Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

NGC7331 L-Ha/R-G-B


MikeD

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

Bagged some colour and Ha for this over the last two nights, to add to the luminance I already processed.

L = 54@ 300 secs

R = 8 @ 300 sec's

G = 6 @ 390 secs

B = 8 @ 420 sec's

Ha 12 @ 600 sec's

The Ha and Red was mixed 50/50 before processing.

the Ha regions are just starting to show through but I need more (this was processed while shooting more Ha).

Shot with the usual set up, 10" newt and HX916 CCD.

Thanks for looking.

Mike.

miked-albums-mikes-images-2-picture13727-ngc7331-lrgb-good3.jpg

post-13376-13387766951_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cracking image. It's really nice to see some of your images being posted again!

x2!

I really like the framing of this one, too. It's unconventional, what with being a portrait image of a horizontally oriented galaxy, but it really works well, particularly because of all the little babies above it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again thanks all for the very kind comments.:)

It's unconventional, what with being a portrait image of a horizontally oriented galaxy, but it really works well, particularly because of all the little babies above it.
Thanks, all my images are always shot north up but as I felt this galaxy displays better in it's Horizontal plane I rotated the image 90 degrees clockwise.

I have now had a chance to add the extra Ha data I shot for this target to the Ha I already had.

I have added this new (18 @ 600 sec's) Ha stack to the Red channel of the L-Ha/r-G-b as a lighten layer.

The result is better dust lane colour in the core I think and a touch more of the Ha regions coming through.

Mike.

miked-albums-mikes-images-2-picture13878-ngc7331-lrgb-good5.jpg

yfronto-albums-mikes-images-2-picture13878-ngc7331-lrgb-good5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The detail you've captured is simply staggering from a focal length of just over a metre. I wouldn't have thought it possible but you've done it. I dare say you found the core a bit of a devil? I did it in two stretches because it's so bright relative to the rest.

Did the Ha contribute much to the detail? If so I think I'd better go and get some!!

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Olly.:)

The core is always an issue for me, I did do it in two processes and I could have preserved the detail right to the core with that separate processed layer but in my opinion it loses the reality of a bright glowing core relative to the rest of the galaxy, so I still let it burn a little.

The Ha is a must for me as I use the Ha data as a LP filter for the red data. By the time I balance the background to kill the Lp in a straight RGB image it has lost nearly all it's faint red data. Mixing the raw red and raw Ha 50/50 kills the Lp and at the same time enhances the Ha regions.

I tend not to use the Ha with the luminance, maybe I should give it a go.

I think Ha is always a good idea When imaging galaxies it seems to help the final result pop, not sure if that would apply to imaging from your dark skies though.

Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.