Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Elephant's Trunk and accidental Squid


gorann

Recommended Posts

This one was not planned. I thought my recently posted image of the Elephant's Trunk was the last one for the season, as I had almost forgotten that I was testing out sensor distances on my Samyang 135 with ASI2600MC piggybacking on my dual RASA8 rig, while aiming the RASAs at the Elephant's trunk (see the previously posted image). I had not realized that the squid was so nearby. If I had known I may have made an effort of framing this image better, but at least I did not accidentally decapitate the squid. To the 17 x 10 min of Samyang data I have added ca 50% RASA8 data to the Elephant's Trunk and 30% to the Squid. All with IDAS NBZ filters and ASI2600MC cameras. Totally probably around 10 hours of data.

Comments most welcome!

Cheers, Göran

20220425 Elephant Trunk SY135 PS21smallSign.jpg

  • Like 29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice!
 

When attempting a bat/squid capture with the RASA I had the SY135/G28300 running on the dual rig and did it the other way round and chopped off half of the Elephant’s trunk region. ☺️
 

E9C959A5-6A83-441C-B442-E864637F5076.thumb.jpeg.16b114269b82ad181e393f3fe99cd023.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tomato said:

Nice!
 

When attempting a bat/squid capture with the RASA I had the SY135/G28300 running on the dual rig and did it the other way round and chopped off half of the Elephant’s trunk region. ☺️
 

 

Thanks!

He, he🤣. Maybe that is a good reason to have a piggy back: getting that extra surprise the next morning. A new form of lucky / unlucky imaging!

Edited by gorann
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m amazed the Squid is so clear with just 10 hours of subs; @geeklee and I combined 1600 minutes (over 26 hours) of OIII data last year and it was a real struggle to tease it out of the Bat ( https://www.astrobin.com/ceh9fs/ ). Your combination of Samyang 135, ASI2600MC and IDAS NBZ filter are doing an amazing job when combined with your dark skies.

Thanks for sharing.

Adrian. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Adreneline said:

I’m amazed the Squid is so clear with just 10 hours of subs; @geeklee and I combined 1600 minutes (over 26 hours) of OIII data last year and it was a real struggle to tease it out of the Bat ( https://www.astrobin.com/ceh9fs/ ). Your combination of Samyang 135, ASI2600MC and IDAS NBZ filter are doing an amazing job when combined with your dark skies.

Thanks for sharing.

Adrian. 

Thanks Adrian!

This is what the Squid looks like after 6 hours with just the RASA8. I am sure the dark sky here helps a lot for such a faint thing. I really like the complex sky in your AB image.

b58e334e-4cb8-4265-bfd9-c61b75650ca3.jpg

Edited by gorann
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, carastro said:

You git a decent Squid there.  You must have dark skies.  
 

Carole

Thanks a lot Carole!

Yes quite dark with an average SQM of 21.5 so Bortle 2-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, gorann said:

I really like the complex sky in your AB image.

Thank you Göran. I think Cepheus is such a rich area to image and so well placed most of the year from this location.

My skies are not quite as dark as where you are - I'm more Bortle 4-3 - especially after midlnight when all the street lights round here go off!

There are many amazing images from the ASI2600MC revealing a lot of colour and detail. Might have to start saving my pennies!

Adrian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Adreneline said:

Thank you Göran. I think Cepheus is such a rich area to image and so well placed most of the year from this location.

My skies are not quite as dark as where you are - I'm more Bortle 4-3 - especially after midlnight when all the street lights round here go off!

There are many amazing images from the ASI2600MC revealing a lot of colour and detail. Might have to start saving my pennies!

Adrian

It is an amazingly good camera. Only problem is that one batch suffered from oil behind the sensor leaking onto the front. I had tha happening to two of mine but It was quickly and apparently permanently fixed ny TS.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, AMcD said:

I love the fact that your test image is of an exquisite quality that I can only aspire to 😂

Thanks! You will get there!

CS

Göran 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, clarkpm4242 said:

Gorgeous and fascinating!

I've noted the area for my recently acquired Sigma 105 f1.4 lens.

