michael8554
Members-
Posts
5,063 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by michael8554
-
Not my strong suit Michael
-
So you stop guiding and revolve the dome when nature calls ? Michael
-
Those 18mm ones are the same width as my single ones ! Looks as though a previous owner has not fitted the right replacements ! Does your door foul on the lower shutter rail brackets when the shutter is opposite the door ? Michael
-
Hi Jeremy Interested by your images of the new wheels. Did yours have double wheels originally ? If not, why did you go for double ? One of the wheels on my Mk 1 falls off the track at a certain point, double or much wider wheels would stop that on mine. Michael
-
http://dslrmodifications.com/rebelmod450d1.html Michael
-
Pacman with annoying artefacts
michael8554 replied to Erling G-P's topic in Getting Started With Imaging
Given the very oblique nature of the reflections, a Dew Shield might help. Michael -
Polar Alignment Questions...
michael8554 replied to Shaun_Astro's topic in Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
Hi Gasconman If you're only doing Visual, looking through eyepieces, then roughly pointing north will be good enough. PA only becomes important if you want an object to stay exactly in the middle of the Field of View for a long time, as in Long Exposure Astrophotography. You can get very good PA by Drift Aligning with only a high mag eyepiece, ideally one with a reticle to aid centring. Michael -
Einstein and The Yerkes 40 Inch Refractor
michael8554 replied to michael8554's topic in History of Astronomy
Good point actually, the setting circles are as impressive as the rest of the scope. Michael -
ASCOM Driver for Meade AutoStar/AudioStar based telescopes
michael8554 replied to cjdawson's topic in Discussions - Software
I believe it's the other way round - Device Hub has replaced POTH Michael -
Hilarious...... Michael
-
Your link was to a Multispeed Handset, so I assumed low speeds were available. 8X might work, but I'd suggest starting with the lowest setting and find one that gives 12 to 15 steps in the calibration. Michael
-
The concept for modifying the handset is that you attach a wire carrying the guide commands to a left and to a right slew button contact. So you only need to identify the correct contact with a test meter, the rest of the mod should be as in the Dual Axis mod. Michael
-
The legend says "Up is -85.5 degrees E of N". I think this means that RA is running from top to bottom of the image. If so the drift is in RA. That means it's not due to poor PA, that movement would be in Dec. Simplest explanation would be slop in the image train, since you say it varies the sky position. The Belt Mod removes Periodic Error caused by the gearbox, but the Periodic Error due to the worm and wormwheel remains. However I seem to remember the worm period is typically 480 seconds on these mounts ? So 10 to 15 minutes would be 2 or 3 cycles, are you sure it's not showing the full drift after 8 minutes ? If you don't want to use the mount PEC you will need to guide if you want longer exposures. But all this assumes I'm right about the image orientation 🙂 Michael
-
Tools for maintenance
michael8554 replied to pob175's topic in Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
Does your mount have metric or Imperial Allen screws ? Michael -
Ra tracking fine but Dec drops off
michael8554 replied to AstroNebulee's topic in Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
Hi Lee If you have Polar Aligned and it's "bang on", then your Lat setting must be correct. But to get to the bottom of these issues you need to quantify your PA figure, "bang on" is meaningless. You say that Jupiter "drops out of the eyepiece" - is that in RA or Dec ? A RA drift could be the Periodic Error in your mount. A Dec drift could be the mount shifting due to loose mesh between the worm and wormwheel, offset balance slightly to take up that slack. Michael -
Ah John you really ought to get a non-motorised dome like mine. Think of the exercise you get from rotating the dome every 15 minutes or so, and scraping your back on the doorframe in the process. Oh and trapping yourself inside the dome if the shutter is opposite the door, as in that position the lower shutter rail brackets prevent the door opening! I could raise the brackets of course, but then the shutter wouldn't open past the zenith. And the muscles you develop trying to pull the shutter closed if it's past the zenith. Maybe not with your back. Mine's the very first Pulsar 2.1M version Try as I might I could not get the wall or the dome to be circular when the segments were tightened together, before bolting to the concrete. So one of the wheels falls off the track at a certain point. Doesn't help that the wheels are on the outside, so nothing to stop that - moving one wheel inwards pushes the opposite one out, so that one falls off the track instead. I believe the newer ones have the wheels inside ? Not Pulsar's finest hour, but I wouldn't be without it. Michael
-
Problems with DSS and darks
michael8554 replied to SmokeyJoe's topic in Imaging - Image Processing, Help and Techniques
Try DSS without the Master Dark and Master Bias Instead use the Master Bias as the Dark. (A common DSLR image technique, but needs Dithers to work well ) But it could be that your 1 minute exposures have hardly any more data than your Darks. Michael -
Here's a random shot of an AZ-EQ mount and Reflector telescope. The eyepiece and finder are both in easy to reach positions:
-
Capabilities of Sky-Watcher evo guide
michael8554 replied to Craig a's topic in Imaging - Discussion
Here's a calculator: https://astronomy.tools/calculators/ccd You enter the pixel size and focal length and it calculates the image scale, 1.07arcsecs/pixel and 4.43arcsecs/pixel That a ratio of 4.1 : 1 By coincidence the Canon 1100D and the Orion Autoguider both have the same size pixels, 5.2 um So in this case only it's easy, the ratio of image scales is simply the ratio of the focal lengths, 242mm to 1000mm, or 4.1 : 1 I'd expect that to work for you. Michael -
T Ring for My Canon
michael8554 replied to oasacorp's topic in Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
If advertised for Canon EOS it will fit. They have accidently sent one for a Pentax K I expect. Just get a swap from them. Michael -
You may not have realised that many of the M101 images you've seen all started out looking like your image. Then the Image Processing magic happened. Agreed on guiding as a good next step. An OAG will be less expensive than a guidescope, rings, mounting plates etc, and will be suitable for almost every future setup you get. Michael
-
My last NEOWISE shot
michael8554 replied to michael.h.f.wilkinson's topic in Imaging - Widefield, Special Events and Comets
NEOWISE was really good while it lasted, the comet we've waited years for. Michael -
Problems with DSS and darks
michael8554 replied to SmokeyJoe's topic in Imaging - Image Processing, Help and Techniques
Hey Joe, (Where You Goin' With That Telescope In Your Hand ..........?) :-} What length are your exposures ? Are you using the Recommended settings in DSS ? Michael