Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

M101 Pinwheel vs ASI224MC


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Though M101 is a relatively large target it is quite dim and this required a significant effort to get detail into its core. I took 31hrs of 30sec exposures which I then thinned down to the best 18hrs of data. Processed in APP and PS it was tricky keeping the core detail that I had imaged from blowing out.
Lots of advice and lots of very small curves stretches was the key in the end. Hardly sharpened it much with noise reduction undertaken as and when noise just stared to appear during stretching.
As the sensor is biased towards red, colour balancing with green and more so with blue was also necessary.  
Taken at Gain 200 with a UV IR cut ASI224MC uncooled camera, APM107/700 scope on an AZEQ6. 

It’s a good little sensor if you have the conditions (cold nights) and use Flats, Flat Darks and take Darks every night as the sensor temperature varies being uncooled. For info, I found it ran at about 6 degs above ambient once it was steadily running subs off. 

Hope you like it. 
 

 

2ABEA6DD-118A-4032-9865-40BE10A00C6B.jpeg

Edited by PadrePeace
  • Like 25
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great image @PadrePeace  Dedication getting so many subs, but even more impressed with how many you threw away - I was having a twitch or two just reading that!  

It's unusual to see a scope and mount like you've listed being used with an uncooled 224MC - you've done a brilliant job.  Fantastic detail and colour and I really like that close in FOV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantastic, I always think this is an easy target until I look at my results the morning afterward. I would honestly be interested if you could put together a decent image just from the 13 hours thrown away!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, PadrePeace said:

For info, I found it ran at about 6 degs above ambient once it was steadily running subs off. 

This is a very good image!

I wonder what the lowest temperature is that this camera will work in? I live in Canada with cold temps and just bought this camera for lunar/planetary. It would be nice to be able to play around on some bright DSO without spending many thousands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, jetstream said:

This is a very good image!

I wonder what the lowest temperature is that this camera will work in? I live in Canada with cold temps and just bought this camera for lunar/planetary. It would be nice to be able to play around on some bright DSO without spending many thousands.

The issue will be the humidity as the sensor cell is not sealed. If you are in very dry cold air I’d guess you’d be okay. Mine ran at 75% humidity at -2C with the dew point at -3c and it coped fine. Camera temp was approx +4.5C when running constantly. You may get an issue if you stop shooting for more than a couple of mins as the camera cools really quickly when not active and that may cause fogging. Go head and give it a go and 
good luck.

Edited by PadrePeace
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PadrePeace said:

The issue will be the humidity as the sensor cell is not sealed. If you are in very dry cold air I’d guess you’d be okay. Mine ran at 75% humidity at -2C with the dew point at -3c and it coped fine. Camera temp was approx +4.5C when running constantly. You may get an issue if you stop shorting for more than a couple of mins as the camera cools really quickly when not active and that may cause fogging. Go head and give it a go and 
good luck.

Thanks I will next winter. I get very cold here and with low humidity at times but I can see that temp difference in the camera itself causing issues maybe. Only one way to find out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jetstream said:

Thanks I will next winter. I get very cold here and with low humidity at times but I can see that temp difference in the camera itself causing issues maybe. Only one way to find out!

I’d think if it’s not too cold to guide it’s not too cold to use this as a primary imaging camera. Stop before your hands stick to the scope!!!😄

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PadrePeace said:

I’d think if it’s not too cold to guide it’s not too cold to use this as a primary imaging camera. Stop before your hands stick to the scope!!!😄

lol!

I do have a big problem- the AZEQ6 cables are very brittle and fragile in sub -20c. I should change the grease too but it does still work. Its the cables holding me back- I need soft silicone rubber cables and ends... and dont know where to get them here.

Ive never imaged before but am gonna give it a whirl.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fantastic image Chris lots of dedication to the capture and perseverance with the processing. I love the detail that you have captured. This is not an easy target and you made it work with a uncooled camera. Congratulations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of you to say and thanks for the help and motivation to press on to 3000 subs. That allowed me to be so clinical with the cut. Shame they weren’t all top quality or this could have been very interesting. 

Just starting on NGC4565 tonight with the same rig. With the dark window closing through May I guess this may be a lesser project from an integration perspective. Nothing to loose though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PadrePeace said:

Kind of you to say and thanks for the help and motivation to press on to 3000 subs. That allowed me to be so clinical with the cut. Shame they weren’t all top quality or this could have been very interesting. 

Just starting on NGC4565 tonight with the same rig. With the dark window closing through May I guess this may be a lesser project from an integration perspective. Nothing to loose though.

