Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep9_banner.thumb.jpg.05c1bdd298547fd225896a3d99c9bc17.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I have a chance to buy Lidl style Bresser refractor on this particular EQ mount.

post-15189-0-01380400-1384549662_thumb.j

Does anybody here know exactly what mount it is? Do any of you any experience attaching a simple EQ2 motor drive to it? See below.

post-15189-0-43969400-1384549722.jpg

It seems very sturdy compared to EQ2 so I'm tempted. I know there are probably not the same mounting holes on the Bresser EQ as there are on EQ2, but my hope is that the R/A gear and worm might be of similar size (and ratio) to EQ2, so that the speed of EQ2 motor drive rotation could accomodate it. If so, a little bit of DIYing might be enough. Any thoughts?

Thank you very much.

Edited by assasincz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't offer any advice on this specific mount, but I recently brought one of the Bresser Exos2 mounts, which is effectively a re-badged Meade LXD-75 mount.    This mount was very nicely made and finished and much better than the comparative CG-5 and EQ-5 models I have seen, though the tripod legs were slightly smaller diameter.

I would expect that this is also a Meade mount rebadged for Bresser.   Your one appears to be an EQ2 clone, perhaps the EQ80-A

This one appears to have the same motor mount - http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/attachments/6140059-EQ80-A_Upgrade.pdf

Edited by SnakeyJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fitted a drive to the same unit....I forget the detail but I'm sure Jarrod (JB80) can supply details. Drop him a PM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skylux 70-700 Lidl supermarket telescope - also known as Skylux 379. The mount is identical to the "Astro-3" mounting.  The mount is similar to the "EQ2" but some parts are on the opposite side.

I bought one of the above several years ago, and it is similar to the "Bresser" model currently being offered from time to time in Lidl stores.

Just to recap, these scopes are a great bargain, as the performance is universally judged to be not bad, and you could spend a lot more money and not necessarily get a better performing scope. The mount is (or was) available separately for more than Lidl charged for the whole kit.

The mount, with its V-block clamp, is not bad, and  the standard V-block will accept all sorts of scopes and cameras so long as you use a V-block adapter (and so long as they're not too big and heavy)

The weak point of the scope itself is the eyepieces - these are Kellners (a more or less obsolete design) and not great. General opinion is that it's worth replacing them with better quality eyepieces like Plossls. Eyepieces are the bog-standard 1 1/4" size, so any 1 1/4" eyepiece will work.  I tried a 20mm Plossl and it was a definite improvement.  (I also tried a 10X/22mm widefield microscope eyepiece of 30mm fit, and it went in the focusser and worked great.) 

Unfortunately, a set of good eyepieces could cost more than you paid for the kit in the first place, unless bought at a discount.

Electric drive? I searched all over for any information on a suitable electric drive for my scope, and found frustratingly little, considering that lorryloads of these scopes have been sold all over Europe.

Here's what I have been able to find out. The mount is identical to the "Astro 3", but the only commonly available drives are for the "EQ2" mount which is slighly different (some bits on opposite side. )  I took a chance and ordered a "Sky-Watcher RA Single-Axis Motor Drive" (economy version) for £29.99.  This is an all-in-one box (recognisable in photos) that takes a 9v PP3 battery (not supplied). To mount it, I took off the RA slow-motion flex drive and attached the drive box to the shaft via its semi-flex coupling. 

I had to make up a slotted angle bracket to secure the drive's mounting bracket to the Astro 3 mount, using one of the worm drive housing screws, and a 4mm nut, bolt and washer.  (I think another poster used duct tape).

To fit the battery, unscrew the two black knobs on the face of the  box (the instructions don't tell you this).  Other poster says the battery should last 13 hours.  The motor is quite noisy.  

Yes it does work - but I had to switch the direction to "S".  The speed adjustment (analog) is quite wide, so don't worry about your worm drive not having the right number of teeth. You can't use the hand slow motion with the motor engaged.

The more expensive Sky-watcher EQ2 drive? (with separate battery box and handset) So far as I can figure, it mounts in an entirely different way, using the pivot stud, cam and gear on the side of the (EQ2) mounting.  So depending on the detail of your mounting, you might, or might not, be able to attach it without doing some mechanical engineering. 

Final note - the Lidl mount is filled with very thick Chinese grease (intended to disguise the play in a mass-produced budget mount). If you strip down the mounting (taking care to note where all the spacers go - instructions on Web) and clean the worms and gearwheels with white spirit, and regrease with regular car grease, it'll work a lot better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Julessilver
      Hi SGL forum.
      I currently have a HEQ5 Pro mount which I am just about to attach an Astroberry to for normal astro pics etc. 
      However I am really interested in sticking a normal camera and wideish lens to do some wide field panoramic milky way shots and stitch them together. 
      So mt question is have any of you ever seen anything that will drive the mount to do a patchwork of shots automatically?
       

    • By Armaan Sandhu
      I have been trying to see Jupiter for a while now, but all I am seeing is a whitish blob with a tinge of yellow and blue at the ends. 
      I have tried several filters, but to no avail. 
      I am using an Astromaster 130eq, Celestron with magnifications ranging from 20mm to a 6mm plus a 2X Barlow lens. 
      many suggestions would be greatly appreciated. 
      regards, Armaan. 
       

