Martin 2 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 Taken with C8 and coolpix 4300 on camera bracket, 1minute exposure single shot , its shakey because I can only get long exposure by holding down the button for the lenght of the exposure, have to get a remote thingy,Played with in photo shopM2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin 2 Posted April 5, 2006 Author Share Posted April 5, 2006 still hasnt come outM2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 still hasnt come outM2The tag didn't have the first "[", fixed now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin 2 Posted April 5, 2006 Author Share Posted April 5, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin 2 Posted April 5, 2006 Author Share Posted April 5, 2006 thanks GazM2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 Showing here Martin looks good too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaptain Klevtsov Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 The only thing that I can see wrong is that you spelt length wrong. The image is a corker seeing as you did it all "wrong". Get the remote thingy immediately! We can all see the potential in this, keep at it mate and you'll get some cracking images.Under the circumstances is the phrase that comes to mind.Can you do 15, 20 or even 30 sec exposures without holding the button? Asking because, if you can get a bunch of images that are too dim, you can "add them up" in Registax (free) to get around your lack of Hubble tackle. Even 5 second images would, I think, add up to a "wow" image.Liking where this is going!Captain Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin 2 Posted April 6, 2006 Author Share Posted April 6, 2006 Thanks C.CYes I can get up to an 8 sec. exposure and trigger it with a timer, have to give your idea a tryM2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CELESCOPE Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 well done Martin, that is a goos size image and given taking the shake out would have been a very nice image , onwards and upwards then .Rog glad the scope is ok now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geppetto Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 MartinWithout the shake, they're going to be great images.Just a thought, can you rig up a device to hold the button downso that you can let go of the camera during the take.When a minute or so has passed, block the scope with a black card or somethingwhilst you release the device holding the button Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CELESCOPE Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 yup the black card and release is how i started off works a treat.Rog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinB Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 Martin, I think a 1 minute exposure may be too long assuming you are using the scope in alt az mode. Although the scope will track very well it won't rotate. Best to limit the exposure to 45 secs esp if you aren't using a focal reducer. Mainly shake but you could be starting to get some rotation. That said Martin, there's a lot to be excited about in that image and it's not far off at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 Actually, I like that!!A really good start Martin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 I like that too and imagine what it will look like with a remote thingy?Russ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin 2 Posted April 6, 2006 Author Share Posted April 6, 2006 Thanks Folks, Ive just picked up from a diy store a plastic clamp which has a lock on it, as you close it on what ever your clamping it locks at that pressure, it has a release catch in the handle ( the sort of thing you use to clamp bits of wood together etc), just tried it on the camera and it works a treat £5.00 as apposed to 70 for the remote THINGYThanks for the tipM2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 Good luck with the clamp thingy hope it means you dont have to spend 70 quid on a remote thingy James thingy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin 2 Posted April 6, 2006 Author Share Posted April 6, 2006 Thanks ERRRR thingyM2 ingy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 Not bad mate considering you still need to get a thingy! Had a play myself with the image - looks nice, get a few of those (maybe limit to 30sec) and stack them and I think you'll be suprised whast come out!Tried to remove some of the star trails (using layers) and then levels and a little curves to bring the detail out.In the process I got a strange purple colour - sorry about that Ant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted April 6, 2006 Share Posted April 6, 2006 Seeing as Ant did a good job on the trails ive removed the purple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin 2 Posted April 6, 2006 Author Share Posted April 6, 2006 Cheers Guys, they are great, must have a bit more patience and get to grips with registax and photo shop.M2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.