Second Time Around

I encountered the same problem and solved it with a Glatter parallizer. This allows 1.25 inch eyepieces and lasers to be fitted into 2 inch focusers and hold them without slop. It works very well with my Baader Diamond Steeltrack and my Hotech laser.

VAT goes to central government. HMRC inspects the books from time to time of those businesses whose turnover is above the threshold to pay VAT. Local taxes are paid by businesses and the public in addition to VAT and paid direct to local councils. They're based on property values.

Like others above my prescription changes yearly, especially the astigmatism angle. In fact the latter changes during the course of the year. For that and many other reasons I don't wear glasses at the telescope but correct my astigmatism with a Televue Dioptrx. With this I can correct the angle at the scope. It's often suggested that astigmatism gets somewhat worse in low light. I therefore tested this by comparing a 0.75 dioptre Dioptrx as per my prescription against a 1.00 Dioptrx. The latter was indeed better. It's not just astigmatism that usually needs a higher correction in low light. Especially if you're short-sighted you'll probably need greater spherical correction as well. This is called "night myopia". My helpful opticians, Neil Gordon and Co in London, lent me flipper lenses to hold in front of my glasses. I found I needed an extra 0.625 dioptres correction in my left eye and an extra 0.5 dioptres in the right eye at night. I therefore had them make up a special such pair for naked eye astronomy, including an extra 0.25 dioptres astigmatism correction in both eyes.

I put a doubled up hairband on the barrel (an elastic band would work as well). This allows the eyecup to be set and stay put in any position.

Just one word - wow!

My observing eye prescription has 0.75 dioptres of astigmatism. However, I'd read that in low light a greater correction is needed. I therefore did a head to head test with a 0.75 vs a 1.0 Dioptrx. The latter did indeed work out better.

Excellent idea!

I agree that the base not sitting flush isn't perfect. In practice though I haven't found it a problem. However, the short extension to my mind is a plus rather than a minus. A low profile design like this means that the secondary can be smaller for a given fully illuminated FOV, or the FOV wider for a given size secondary. If you have a scope with the focal plane well outside the tube the simple answer is a detachable extension tube on the focuser. I prefer such a location for the focal plane as this gives lots of flexibility for accessories. On my OOUK Dobs the focal plane is 100mm outside the tube, and I find this ideal. Apart from the heavy load that the Diamond Steeltrack accepts, the other feature I like is that, unlike the Moonlight, it has a scale to show the position of the drawtube. I find this very useful when switching around accessories. YMMV.

Teleskop Express in Germany are showing 3x Baader Steeltracks for Newtonians in stock. I use one for very long stacks with a night vision device and they support all this very well.

I've now found a suitable stool in red and white. Go to https://www.amazon.co.uk/GMWD-Telescoping-Telescopic-Lightweight-Adjustable/dp/B096FS9Q59/ref=mp_s_a_1_10?crid=OQXI7P3JYZZD&keywords=rainbow+telescopic+stool&qid=1650338114&sprefix=rainbow+telescopic+stool%2Caps%2C157&sr=8-10

I think for many Starsense Explorer is a game changer. I bought the 70mm refractor for two of my grandkids and was so impressed I bought one myself just for the Starsense Explorer itself. I've now adapted it so that it fits into the finder shoe on all my scopes. However, the DX models have a different phone mounting, and so the adaption will probably be different. There's a long thread on adapting Starsense Explorer to other scopes at https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/362327-starsense-explorer-stand-alone-conversion/

This is of course where the wider FOV of the BCO compared with standard orthos pays off. Luckily, my OOUK Dob mount is lovely and smooth, so nudging is easier than with mass market Dobs. That said, I do track with my equatorial platform when I'm observing one object (such as a planet) for some time. This makes it easier to catch fleeting moments of good seeing. The equatorial platform also costs less than expensive wide field eyepieces!

Yes, the Baader Classic Ortho has been criticised because the very edge of the field of view isn't perfectly sharp. However, I feel this is unfair as the inner 43 degrees (that a standard Abbe ortho has) is just as sharp as the latter. So the extra FOV is just a bonus. Additionally, the volcano top that the 6 and 10mm BCOs have is more comfortable than orthos that don't have this feature.

