Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

EQ6-R owners club


mikey2000

Recommended Posts

Droogie,

Your setup sounds very similar to mine as I use EQMOD and SGP with my EQ6-R.  With the mount connected to the laptop via the EQ direct cable I don't bother with any star alignment.  After polar aligning with SharpcapPro and returning the mount to the 'home/park' position, I simply start SGP, connect to the mount and run the sequence. It slews fairly close to the target, plate solves to within my pre-defined error limit and done.  SGP will then automatically sync the final position back to EQMOD and any subsequent slews are usually spot on.

If your EQ6-R is anything like mine you will love the results.  Last Friday I was able to use the mount under near perfect conditions, with no wind and better than our usual poor seeing conditions.  With my 32lbs of scope + cameras the mount averaged 0.53 arcsec RMS over a 4 hour period according to PHD2.  Can't really ask for more than that.

Scott

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your post. that's given me great reassurance.

Last night I ran some tests to simulate my current routine and the mount appeared to behave exactly as I wanted it to. Obviously I cannot perform a plate solve inside but it gave confidence that I am on the right path. 

A couple of questions though.

I will be buying the EQ Direct cable soon but even with the handset /cable how do you tell the mount the date and time? I guess this is what I have entered into EQ Mod already? 
The handset knows my latitude /longitude is that also passed to the mount itself?

Secondly the handset keeps asking me about Polar co-ordinates which I have just entered through, is that okay as I will be Polar aligning with my Polemaster?

Lastly the manual keeps referring to Alignment points. But I see no alignment points in the Alignment Point List Editor window. Is this simply because I have not added any and I wont need to add any as I will be using Plate Solving?

That RMS figure sounds great. My current setup is way below half the weight of yours so hopefully I will be able to achieve the same sort of values. Hopefully will post results when I get some clear skies.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For my mount i use one of these connected into my USB hub and it works great.

I did have one small issue at first as I had the USB dongle for my wireless mouse plugged into the hub next to this and it did not like it as could not acquire satellites.  I probably should have thought of that before I plugged it all up that way, being a comms engineer and all.  Diagnosed my stupidity quite quickly, so not all bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/01/2019 at 11:17, Droogie 2001 said:

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your post. that's given me great reassurance.

Last night I ran some tests to simulate my current routine and the mount appeared to behave exactly as I wanted it to. Obviously I cannot perform a plate solve inside but it gave confidence that I am on the right path. 

A couple of questions though.

I will be buying the EQ Direct cable soon but even with the handset /cable how do you tell the mount the date and time? I guess this is what I have entered into EQ Mod already? 
The handset knows my latitude /longitude is that also passed to the mount itself?

Secondly the handset keeps asking me about Polar co-ordinates which I have just entered through, is that okay as I will be Polar aligning with my Polemaster?

Lastly the manual keeps referring to Alignment points. But I see no alignment points in the Alignment Point List Editor window. Is this simply because I have not added any and I wont need to add any as I will be using Plate Solving?

That RMS figure sounds great. My current setup is way below half the weight of yours so hopefully I will be able to achieve the same sort of values. Hopefully will post results when I get some clear skies.

Thanks

Droogie,

I believe EQMOD gets the date/time from the laptop and uses that.  I don't use the handset at all, so I can't say what if any data it can pass to EQMOD when connected through the handset.  I can say that when using the EQDirect cable you must enter the lat/long of your observing site into EQMOD.  It will persist the location you enter so you only need to do that once unless you change your observing site location. 

As for the Alignment points I believe those would populate if you did a normal star alignment and synced the location with EQMOD.  As you say you will not need to do that as long as you are plate solving to the target via SGP.  You have several options in terms of what plate solver SGP uses, which one have you chosen?  I use the locally installed ansvr since I don't have internet at my observing site.  It has worked very well for me:

https://adgsoftware.com/ansvr/

Clear skies and let us know how it goes.

Thanks,

Scott

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Scott.,

I managed to get out last night and test the mount. Other than a few niggles such as new SGP profiles needing filter wheels re-adding (my fault) then things pretty well.

Following my usual routine I Polar Aligned though the Elevation bolts namely the spring loaded one is interesting. When I wanted to come further down in degrees I loosened it off but found I needed to manually move the mount forward to actually bring the elevation down if that makes sense. I should re-read the manual as I didn't spend a lot of time on this, anyway I got good PA.

After focusing I used the handset and typed in dates and time (having to keep remember putting handset into EQ Direct mode!) Elevation was already there just entered through Polar Alignment section. Said No to align.