Yeah but those moon effected ones had to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 01/05/2021 at 13:31, geeklee said:

Great image @PadrePeace  Dedication getting so many subs, but even more impressed with how many you threw away - I was having a twitch or two just reading that!  

It's unusual to see a scope and mount like you've listed being used with an uncooled 224MC - you've done a brilliant job.  Fantastic detail and colour and I really like that close in FOV.

Appreciate you kind comments geeklee. It started as a trial of the art of the possible really. I do have other ‘more conventional’ mono and OSC cameras for a rig like this but wanted to push the 224 to see what it could deliver with a near perfectly matched pixel scale rig. 

Edited by PadrePeace
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 01/05/2021 at 13:36, CloudMagnet said:

Fantastic, I always think this is an easy target until I look at my results the morning afterward. I would honestly be interested if you could put together a decent image just from the 13 hours thrown away!

Sorry for the delayed response. To be honest I started this during an unfavourable moon phase having had virtually no good nights for weeks. The initial data looked ok as I’m fortunately in a Bortle 4 zone so I often push things a bit. However, it was obvious in later sessions without any moon impact  that better data was obtainable. 
That said, I stacked it all in APP to see what could be produced and then canned all of the moon impacted lower SNR stuff and those with the occasional guiding issue.
Bad subs only take your image quality one way and this target was tricky enough on a good night.

Edited by PadrePeace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Similar Content

    • By alexbb
      I'm behind lately with posting images. Now it's Pinwheel's galaxy turn.
      Shot until April this year, it took me a few trips to dark/dark-ish sites to gather all the data. It's hard to believe even now how cold it was at the end of April. At the end of the last session, when I was packing, it was -5C. Now the temperature doesn't drop below 20C anymore during the night and during afternoon we have consecutive days with 38C+.
      I used, as almost always, a combination of LRGB data shot through multiple telescopes, for a total of almost 13h. The 150mm newtonian was moody, not sure why I always had something that looked like astigmatism, but only in one corner. I hope it was the CC, and I'm eager to see if the GPU CC is better than the Baader MPCC.
      An astrobin image is available too here: https://www.astrobin.com/23m3rv/
      Clear skies and thanks for watching !

       
    • By AstroMuni
      Hi all,
      I am brand new to imaging and this is my very first set of images using the ASI224mc attached to a Celestron 130EQ scope and mounted on a HEQ5pro to give it stability and GOTO ability. This scope (OTA) has mixed reviews as it has a spherical mirror and I had little hopes for it. But considering what I have managed to get with just around 8mins of data, its looking promising. 🙂
      This image is of M81 Bode's galaxy using around 100 exposures of 5sec each. These have been stacked and post processed in SIRIL. No darks or flats have been taken. Still new to this aspect of it ....The images were captured using Ekos. Any tips on how to improve the image are welcome !

       
    • By lalou
      I tried imaging M101 here in our Bortle 5 neighborhood and it was sort of tough due to the light pollution but I think I was able to pull off a bit of data. My problem now is that I was able to increase the visibility of the galaxy through stretching but in the process the background noise also increased. I also noticed that my galaxy and stars are a bit orange/reddish compared to the other M101 shots which are kinda bluish in color. Not sure if this is being caused by my astromodded camera but I tried correcting it via Photoshop and this is the best "white balanced" image that I got.
      Looking for some help in this group maybe someone can have a go with my raw file and share some techniques on how to improve my post processing. The stacking was done via DSS and the processing via Photoshop. I also used Gradient Xterminator and also Astrotools.
      Here's my edit and I also attached the raw file so maybe you guys can try tinkering with it also. Also open for any suggestions or comments with my initial edit. Thanks! 😁
      Light Frames: 189 x 1 min shots @ ISO1600 (yes I still don't have autoguiding) Dark Frames: 198 x 1 min shots Mount: Celestron OmniXLT CG-4 Telescope: Celestron C6N Camera: Canon EOS Rebel XT Hap-Griffin Mod Autosave.tif
      Autosave.tif
    • By Cosmic Geoff
      Here is a pretty view of M82, taken on 12 Dec with 102mm f5 achromat, ASI224MC camera, SLT mount.
      Live stacked, 16 frames, total 138 secs.

    • By Cosmic Geoff
      Here is a live-stacked EEVA image (14 frames, total 174secs) taken with 102mm f5 Startravel achro & ASI224MC camera on SLT mount.
      The 9th magnitude comet is the smudge toward upper right of the frame.  It's small and dim.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.