Lurker Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Hi, I'm interested in getting a webcam probably next week, There isn't much threads about webcam. So I figured that i'll just start a new thread so i can get the right webcam for my scope.At the moment, I currently have SkyQuest Orion XT8" Classic dob. I don't have any budget at all, I would like a very good webcam. What accessories do I also need to put my webcam into the Eyepiece?Do I need another Eyepiece for a webcam? Just let me know what I need. Cheers.* Waits for jahmanson * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pvaz Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 I would say 90% go with the philips SPC900 or the older SPC880 (with firmware upgrade to the SPC900 version).I bought one 2nd hand for 15£ but I'm yet to try it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowan46 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 these are the cheapest place, they do the adaptor too Cheap Philips SPC880 webcam - 49269 - discounts & offers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave S Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The webcam just needs an adapter then fits straight into where the eyepiece would go. No eyepiece is needed.Dave... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightfisher Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 as said with a webcam you need an adaptor/nosepiece, you have to carefully remove the silver focus ring and then the black plastic "barrel" complete with original lens, this unscrews and the nosepiece screws into same place as lens, its a good idea to get the IR/UV filter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted January 15, 2011 Author Share Posted January 15, 2011 Ok thanks, is there not a better webcam out there? As for removing, I'll have a look at YouTube, I'm sure there is a tutorial explaining what to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightfisher Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 i think a few people have been trying microsoft HD webcams but the philips is still regarded as one of the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pvaz Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Ok thanks, is there not a better webcam out there? There are specialized ones, but the price rises fast:Imaging Source Cameras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted January 15, 2011 Author Share Posted January 15, 2011 I have been reading about modification web cameras, Wondering what's the best decision to make? What's the different between normal webcam and modify one? Does modify one give you better details pictures, if not what will give better pictures in details of Jupiter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rols Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 well from what i read there is no real way to use a non modded webcam, you ahve to change the nose piece to connect it to your scope! there are some good threads about the Philips on this site if you do a search.Rols Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowan46 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 generally the term modded webcam refers to a long exposure modification made available to the astro community by steve chambers. this gives the toucam and its derivatives some facility for deep sky imaging. you are correct that modding is the term for making modifications to a webcam so technically fitting a nosepiece into a webcam is a mod. but often if you come across the term modded it means altered for long exposure myself and many others forget to put lx in front of the word mod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowan46 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 sorry about the last post its c a r p an ordinary webcam gives great pics of jupiter just capture the frames and stack. An ir filter on the webcam will help clean it up a bit it can look a little bit of a dirty brown without one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The term Modified webcam tends to refer to long exposure (LX) mod, there are a few different stages to the mod. The first is just LX which is called SC1, the next stage is usually referred to as SC1.5 and that's the LX mod and Amp off.Then you can go for SC2 which is the above plus active cooling (usually a fan), then lastly the SC3 is everything above plus a mono more sensitive chip.The Phillips webcams ToUcam and ToUcam II and now the SPC900 are generally regarded as the best, but I've seen cracking images taken with others... Here is some images that I took with a ToUcam SC1 - for the planets the LX mod was turned off (so effectively off the shelf cam)...These were taken with a 8" F5 Newt.I also managed to take some images with the LX mod through the same telescope...Apologies for that last image - I can only seem to find the thumbnail - the larger one is better, but only a little. So as you can see the Phillips webcams are capable little cams. Excellent value for money and without moving up to the DMK's, I doubt you'll find better. For DSO imaging they are a good start, but you'll soon want more...CheersAnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted January 15, 2011 Author Share Posted January 15, 2011 Cheers guysAnt, love the Saturn picture, that's the kind of pictures I like to learn to take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 In that case rest assured if you get one of the SPC900's (or the SPC880 are pretty much the same so I've read) - that is the sort of image that you could get.CheersAnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brantuk Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 I have an SPC900 mod'ed for LE - it's the 1.5 mod with amp off, cooling and the more sensitive chip - it's not a cheap option mind you. Have a look at Astronomiser website - everything you need to know about modding webcams and dslr's and lots of advice for AP generally:Astronomiser - Automated Astronomy and AstroImaging SolutionsIf you need to know more give Andy a ring - very nice chap and full of good info and advice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningMajor Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 I've got a Celestron 127SLT and they do a Neximage Solar System Imager, however I;ve heard that it's basically the same as a SPC900 but costs nearly £140 - I know it copmes with software, but this does seem a bit costly - anyone used it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowan46 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 I have a neximage. the spc 900's that have just started coming around are a recent find last year you couldn't find one for love nor money my guess is when they're gone there will be a shortage again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brantuk Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 I agree with MorningMajor - I have the Neximage cam too and it's the same chip as the SPC900. What makes it expensive is the astro friendly housing, provision of software, and brand naming. If I hadn't been "astronomically" young and naiive at the time I might have only purchased the SPC lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningMajor Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 hi Rowan46Is the neximage any good - whats the software like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielson23uk Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The term Modified webcam tends to refer to long exposure (LX) mod, there are a few different stages to the mod. The first is just LX which is called SC1, the next stage is usually referred to as SC1.5 and that's the LX mod and Amp off.Then you can go for SC2 which is the above plus active cooling (usually a fan), then lastly the SC3 is everything above plus a mono more sensitive chip.AntHi Ant,What is the AMP your refer to in the SC1.5 and why is it turned off?ThanksDanPS. Apologies for carving up your original post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted January 15, 2011 Author Share Posted January 15, 2011 In that case rest assured if you get one of the SPC900's (or the SPC880 are pretty much the same so I've read) - that is the sort of image that you could get.CheersAntModified or non modified? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowan46 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 the neximage does the job but had I been able to source one of the phillips ones at the time I was buying I would have got one of those. I got mine second hand and to be honest its not at the moment worth the price they ask, all the software you need is available for free on the web. however as I said in a few months there won't be any more phillips as I understand that they have stopped making them and that these are all found stock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brantuk Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Both cams in basic form produce good results on solar system objects. Both can be modified and Ant's M51 above shows whats possible with the LE mods.Amp Off - the sensor chip can suffer "amp glow" or "electroluminessence" from chip circuitry, resulting in a "light pollution" effect seen in exposures. Reducing the voltage to the chip will reduce the effect during long exposure. See here for full article:Webcam Mods Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted January 15, 2011 Author Share Posted January 15, 2011 Philips SPC900NC uncoveredThis url explains how it's done, I wouldn't even try it myself. I'm clueless really. but it's a very interesting read though.Wondering if I should get modded verison or unmodded? any different in quality of pictures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.