I eventually got the new style stool after the original order failed to turn up. However, the replacement didn't always fold down completely. After contacting the seller I quickly got a refund and was told to keep the stool. I've now had a chance to take it for a test drive, but unfortunately I can't recommend it. This is because it's unstable when leaning forward, something that could cause an injury or result in knocking your scope over. This has made me revert to the original much more stable model, but there's a silver lining to the story. My Dob is an OOUK one and, like the Bresser First Light, the tube can be rotated. By turning the focuser so that it sticks out from the tube horizontally I've been able to reduce the maximum height of the eyepiece by several inches. This means that, unless I'm using my equatorial platform, my original stool works on my 10in Dob for objects from the horizon right up to the zenith. I've also just bought a red stool for my brother. It's similar but a slightly different design to my original one, but Richard says it's stable and very easy to expand and contract. What's more it's only £19.99. Here's a link: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Booxihome-Telescopic-Generation-Lightweight-Gardening/dp/B08TT848D8 I still can't find one in white or red/white though. Can anyone help here please? Finally, if you need a slightly higher stool Spiel has come up with the ingenious idea of putting it on top of a bucket and securing it with Velcro. Thanks, Brett!

I much prefer a headlamp to a torch. Headlamps are often decried as they shine in the eyes of others. I very rarely observe with anyone else, and so my headlamp doesn't have a chance to shine in anyone's eyes. This is because on the very rare occasions I am with others I'm carrying the headlamp in my hand - just the same as a torch! So a headlamp is multi-purpose, and to my eyes preferable, especially as it keeps 2 hands free. Most also have a variable tilt feature, that's useful when on a desk. Many headlamps are way too bright for astronomy use though. So I insist on ones that can be dimmed right down. I'd recommend one of the inexpensive Black Diamond range that can be set very dim. Moreover, they can be set to always come on with the dimmest red light whichever button you push - so no accidents! The red beam is wide and even, as is one of the two white beams, the other white one being a spotlight. You do need to avoid the higher priced ones that have a battery check on starting up though. This is because they light up an intense blue that'll ruin your dark adaption. Additionally, those with the Powertap feature can be knocked on accidentally. BTW, the so-called Astro models aren't suitable for astronomy as they don't have a red light! Here's a link to the Cosmo 250 on Amazon, that costs about £20 to £25 depending on colour: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Black-Diamond-Cosmo-250-Headlamp/dp/B07S2ZJ6CG However, this model has now been superceded, so I'd suggest the Cosmo 350. Here's a pic in the black/red colour (there's a choice of 5 colours). The Black Diamond website is at https://www.blackdia...shop/headlamps/ I'd add that I also have the Photon Freedom Covert light that Wulfrun referred to. However I rarely use it as the beam is very narrow with 2 uneven rings. It may just be because of the covert nosepiece though. I've hesitated ordering the standard model as it's so expensive to import it from the States. However, Wulfrun has solved that with his link to a UK supplier at a very good price. I've therefore just ordered one, so many thanks!

Here's the March results. Where I've put hazy was during an anticyclone with Saharan sand in the sky. The result was very poor transparency. It wasn't just here, but over a very wide area as reported by others on SGL.

Fabulous!

What a great report! I felt I was almost there with you.

Thanks, Mike. That unfortunately knocks it out for me. Might be good for outreach though, especially if it's parfocal or nearly so. Guests love to be able to zoom into objects like the moon, double stars and globulars.

A night vision device might be worth considering, although very expensive. See the brown Ga-As curve on the graph below.

Thanks. Just signed up.👍

Ah, I see. Thanks.

This Lanthanum zoom sounds interesting. @MikeQ. How parfocal is it compared with the other zooms you've tried? What's the maximum width? I'm wondering whether it can be used in binoviewers. Can the eyecup be removed? If so, what's the diameter under the eyecup? This is to see whether a Dioptrix can be fitted. Many thanks.

I need to make a small correction to my previous post. I do have my Report 112 tripod extended a little bit, but just enough to bring it up to the right level for me to observe sitting on my adjustable height stool. If I didn't need the head in the picture I posted I'd also use an extendable centre column. @Ags. I assume your centre column is non-geared. How easy is it to adjust? As Ags mentioned, the ability to customise is one of the advantages of buying from Berlebach.