Plate Solved at Polaris area. Then opened SGP and used a Slew now to get to rough area. Then used Center Now. First plate solve was out as normal, Second attempt was spot on, I think it was a single pixel out! Normally on AVX I had a max of 28 pixels so that was encouraging. 
BTW I am using Plate Solve 2 (no Internet access) and I have ANSVR setup with local copy as you describe. I find Plate Solve 2 always works.

Began PHD and configured guiding. Despite changing the PHD profile to the new mount some of the settings were clearly not correct compared to the old AVX. Namely calibration steps. After I received "Star not move enough" I checked the Brain icon and noted this was recommending a way high value than previously, 6100 whereas it would have been around 700. Re-ran and this time it worked.
Guiding started off woeful. Kept changing settings and by the end of the night I was around 0.90RMS. However much of the evening was way, way above this.
My payload is only 16 pounds. The values I ended up with were as below.

I suspect I will need to fine tune these but if you have any suggestions on value then that would be much appreciated. Not had to play around with PHD2 values for a while and I now remember how challenging it can be to get the best results.
All in all a good night. Everything worked but needs fine tuning.

PHD Profile with EQ6 Last settings.PNG

Edited by Droogie 2001
Wrong image uploaded
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Droogie,

I sounds like the mount was not responding enough per PHD2 command as my calibration step is set to 600.  Check your ASCOM PulseGuide settings in EQMOD by clicking the icon of the wrench with three red >>> symbols.  My RA and DEC rates are x0.50, min pulse width of 20 and a DEC backlash of 0.   

If you change any of these values you will need to force a PHD2 re-calibration.  Another thing to try is running the PHD2 'Guiding Assistant'.  It will evaluate your setup and suggest setting changes to improve it.

Hope this helps.

Scott

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Droogie - I'd say your Dec guiding is reasonable, if a little spikey.  The RA could do with some tweaking.   Definitely set  0.5x guide rate in EqMod (its the default) then use the New Equipment wizard in PHD2 to start a brand new fresh setup.  Make sure you get the correct details (pixel size, focal lenght etc)  then do a calibration near Dec=0.

For what it's worth, in my suburban location, I get best results from a 3s exposure and the following settings.    I used the PHD2 Guide Assisant (leave it running at least 5 mins) to suggest the minimum move values (and then lowered them further to 0.08 from the suggested 0.1 ? )   I tweaked The hystersis and aggression settings and this seemed to smooth things out a bit.

RA guide algorithm = Hysteresis, Hysteresis = 0.250, Aggression = 0.600, Minimum move = 0.080
Dec guide algorithm = Resist Switch, Minimum move = 0.080 Aggression = 50% FastSwitch = enabled

 

Those exact settings probably won't work for your AOG setup (I use a 180mm focal length guide scope) but it shows where you could try makeing some adjustments.

 

If you are feeling really fancy, you can enable autopec in eqmod, to cancel out any PEC in the mount.  It's hardly worth the bother though - my copy of the Eq6-r has only a few arcsecs of periodic error and it's easily guided out over a long, lazy steady error cycle.  (Unlike my old EQ3 with had a 19 second periodic sawtooth error - nasty!)

 

 

If you get really stuck submit a guide log (preferably including a calibration run and Guide Assistant run) to the PHD2 support group (on google groups).  They are *very* knowledgeable...

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HI Guys, i'm so happy to find such a great Club for everyone who OWN this awesome EQ6-R and share our experiences here. 

i'm 31 y.o , living in Germany and new to DSO-Photography.

 i started to search for little Mount enough to handle my DSLR (Cannon, 77D) and maybe some big lenses, but i realized: there a lot to see up there and why not to get something bigger and nicer. i started to read and search (literally for weeks!). now ,i  just ordered this big guy and expecting it to come at the end of this Week ?. my next step is to order the Telescope: it's a 10" F/4 Newton weights about 15kg, https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/ts-optics-telescope-n-254-1016-photon-ota/p,58539#tab_bar_1_select .

now my question is:

What else I need (as a beginner)  to make a good Photos of Objects , which require basic level of experience and also not too heavy for this mount?

  I'm asking because i've already reached the limits of my Budget for the next months ? 

 

Thank you guys

Edited by OJ87
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcom OJ87.  I'm sure you will love the mount.    That is a very serious telescope!  At F4, you will need to pay careful attention to the collimation (do you have the right accessories/skills to check that?)

At 1000mm focal length, I'm quite sure you will be buying some guiding equipment.  Unguided, the eq6-r seems to have about +/- 6arc second periodic errors, repeating over about 8 minutes.  This will give you long or egg shaped stars once you start to go past 30 second exposures and you will need spot-on polar alignment.    I guide my 1000mm focal length scope with a small guide camera inserted in the 9x50 guidescope (with suitable adapter) and it works a treat.  

