Jump to content

Newbie from Darlington


justbuggin

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I've been interested in astronomy since I was a kid, but finally been spurred into buying my first telescope now that I've got my hands on a decent DSLR. I've always fancied photographing deep space objects, but I realise that will depend on a mix of equipment and experience. I have a lot of experience in photography, on a professional basis, so I'm looking forward to learning a new apsect of that.

I live in a village a few miles outside of Darlington, so light pollution isn't as bad as it could be. Luckily I work on the Isle of Wight, so I get to spend every other week on the island, with it's lovely dark skies.

I'm about to embark on the hunt for a reasonable "starter" scope, so would welcome any advice offered. While I'm tempted to dive in and get a Skyliner 150P, I really want something with tracking and possibly a larger aperture if I can afford it, so I can take photographs. Budget would be up to £500, less if possible.

I look forward to reading previous posts and picking your collective brains!

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Welcome to the SGL.

It may sound counter intuitive but aperture is not the crucial factor when it comes to capturing deep sky objects like Nebula and galaxies, the tracking accuracy and stability of the mount is. Might I suggest that if astrophotography is your goal, you purchase the book "Making Every Photon Count." It is a fantastic introductory guide to the "dark art" of astrophotography and will help you to better understand all the challenges involved and allow you to better select equipment that is fit for the desired purpose.

http://www.firstlightoptics.com/books/making-every-photon-count-steve-richards.html

The demands of visual astronomy are somewhat different where tracking is nice luxury but not necessity (hence the popularity of the Dobsonian mount) and larger apertures will reveal more of the universe to you.

Clear skies,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Rob and welcome to SGL!! Another vote for Steve's book. With Astrophotography the mount is the all important bit of kit. If you have some good camera lenses you could use them rather than buy a telescope. Something around 200-400mm will take good images of deep sky objects. Aparture is not so important as you can simply keep the shutter open longer if you want to capture the faint stuff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi There,

Warm welcome to SGL...And another vote for 'making every photon count'...If you are intent on doing some imaging, then do invest in the book as it will save your hard earned cash in the long run :smiley: ..You mention getting a larger apperture scope for imaging, this does not always the way with maging, larger scope = beefier mount = more cash !. If you have a look at some of the images posted here, there are some excellent images produced with smaller apo refractors. However you are going to need a substantial mount and guiding gear.

Good luck with your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

Welcome to SGL. I would suggest going for a scope on an equatorial mount with motor drive or GOTO. Depending on scope size you will need an EQ3 or EQ5 to fit your budget.

A Skywatcher 150p on GOTO mount is right at the top of your budget

http://www.firstlightoptics.com/reflectors/skywatcher-explorer-150pl-eq-3-pro-goto.html

Or you could look around for an ex-demo or second hand scope, that would save some money.

Robin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.