Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Sky at Night


101nut

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

With a lump of matter like that traveling at that kind of speed I wonder what kind of crater it would cause on a planet/moon (with and without an atmosphere).

I would imagine most any and most all bodies sort of Mars sized and up would have an atmosphere of some kind ? .. too much gravity not too really I'd have thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎14‎/‎09‎/‎2016 at 08:53, DaveS said:

TBH, I think their schedule was scuppered by the wretched Olympics :cussing:. BBC4 was totally saturated, end even BBC2 was infected.

I think to be fair,BBC1 had its fair share of coverage with the Olympics.

What these people achieve with such severe disabilities amazes me,and I for one support and watch them wholeheatedly.

I can catch up on a programme later.

Mick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick, it was the Olympics I was talking about, saturation coverage on BBC1, (Apart from Eastenders of course :angryfire:, can't have that interrupted, can we :angryfire:?), BBC4 (Where S @ N airs first) and even infecting BBC2. The Paralympics are on Ch.4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pippy said:

How do we go from the sky at night to the olympics in so few postings ?

 

I believe it was you who mentioned it has been a while since you saw s&n and other members obliged by explaining why

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Scott said:

I believe it was you who mentioned it has been a while since you saw s&n and other members obliged by explaining why

You might be right !    but then, I myself don't believe the two are connected in any way shape or form.

I believe the olympics may be an excuse, but not the reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DaveS said:

Mick, it was the Olympics I was talking about, saturation coverage on BBC1, (Apart from Eastenders of course :angryfire:, can't have that interrupted, can we :angryfire:?), BBC4 (Where S @ N airs first) and even infecting BBC2. The Paralympics are on Ch.4.

Sorry Dave,my humble apologies,you were quite right.

Note to self(Read thread more carefully).

Mick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be a well made structure to cope with that acceleration. Approx 10g for 10 ten minutes (if my maths are right - doubtful), and as said above, how do you slow down enough to do anything useful when you get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MarkMayf said:

It would be a well made structure to cope with that acceleration. Approx 10g for 10 ten minutes (if my maths are right - doubtful), and as said above, how do you slow down enough to do anything useful when you get there.

10 g would be fine for electronics you can fit them inside a shell fired from a canon, 20000 g is probably survivable.

Alan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they would need to nor intend to slow down - they would use on board cameras and other em senors to sense and report back local conditions (much in the way Voyager is presently doing).  I really don't think that there can be any serious attempt to "steer" the craft especially into any orbit.  Of course the thing is so far fetched that I may well be completely wrong - won't be the first time :icon_biggrin:

 

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.