Thank you Goran.

Paul

Thanks a lot Paul and good luck with your new lens!

CS Göran 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why it happened, but the dark ring around IC1396 is not, I don't think, supposed to be there (based on other imnages I have seen). Could it be a DBE or ABE issue?  Details in teh nebula look good.  I am surprised that I find myself feeling more data would help ( 11" at f2 x 2 is fast and 11 hours should plenty).    I like the RGB palette--never cared for the yellows of the hubble palette for certain nebula (the bat is one).  I am actually feeing that way about most nebulas these days--so much so that I prefer bicolor images over SHO palettes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Rodd said:

Not sure why it happened, but the dark ring around IC1396 is not, I don't think, supposed to be there (based on other imnages I have seen). Could it be a DBE or ABE issue?  Details in teh nebula look good.  I am surprised that I find myself feeling more data would help ( 11" at f2 x 2 is fast and 11 hours should plenty).    I like the RGB palette--never cared for the yellows of the hubble palette for certain nebula (the bat is one).  I am actually feeing that way about most nebulas these days--so much so that I prefer bicolor images over SHO palettes.

I was also thinking about this. I did not use DBE but Gradient Xterminator in PS. I decided to leave it as it is since it could be for real especially since I see a lot of structure (dark nebulosity) in the dark area around IC1396. I also found some images suggesting a darker area around the nebula, like this one: https://www.astrobin.com/g59ygw/ and it may be that my strong suppression of the star field (using Star Exterminator) brought out more of the underlying nebulosity and thereby the dark stuff. Also Aladin (DSS2) suggest that there may be a dark area around the nebula (attached image).

Maybe someone knows more and have a comment?

Screenshot 2022-05-04 at 10.56.11.png

Edited by gorann
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, gorann said:

I was also thinking about this. I did not use DBE but Gradient Xterminator in PS. I decided to leave it as it is since it could be for real especially since I see a lot of structure (dark nebulosity) in the dark area around IC1396. I also found some images suggesting a darker area around the nebula, like this one: https://www.astrobin.com/g59ygw/ and it may be that my strong suppression of the star field (using Star Exterminator) brought out more of the underlying nebulosity and thereby the dark stuff. Also Aladin (DSS2) suggest that there may be a dark area around the nebula (attached image).

Maybe someone knows more and have a comment?

I can't comment on the reality of the dark ring around IC1396 but I can offer another datapoint; my image of this region using the Samyang 135mm and QHY268M (same sensor). There does appear to be a lot of dark dust in this region but I'm not sure the 'dark ring' is that pronounced.

Cheers

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Spongey said:

I can't comment on the reality of the dark ring around IC1396 but I can offer another datapoint; my image of this region using the Samyang 135mm and QHY268M (same sensor). There does appear to be a lot of dark dust in this region but I'm not sure the 'dark ring' is that pronounced.

Cheers

 

 

It could relate to how much Ha is let through in the background sky, and I turned it up quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, gorann said:

It could relate to how much Ha is let through in the background sky, and I turned it up quite a bit.

If it is of any use, here is the processed Ha only from the above image:

image.thumb.jpeg.30300f08d4f7503eb5786baba9101b0c.jpeg

If you'd like the raw stack to compare with yours, PM me and I can figure out a way to send it to you.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Spongey said:

If it is of any use, here is the processed Ha only from the above image:

image.thumb.jpeg.30300f08d4f7503eb5786baba9101b0c.jpeg

If you'd like the raw stack to compare with yours, PM me and I can figure out a way to send it to you.

Cheers

Thanks, but I am not sure how to make a proper comparison as I have dual-band OSC data, so no pure Ha data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all comments! They made me completely rework it. Adjusting the colour curves made the dark ring around the main nebula less apparent:

20220425 Elephant Trunk SY135 PS24smallSign.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Astro_mark_c said:

That looks ace, I also have the IDAS NBZ filter for my Redcat 51.  These are two targets I want to attempt when the dark nights return to scotland in September. 

Thanks Mark! Go fo it! I have the same problem - proper astrodarkness is gone so tonight will most likely be my last imaging night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.