Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the heads up, Jeremy. Could I ask how to use the chart in the link? I’ve often tried and failed to translate those type of charts into something I could relate back to SkySafari. I struggle to identify the larger stars to the find the equivalent star field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Littleguy80 said:

Thanks for the heads up, Jeremy. Could I ask how to use the chart in the link? I’ve often tried and failed to translate those type of charts into something I could relate back to SkySafari. I struggle to identify the larger stars to the find the equivalent star field. 

It's half a degree south of open cluster M52. Quite easy to find when using the right side of Cassiopeia's W as pointers.

Edit: here's a zoomable DSS map centered on the correct location.

Edited by Waddensky
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Littleguy80 said:

Thanks for the heads up, Jeremy. Could I ask how to use the chart in the link? I’ve often tried and failed to translate those type of charts into something I could relate back to SkySafari. I struggle to identify the larger stars to the find the equivalent star field. 

Simple way as @Waddensky says: just S of M52.

The way to locate is to use the variable star chart link I sent. When that displays there is a link that says Plot Another Chart. You can then choose the scale you prefer. If you chose chart scale A you get this 15 deg view. You can compare that chart with a star atlas and see that the brightest star (marked 23, i.e. mag 2.3) is beta Cas, and star 35 (mag 3.5) is iota Cep.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Littleguy80 said:

All excellent, that helps a lot. Thank you both very much! Looking clear early on this evening so hopefully will get a chance to try and spot this :) 

Hope you get it Neil :smiley:

Not looking clear at all here otherwise I'd be planning to do just the same.

Thanks for the "Heads up" Jeremy :thumbright:

Hopefully it will stay bright enough to observer for a few days.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just went out with the 10x50 and I found the nova! It's easy to locate using the rhombus-shaped asterism including 4 Cas, its minor axis points roughly to Nova Cas 2021, close to HD 220819 (mag 6.6) and a bit farther from M52. I am no variable star observer by a long shot, but to my eyes, it looked brighter than HD 220770 (mag 7.8) but not as bright as HD 220167 (7.2).

Edited by Waddensky
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Waddensky said:

Just went out with the 10x50 and I found the nova! It's easy to locate using the rhombus-shaped asterism including 4 Cas, its minor axis points roughly to Nova Cas 2021, close to HD 220819 (mag 6.6) and a bit farther from M52. I am no variable star observer by a long shot, but to my eyes, it looked brighter than HD 220770 (mag 7.8) but not as bright as HD 220167 (7.2).

That’s excellent. Well done 👍🏻 

I was thinking that rhombus might be a good indicator 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you lot are better than me! I’m in the right field, I think, with the 150p and I’m blowed if I can identify it. Any pointers on this chart appreciated! Newt view, 2.2 degree field

28C949B5-EB21-4422-8E2D-C6587EF8C804.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, davhei said:

Here is an aavso-chart of the same area. Note the long chain of stars-asterism at 7 o’clock.

The nova forms a nice triangle with the 90 and 91 stars.

5FBD0140-9B79-4828-AB9A-B8F434C43F0E.png

Thanks very much, that’s a very useful chart and confirms I did see it 👍👍

To me it looked the same brightness as HD220720 which is mag 7.8.

M52 was basically invisible to me at low power in the 150p with 24mm Panoptic. Popping a 12.5mm BGO in allowed me to see it with averted  vision, and going to 6mm helped a little more but it still required averted vision for the stars to pop nicely into view. Limiting magnitude through the scope with the 24mm was somewhere around mag 9.9 I think, whilst most of the M52 stars are 10. something or dimmer.

Nice to have caught the Nova at the first opportunity. Thanks very much @JeremyS for the heads up! 👍👍

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.