 

If you are a true beginner, I'd probably suggest a smaller, less demanding scope (eg 150PDS) and save a few euros to see if you need to buy some guiding equipement. (guide camera, laptop, EQdirect cable, guidescope/finderscope adapter etc).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mikey2000 said:

Welcom OJ87.  I'm sure you will love the mount.    That is a very serious telescope!  At F4, you will need to pay careful attention to the collimation (do you have the right accessories/skills to check that?)

At 1000mm focal length, I'm quite sure you will be buying some guiding equipment.  Unguided, the eq6-r seems to have about +/- 6arc second periodic errors, repeating over about 8 minutes.  This will give you long or egg shaped stars once you start to go past 30 second exposures and you will need spot-on polar alignment.    I guide my 1000mm focal length scope with a small guide camera inserted in the 9x50 guidescope (with suitable adapter) and it works a treat.  

 

If you are a true beginner, I'd probably suggest a smaller, less demanding scope (eg 150PDS) and save a few euros to see if you need to buy some guiding equipement. (guide camera, laptop, EQdirect cable, guidescope/finderscope adapter etc).

Thank you mikey2000 for the fast reply. 

i think collimation of the Telescope would not be that big deal to me, i'm good with handworking and it seems not too complicated (not underestimating):) . 

i already did some researches about guide cameras and i found this  ALccd-QHY Kamera 5R-IIc Color in acceptable price and promising Performance, would it be compatible with EQ6-R Synscan? or would i meet any troubles with it? considering that i'm more interested in Galaxies and Nebulas.  

with best regards, 

Edited by OJ87
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd suggest starting a new thread about choosing a guide cam - the range of choice is vast and a lot depends on the guidescope/main scope focal ratios.  It's a bit beyond me!  My instinct with teh QHY5R-IIc is that it's a bit too low resolution to decently guide a 1000mm scope through a 180mm finderscope.    I guess it would be OK through a longer focal lengtg "proper" guidescope though.

 

Choices, choices!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miky2000 thank you for the help.

Now my next question is about power supply (i already read the power tanks) , I know the power demand is very variable depending on the mounts load and what else is draining your power supply. Which power supply would be save to make it save the whole night (max 8 hours) without any issues? Assuming I'll need to charge my laptop once or twice as well? 

I read about car batteries, are they save? What else do I need to connect it with the mount? Anyone can help me? 

Best regards, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 04/02/2019 at 14:57, Stub Mandrel said:

If its any help I guide a 1200mm scope with a 280mm guidescope and a ZWO ASI120MC

Oh I wish you hadn't said that.   Now I'm off looking for another guide scope!  (mine is 150mm and my telescope is Zhumell Z8 1200mm).

Hey everyone, this is my first post here guys.

2019_02_03_IMG_5936_sm.jpg.ed3fea900588f6e5deb5a09f461a2264.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I’m now a proud new owner of a eq6-r! 

 

Decided to to give it a test to see how the polar scope is, and it’s abit out! Clouds rocked in and today a job of calibrating the scope with a distant tv Ariel is in order -_- 

 

its a beautiful mount, and my esprit 80 just looks beautiful sat on it ^_^ can’t wait for clear skies! And test it with the zwo1600 ? 

 

Gareth 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here’s a test shot ( just stars! Nothing to special like a galaxy or nebula)  with the zwo 1600mm pro mono, I had a brief window of about a hour and half last night, I polar aligned, and then took a couple of pictures, first one I forgot to put the guiding on in eqmod. Star trails galore... 

i then enabled guiding within eqmod.

 

this was just pointing straight up , with a 20 sec exposure with my esprit 80, on the eq6-r, no darks or lights just a single shot with just the camera, first light, and no phd guiding as I forgot to get the right attachment! Dosey I am at times ha! 

I have now downloaded all the stuff needed to platesolve so hopefully on the next time I get out I will have something of interest to show ... 

 

92A5CFEE-BDA6-4D46-BEDB-887EB6DDB37E.jpeg

Edited by Gareth88
Missed a word :/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had my mount about 18 months now and absolutely love it compared to my old mount, I only have one issue and I don't know if others have the same problem, the clutches on both axes never seem to fully lock the mount, I only have to put a bit of pressure on the mount and they move. Is there any way of adjusting them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/02/2019 at 21:29, Dinglem said:

I've had my mount about 18 months now and absolutely love it compared to my old mount, I only have one issue and I don't know if others have the same problem, the clutches on both axes never seem to fully lock the mount, I only have to put a bit of pressure on the mount and they move. Is there any way of adjusting them?

The same thing in my mount, i think it’s made with purpose to protect the fine  gears inside from damage caused by accidental pressure. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.