Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M101 reprocess


MartinB

Recommended Posts

This is a reworking of data collected at Les Granges using Olly's TEC 140 and my QSI 532. The suppose the moral is not to post in haste. I have tried to make the galaxy a bit more vibrant and pull out the outer arms a bit more. It's tricky because if you over do it the whole thing looks unpleasant and you loose contrast. You also need a well calibrated monitor which I hope mine is.

I would be grateful for any feed back. There are a lot of subjective choices to be made when processing and a bit of guidance is always helpful. I've tweaked the stars a little. Other than a couple of big bloated ones all that has been done is a 1 pixel minimum filter faded to 40% and a 0.8 pixel unsharp mask using a 2 pixel threshold ie hardly any sharpening. Then a small (+12) saturation boost.

I've posted the lower one beneath for comparison

post-12794-133877450476_thumb.jpg

post-12794-133877450482_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difficult to call IMO, the top certainly has more of the faint arms showing and has more vibrance and you have got rid of the slight green cast towards the centre of the galaxy.... but the stars look tighter in the lower one and the detail seems more natural

having said that i would be please with either.....top one has the edge for definate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are both great results Martin, as is the top image gets my vote.:)

Top one has much nicer depth in both the outer galaxy detail and star field but (on my screen) is a little magenta.

I like the dust detail in the core on the bottom edit.

I would tweak the overall colour balance in the top image fix the core's green colour cast on the bottom and then add that core detail to the top image as a masked layer set to somethig like 50-70% opacity.

Had a quick play as above, hope you dont mind.

Mike.

post-13376-133877450501_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot everyone for the helpful comments.

I agree Mike, in getting rid of the green cast I dropped the overall green a little and then selectively dropped the localised green cast. This gave the slight magenta cast to the outer areas which you've corrected nicely.

So a few tweaks to make and then leave it well alone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The background and starfield looks better in the reprocess Martin, and the whole image has more vibrancy, but the galaxy itself looks a bit too pushed to me. There is some lovely natural looking detail and delicate colour in your first process which has been lost a bit in the reprocess.

Both very good though :)

Cheers

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be over the moon with either Martin.

But I prefer the lower of the two... Whilst there is more galaxy in the top one, there is also a lightness around the brighter stars.

Having said that on my work laptop screen, I cannot see a green or magenta tinge on either... :)

Ant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is obviously an art to really appreciating these images. I'm afraid my expertise parallels my ability in wine-tasting. I drink it and think, mmmh I like that. So M101, mmmh thanks I like that! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the more vibrant galaxy in the reprocess. Interestingly I went through a similar process with my own version from the same scope. However, what I failed to do in going after the faint outer arms was keep your good contrast within the main part of the spiral. I ended up with a rather solid-looking disc.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.