Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_2019_sp_banner.thumb.jpg.a0ff260c05b90dead5c594e9b4ee9fd0.jpg

Merlin66

Members
  • Content Count

    11,667
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Merlin66

  1. Can the OAG be fitted in front of the flattener?
  2. Probably 50% at 4000 A and going down to zero at 3500 A. would probably give you some results..... (I’d need to check the ASI 174 for comparison)
  3. Chris, Don’t know about the ASI 120, but I can record well down in the UV with the ASI 174mm when using the spectroheliograph. The CaK lines make an easy target......
  4. I was using a FULL spectrum modded 1000D. I’ll find the image.....
  5. Chris, Notwithstanding I found the prism easily pick Ha emission, I have some images, I’ll upload later.
  6. Rodd, interesting..... I use the ASI 174 and the ASI 1600 for solar imaging. Obviously the solar disk is magnitudes (!) brighter than your stars.... Your results would indicate that the contrast with the ASI 1600 should be compromised due the micro lenses. If, so I've never seen or been aware of it.
  7. Chris, Not exactly the same, but I have manged to record down to 3700A with a ATiK314L+ with the slit spectroscope. Without a UV cut it really depends on the optics and camera response. I'm interested to hear about your objective prism....I have a 20 deg f2 prism which can be mounted in front of my ED80.... early results with a FULL modded DSLR were very promising ( especially in the NIR) Ken
  8. Changing over to groups.IO now attract a ransom fee of $110/ year, they say this is the cost of procrastination.....change over prior to April 2019 would have been free......
  9. Yeah, a real bumma!! Google.groups doesn't look to well itself.... no recent updates and doesn't seem to accept transfer of data from an existing Yahoo group.
  10. Lots of features of Yahoo groups will cease on the 21st October 2019 including deleting attachments, message digests etc, etc. See https://in.help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN3101...pressions=true What are the options available to support a similar group?? I'm already aware of groups.IO (but at an annual cost to the owner of $110)
  11. Possibly not the best solution..... but I’ve use a C11 at f10 for spectroscopy mounted on a NEQ6PRO for the past ten years, no issues no drama.
  12. Nigella, I'd recommend Andrew's Tutorial ( see p 36) https://britastro.org/sites/default/files/BAA_BASS_Tutorial_0.pdf I usually crop the profile from say 3800 to 7000A, to make things easier. (The Astronomical spectroscopy website has recently been updated - worth checking out.... http://www.astronomicalspectroscopy.com/ )
  13. All the manufactures of the four element Petzval designed scopes (WO, Tak and TV) have put it in writing that their scopes are 100% safe to use with a Herschel wedge.
  14. Ok, but could the top plate be removed and redrilled/ modified to give more Az adjustment......
  15. I ‘ve been using TeamViewer for the past ten years between the laptop in the observatory and the office PC. what else can I say....works well for me, no issues, no drama.
  16. RonL, He states but doesn’t explain. As mentioned above the FOV brightness will diminish due to the higher magnifcation being achieved - for the same eyepiece used without the barlow. You would see the same effect using an eyepiece with half the focal length without the Barlow.
  17. Matt, What's the small orange piece and spring at the bottom - just odd bits? When you look through the "gap" at the base of the mount - anything visible??? Ken
  18. Matt, I think I understand the issue..... The text in the images obscures the bottom connection to the pier plates... Is there any option of re-setting/ adjusting the mount at this interface?? (or at the base of the pier??) Ken
  19. Louise, Although not the best solution the beamsplitter guider worked reasonably well. We developed a "virtual" slit which could be registered to the actual as a means of acquiring and guiding on the target star. A Vixen flip mirror body was used: http://www.astronomicalspectroscopy.com/files/Vixen mod.pdf Al's reticule was used... AlsReticule33.zip
  20. Louise, Think of the reflective slit plate as an off axis guider... but where the pick off mirror is large and on the optical axis so it picks up a guider FOV as big as the mirror/ guider chip. In the middle of this "pick off mirror" we have a very fine gap (the slit) say around 20 micron wide. We need to focus the target star into this slit gap and still be able to guide for as long as required. The starlight then goes through the slit and into the spectrograph....the light is collimated (made parallel) and reaches the grating which disperses the light into the spectrum. This spectrum is then refocused (after the grating) by the imaging lens (or the collimator in the case of a Littrow) to present a spectral image to your imaging camera. Hope this helps.
  21. Louise, The description and usage is very similar to the Classical spectrograph (but a folded optical layout) The links on this page may help:http://www.astronomicalspectroscopy.com/classical.html For setting up and usage: http://www.astronomicalspectroscopy.com/How_to.html
  22. Louise, On our files area : https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/astronomical_spectroscopy/files/Paul Gerlach/
  23. Looks like you focused on the zero order star image....not the spectrum. http://www.astronomicalspectroscopy.com/gratings.html
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.