in this region don't seem to show much colour so I had to milk what there was. There is still one patch (upper left of the main nebula) in which I really recorded minimal star colour and failed to tease any out. I'm intrigued by this.

I hope an Ha layer will bring something to the background.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You HAVE to turn her the other way up Olly!!

Great stuff. Rigel does its utmost to spoil things as you say, but this is a great example.

I have just noted the other day that I can actually image this from home, but i'm not holding out any hope of catching much of that dust.

Cheers

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got round to blending in my telescopic Witch to my 85mm camera lens mosaic of Orion from last year. I only added it at a low percentage opacity to keep it looking natural but it makes a slight improvement, I think.

You can see the amount of Ha in the region and the need to get a good layer to finish the Witch Head properly.

Olly

ORION-V6-L.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.