Jaffa007 Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Hi All,My new scope came last week Wednesday [skywatcher Explorer 200 HEQ5], in three box's. Just got them in the boot of the car! Had a play and set it up on Wednesday evening, but had to wait till Friday night to actually get to view through it. Even then it was quit late so was litterally working blind But didn't take long before I was searching the sky for my first object, Saturn. WOW! What a sight! Only have supplied eyepieces a 10mm & 25mm & x2 Barlow. In my humble opinion, they are excellent.My only gripe would be that the view of Saturn wasn't big enough! I WANT BIGGER.......NOWWWWW I used the 10 & 25mm with the barlow, but would like to see more, would a 6mm eyepiece be my next purchase? Or am I going the wrong way? Advice please, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 It's an F/5 scope so image scale will be quite small but if you use ya 10mm ep and 2xbarlow it will be huge :shock: i had the same setup and it worked fine like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinB Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Great kit Jaffa It might have been said before but size doen't matter :oops: (shurrup Caz!) It's what you can see that counts. Could you see Cassini and a band across the disc? Did it look nice and sharp? A 6mm might be a bit of a waste of money. You will be getting less magnification that the 10mm with barlow and 6mm with barlow would be too much for good viewing. A 7.5 would do the trick if you can find one at the right price. Their is and Antares Elite 7.5 which is supposed to be very good but might be a bit pricey for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 I have the 10mm Elite and the views are crystal clear through it! The standard skywatcher plossls are OK, but nothing fantastic (hey, they're free!!).Also, would recommend the orthoscopics for planetary. I have the 5mm version and again, cracking views. Gaz has an entire shop-full so could offer more advice here.P.S. GREAT scope you have there Jaffa :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 IMHO with those eyepieces the next buy should be a 32mm or a 40mm for those widefield views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 I was thinking that Gaz, he's got himself pretty much well covered with the Mags he can get now. A nice 40mm ep would be my choice then at a later date upgrade the 10mm ep and poss the Barlow to an orion 2x apo barlow...James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonCopestake Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 I myself am looking out for a nice 32mm eyepiece, although it seems the best ones are 2" and start to get expensive (which for me is over £30!). Any surgestions on decent 32mm 1.25" eyepieces that are cheap and half decent? My seeing is usually terrible and i have lots of light pollution so it's pointless me spending lots of money on a APO 1/10th wave etc gear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 The 6mm won't show you anything the 10mm doesn't when Barlowed and the nights when you can Barlow the 6mm in that scope will be rare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Any surgestions on decent 32mm 1.25" eyepieces that are cheap They sell the Celestron 32mm on Ebay for 15 quid, I've got one and they are great for the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 32mm Celestron eyepiece.http://tinyurl.com/kyuj219 quid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warthog Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 With a 200mm scope, your max power is 400x, under good clear skies with amazing seeing and transparency. As it's an f/5 scope, you can obtain this power with a 2.5mm eyepiece (f-ratio/2 gives the ep length that will maximize your scope.) It's possible to get a little more out of a good scope on a good night. Caz reported pushing her scope above its max about a week ago. Your most comfortable viewing will probably be at a lower power, such as that provided by the 5mm ep others have suggested, but a 2x Barlow would put you at maximum on a good night.After a while, you'll find that magnification isnt' everything.Congratulations on a good scope, and a good first light! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonCopestake Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Actually, thats a bargin Gaza link for anyone else interested: 32mm Celestron Plosslhttp://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-CELESTRON-32mm-PLOSSL-1-25-Telescope-Eyepiece-Lens_W0QQitemZ7597061311QQcategoryZ3636QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 http://www.scopesnskies.com/prod/antares/eyepiece/starter-scope/upgrade.htmlMay interest you that there are 3 ep's for 40 quid inc the 32mm ep + 25 and 9mm ep Nice ep's for under 50 quid IMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radioactive Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 I myself am looking out for a nice 32mm eyepiece, although it seems the best ones are 2" and start to get expensive (which for me is over £30!). Any surgestions on decent 32mm 1.25" eyepieces that are cheap and half decent? My seeing is usually terrible and i have lots of light pollution so it's pointless me spending lots of money on a APO 1/10th wave etc gearI have the 32mm celestron + very good value also the Tal 32mm and the 40mm again very good for the money I think you may want to think about a light pollution filter first then take it from there imho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaffa007 Posted March 7, 2006 Author Share Posted March 7, 2006 Thanks everyone, for some great words of wisdom! From reading up I did think the 6mm might be of not much use, thanks Martin B for suggestion of the 7.5mm. As for bigger....... eyepieces [ twinkletoes ], I have had my eye on the Moonfish reviewed in the S&N mag.Well it's raining again, so no more sights for a few days Thanks again all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark RD Posted March 8, 2006 Share Posted March 8, 2006 congratulations on your new scope you will see loads with that.Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted March 8, 2006 Share Posted March 8, 2006 A bit late to this thread...Congrats on your new scope Personally, I'd buy the best 10mm (or thereabouts) that I could afford followed by a 30+mm and a barlow; if you prefer to stick with 1.25" fitting then I can recommend the Meade Series 4000 32mm Super Plossl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albireo380 Posted March 8, 2006 Share Posted March 8, 2006 Very late to this thread. Your thoughts about the moonfish EP are good - I haven't used one, but the get a good crit.Enjoy your new 'scope (you are already). Clear skies !!Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambermile Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 ... even later to this thread! If you don't push the ep all the way into the barlow you will get a bigger image. Focus may be an issue though but it's a given that the further away the ep is from the barlow lens the more magnification you will get.arthur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom.yates Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Congrats on the new set up ,I would go for wide field say a 40mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.