Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Thoughts on which imaging rigs to concentrate on


Gina

Recommended Posts

Well there's not a lot of OIII in Orion!  Just the stars and M42, and some in the Rosette but can't see much else.  This seems to be a general thing - so much more Ha than anything else.  I don't think there's much point in increasing exposure.

Edited by Gina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll leave the imaging system taking OIII 60s subs overnight (what's left of it) and go to bed.  I'll process the OIII and play with the Ha star removal and subtraction tomorrow (later today actually).

Night all :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a beautiful Orion with the Ha 3nm. It's amazing how small the stars are in comparison to using the L filter. I can't wait for mine to arrive so i can have a go at the Rosette Nebula. However, it looks like your Ha 5nm filter is not parfocal as the image looks out of focus.

I was also thinking overnight about how to balance the image intensities so subtraction would remove the Ha from the image. I think the subtraction needs to be done in the linear state but some stretching might be needed to equalise the Ha intensity (or match background intensities). Otherwise you'll also see the difference in transmissions between the two filters and not just the different bandwidths. I wonder it you could measure the intensity around the Horsehead in one image and stretch the other to get a matching value? Or would you just add a constant value to the entire image to equalise (given it's linear and you want it to remain linear)? So if the background had an intensity of 0.1 in the first image and 0.15 in the second, to add a fixed 0.05 to the entire image in the second. I guess comparing the values in a few areas where there should be no Ha or N, or where there is only Ha to ensure they remain in balance?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes indeed. I was surprised to see rings instead of dots for the Ha 5nm indicating it's out of focus - I did think they would be parfocal so didn't check.  Might be clear again tonight so I'll have another go and refocus.

I too have been thinking about how to correct for variation in intensity and contrast when subtracting images.  This is undoubtedly going to be tricky.  Yes, the images must remain linear but I agree will most likely need matching in both intensity level (offset) and contrast (multiplier).  There is supposed to be a PI function to do just this for matching up RGB images but I don't think I'll rely on that as previous usage has not proved very good on RGB.  Forget what it's called ATM - PI naming doesn't quite match my logic :D

Once I have good focus on both sets of images I plan to take the integrated images, match using StarAlignment then play with PixelMath to try to match them up.  I think this is going to be interesting :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Just refocused the Ha 5nm and it's all of 25 counts away from the 3nm filter (-23 counts v +3 counts).  Amazing!  It's as if the filter was a different thickness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now capturing images with the new focus position and have also adjusted the framing slightly to include a previously unseen object near to the Rosette Nebula - there is nothing on the other side of the image being lost in this readjustmant of FOV.

Here is an auto-stretch of a single 60s frame in PI.

Orion 5nm Ha 01.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Focus is alright now but the field is not flat or may be slightly tilted - stars are elongated in the RHS of the frame.  I plan to retake at least 100 of both 5nm and 3nm Ha subs with the new framing.

Edited by Gina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

109 Ha 5mn subs captured - 103 passed Blink and now calibrating.  Currently capturing Ha 3nm subs having refocused - it was 1 count different from yesterday (now +4 counts).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finished integration :)  Auto-stretched integrated image in PI.  Some amp glow not fully subtracted but not too bad.  Angelfish looks like an alien :D

Orion 5nm Ha 02.png

Edited by Gina
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have plenty of data from last night to process :)  I gave up relatively early as I couldn't find anything else to image with that FOV - everything of interest had sunk out of view.  I think I've now exhausted the available views with the current 28mm lens so planning to change lenses for tonight hoping that the sky will remain clear.  Have to have a good think about what to image :D 

I have realised why I was having a problem with M42 - I'm now not using high clipping as M42 is expected to saturate in order to capture other DSOs in Orion.  So I might have another go at Orion - Flame through Horse's Head to M42 area.

I would normally take flats but the images captured since the clean-up and lens change are not showing dust bunnies or any vignetting so there seems no need to bother (unless data processing from last night shows a problem).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update...  109 Ha 5nm subs processed last night.  That leaves Ha 3nm subs of Orion, Barnard's Loop etc. and other odds and ends to be checked with Blink and further processed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.