    • By Rogr18
      Hi, 
      Sorry if this has already been asked ( I think it would have been, there are posts similar but can't see the the answer I'm looking for) 
      I have a celestron C8-N scope that came with a Cg5 mount,  it's at least 10 years old and although it had a lot of use to start with it's been gathering dust the last few years. 
      So I would like to fit a motorised goto mount to it and was considering a synscan  pro3 for an Eq5 mount. 
      Can someone tell me are these 2 mounts the same and if so will the synscan be OK for my Cg5 mount. 
      If not are there any others I should look at? 
      Thanks
    • By matthasboldlygone
      Hi all,
      Got bored during lockdown and purchased a telescope. It's a Bresser Refractor Telescope AR-102/600 EQ-3 with mount and tripod from Amazon for about £280. I've been enjoying it and added a Bresser Full HD Deep-Sky Camera to it so I could share some images. Not really sure what I wanted to look at and feel I may have bought the wrong things, but hey I'm having fun.
      I've been looking to get the mount motorised (RA) and spent much time looking at all the options.
      As a beginner I'm now thinking why not just jump in and get a computerised mount with all the features built in by experts.
      I found the Explore Scientific EXOS-2 PMC-Eight GOTO Mount on BresserUK for about £600, twice what I paid for my entire setup so far. But thinking the mount is very important, no matter how good the scope is a bad mount is going to make things hard. Working from the ground up so to speak.
      I'd like to get into stacking some images of the planets, moon, maybe some general stary shots and even something nebula like.
      Would you say this is a good purchase considering the scope and camera I have? A good starting point for building a better setup over time?
      And if I changed my mind later on, it would have a good resale value?
      Cheers 👍



    • By Victor Boesen
      Perhaps the title is lying a tiny bit... After sleeping for one hour I woke up not able to fall asleep again after numerous attempts. I took the obligatory gaze outside at the bright summer sky with some faint noctilucent clouds towards the north. Jupiter and Saturn looked beautiful in the south and that was when I felt a sudden itch to get out my small grab and go setup. I quickly grabbed my tripod, mount-head and telescope to head downstairs to the parking lot where I quickly set up the scope. Cool-down was almost not a problem because of the hot 20 degree air which was very comfortable observing temperatures.
      Starting with Jupiter, after I had achieved focus on Altair, the two main cloud bands very obvious together with three of its moons hovering like pin-points around the perfect round sphere. I've previously been a little disappointed with the view of Jupiter with this small Skywatcher Evostar 72ED DS-Pro but I blamed it on my own patience and this morning I proved myself right. After studying the planet for a couple of minutes I noticed the Ganymede shadow transit located just above (almost on the edge of) the northern equatorial belt and letting the planet drift through the FOV at 90X magnification with the 4.7mm explore scientific eyepiece the shadow together with the bands popped at me at times of great seeing. The moments where you're almost "falling into" a better and better planetary image is truly amazing and the small 72mm scope did a very good job also resolving the shadow transit as a "globe" rather than a dot. Only rarely could I tell the slight variations in the two main cloud bands of Jupiter but this was very difficult with only 72mm.
      Saturn proved to be equally fascinating just like every other time I point the telescope towards the ringed planet. Immediately slight banding was visible on the planet and the rings were very defined with the Cassini-division visible in moments of good seeing but really standing out in brief moments of very good seeing. The small evostar 72 has no problem on Saturn whereas more patience is required with Jupiter because of its low contrast features. Saturn never disappoints.
      Moving on to Mars I noticed how it had increased slightly in size since I observed it last time about a month ago. The southern polar cap was still very obvious but for some reason I recalled it being even more noticeable last time I observed Mars but I could be wrong. Right above the polar cap was a dark spot which extended to the planet's equator but not covering the entirety of the disk's width. I didn't notice any features on the northern half of the disk. The evostar does a surprisingly good job on Mars, which often causes problems for other doublet refractors with trouble correcting the red part of the visible spectrum. The evostar doesn't have much unfocused red light around the planet and the view isn't "mushy" like it would be in cases of a badly corrected refractor.

      I love my grab and go setup but I also feel like I need a higher magnification eyepiece since my current weapon of choice is my 4.7mm explore scientific 82 degree eyepiece which delivers about 90X magnification. I've almost always felt I could easily push magnifications to the plus side of 100X and the Nagler zoom 3-6mm is ranked very high on my wish list:) August this year marks the first year of owning the Skywatcher Evostar 72ED DS-Pro and I haven't had a moment where I didn't love it. The size of it is perfect and the supplied flight case for the scope is airline portable together with some room for accessories. The optics are very good even for decent planetary observing like it was the case this morning, and I feel like I haven't utilized the scope's abilities entirely just because I think it could take even higher magnifications. I have also used it for astrophotography on my star adventurer which yields very good results with the OVL field flattener and my old Nikon D3300.
      This post ended up being quite long but I hope it was worth the read anyways. If you're considering the Evostar-72 I once again highly recommend it if you couldn't already tell from this post;)
      Clear skies, Victor
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.