Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Laurin Dave

Members
  • Posts

    1,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Laurin Dave

  1. Assuming you have Pixinsight then in the process menu got to Image Inspection .. Subframe Selector and run it on the unstretched stacks .. good luck tonight.. cloud here
  2. Clearly even better Goran.. what increase in SNR did you get, it looks quite significant.. well done.. Do you run more than one system at the same time? Dave
  3. Don't hold your breath, I think it'll take a while! Dave
  4. Lovely Richard.. have just started a two panel mosaic over IC348 and NGC133 based on seeing this the first time around.. it’s a fabulous area.. Dave
  5. A tripod, see what improvements that brings, then have another think .. there’s no rush, it’ll all be back again next year and as others have said stuff is in short supply and maybe QC has dropped
  6. I asked SX about it and they said it was normal for that sensor, so now I do them every 6-8 weeks.. overnight when its cloudy so plenty of opportunity !
  7. Very nice Goran, your dark skies must help with a OSC.. that object lower right is a jellyfish by the way Dave
  8. I have found that with my KAF16200 chip I need to refresh my darks about every 2 months or I get noise pattern issues on Lum and Ha, but never on RGB, probably because they're never stretched hard enough to show.. unfortunately I only found this out after having the camera 18 months.. I seem to remember Brendan reporting that he'd seen something similar with his 16200 camera, which was what put me onto it.. Infuriating! Dave
  9. Yes its all very mysterious, how can a dark have a higher level than a light? Who knows but on occasion they do. Was that with the 460, you've mentioned before how dark the background is with that camera so maybe its pretty close to clipping even on LRGB, clearly your skies are too dark! In Pixinsight you can use PixelMath to add a small pedastal to your integrations which will move the histogram to the right. Dave
  10. Very nice Olly, maybe try adding a Pedastal when you calibrate to prevent black clipping. ASI1600 users have to do this (well I do) to prevent the same. It's there in AstroArt somewhere. Dave
  11. These are the settings I use with my ASI1600, matched Darks, no bias, a pedastal of 150 (to avoid black clipping) and optimisation turned off.. I dont use the sccript and dont know how you'd put these settings in.. When I first got Pi and my ASI1600 I used the BPP and couldn't get it to work so went the manual route... Not saying it cant be set up to work properly I just couldn't figure out how to. Flats calibrated the same way with a Flat Dark HTH Dave Image Calibration CMOS.xpsm
  12. Terry- What calibration settings , darks etc and camera do you use? Dave
  13. Aha your last picture explains my mystery... it fits inside the drawtube! I couldn't figure out from the photos FLO posted how it fitted on to the scope, but I see now its an M74thread. Dave
  14. I have APP, Pixinsight and Photoshop and use all three for various aspects of my processing workflow. As Adam and Spongey have said APP is great for integrations and mosaics and certainly easier to use for that than Pi. Photoshop is brilliant for its layers approach - GIMP does similar and is free I believe so get that. If I were to choose between APP and Pi it would have to be Pixinsight, looks complicated and to some it is, but it is extremely powerful. Again as Spongey has said the books Mastering Pixinsight ($20 for a .pdf and money well spent) and Warren Keller's Inside Pixinsight are great resources to get you up to speed with it. Dave
  15. Thanks Wim... That's down to Photoshops "Shadows Highlights" adjustment.. only discovered it yesterday ... also got RBAs mastering Pixinsight (a lifetimes reading no doubt!) yesterday on your recommendation and thoroughly looking forward to investigating that and finding all sorts of new tools, so thanks for that too,, Dave
  16. Thank you Goran.. I give most of the credit to my Esprit100, shame about the "peripheral lens adjustment screw" spikes but I've seen much worse and Gamma Cass is mag 1.6 or so. Dave
  17. The Ghost of Cassiopeia and Olly's Breaking Wave imaged between the 28th Oct and 6th November when it was clear but as usual in the UK the Moon was about. 25 hrs Ha through the Esprit100SX46 and GT71ASI1600 and 1.5hrs each RGB. Processed in Pixinsight and Photoshop, Ha added to Red in Photoshop blend mode lighten after removing the stars with Starnet++. Thanks for looking, C and C welcome Dave
  18. Whatever dual scope you choose make sure the adjustment saddle (JTD or whatever) can handle the load or you’ll be in differential flex territory .. although short CMOs exposures will help mitigate this
  19. Its been down a few days according to the SX Yahoo group.. they're working to get it fixed maybe email Terry/Michael at SX direct .. email is in the Manual or pm me if you can't find it Dave
  20. Great image Skipper! Lovely colours and lovely stars... Dave
  21. An even better fov match would be an Esprit 80 plus an ASI1600 or better still ASI294mm for slightly bigger fov higher QE and no microlensing... this will provide excellent NB performance.. and might fit your dome better
  22. My empirical experience suggests that the microlensing gets worse as the scope gets slower (or maybe bigger.. ) my f4.8 gt71 is least affected then my f5.5 Esprit100 then my F7 Esprit150.. never seen them with my Samyang 135 at f2.8.. I find the camera very good on narrow band with high numbers of subs giving very smooth backgrounds .. Dave
  23. Very nice Martin, really like the fov, the colours and the way you've brought out the dust.. Dave
  24. ZWO's Sam... (the owner I believe) has said on their Facebook page that they'll be out early next year.. and Sony have announced manufacture of the mono chip, we can but wait.. Dave
  25. Thank you Olly.. After completing (?) M31 I was interested to know how its Hii regions compared to those in M33, particular NGC604 which is second in size in the local group to the Tarantula Nebula and which if it were at the distance of M42 cast shadows at night! Here's a composite of M33 and M31 to scale, it made me think ... What the Milky Way would look like from outside and how lucky we are not to be near one! also following this post maybe my M33 is too blue! Dave ps apologies for the thread hijack
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.