Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

AstroAndy

Members
  • Posts

    663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AstroAndy

  1. AstroAndy

    Bucegi mountains

    If you live there, you must be in imaging heaven. :)
  2. Here is one of mineI..I remember doing a session from my garden, and one in Albury (62x20s @ ISO1600). Beginning of 2013, and of course, I zeroed in on M31. I started out literally timing shots w/ my remote, then I found a software that would automate this process. One thing I remember, I shot a lot of subs (w/ darks, flats, bias), but it was so cold, I got into my car for warmth, later on I found the vibrations had put paid to a number of them, I ended up w/ around 60. Dunno rightly remember the stats, but must have been about 20-30 dfb.
  3. AstroAndy

    Eagle nebula cropped

    NP..you have some good stuff there, you should have seen me starting out, I was literally standing beside my scope w/ a remote control for my camera timing 30 secs for the Andromeda galaxy w/out guiding. As time goes on, you'll get more and more used to it.
  4. AstroAndy

    Eagle nebula cropped

    Here it is..sorry about the wait, I couldn't find a way to put an image in an answer, so I made a album w/ this one img., so you can see it. Pls. let me know when you have looked at it, so I can delete this album again. Andy PS I also did a bit of noise removal
  5. AstroAndy

    Eagle nebula cropped

    Gradient removal takes out gradient, i.e. (uneven) illumination caused by light pollution and vignetting, basically, the "brightness" of the background (where it should be dark). It also takes out color gradient (color brightness which can go from red to green, all in one image,like e.g. red illumination from the guide cam into the imaging cam as happened to this genius << once :S ). It can also take out some noise (graininess), although noise removal is a different step. Normally, flats are taken in twilight (I do mine in the morning, after imaging, at about 1/180 -1/250 of a second, although one reads that maybe the exposure should be longer). One can also stick a white t-shirt in front of the imaging scope, hold a flashlight to it, and take "t-shirt flats" inhouse. There is another method which I use, and that is to create flats from either each image (a lot of work), or from a stacked, precalibrated image (less work). This is what I did w/ yours. Here are 2 tutorials of the methods I used: http://ccdastro.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/gradient_removal.htm Shortly, I'll upload the 2 results I got, once I figure out how to get these imgs in here in the answer section.
  6. AstroAndy

    Eagle nebula cropped

    This pic. has potential. :). Do you mind if I grab it and do a gradient removal?
  7. Flats make a lot of difference, they even out the illumination, take out (some of) the gradient, and also even out impuritities on the sensor. One can also make a flat from a pic, there are various ways. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=gradient+removal&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb&gfe_rd=cr&ei=ZmwlVLmAM_Cq8wfSwIKQAw
  8. From the album: Canon EOS 1100D Images

    M31, reprocessed, 5 and 10m exposures 18 frames (don't know the integration time anymore, neither the no. of flats and bias I messed around with this so much). I decided to keep it real on this one (I'm won't to overprocessing in my light-polluted area, so I don't even lose one filament of detail). After changing the file name on the subs,(RAW to Tif), resizing and cropping, I made a gradient removing flat for each of them, and processed them normally after flat application / subtraction. I forewent chasing details in favor of nice values, such as RGB 23/23/23, or as near as I could come to when processing, to find a blend between detail and a pleasing view.
  9. From the album: 2nd Album

    NGC 7331, an inclined spiral galaxy at about 40 mil light years in the constellation Pegasus. 20m, 15m 10m, 5 &3m one exposure each, integration time (unfortunately) only 53min, 90darks, flats and bias frames.
  10. Wow. Insanity rocks. When I grow up, I wanna be like Jonas.
  11. Ty, it's my fave object.
  12. AstroAndy

    First ever pic, M42

    You see something, there is detail, I'd call it a success. :)
  13. If my first attempts had been looking like that, I'd have been happy. :) As to curves and levels, they bring out highlights, midtomes, and shadows (bright, medium, dark areas in the pic). Curves are interesting because you can set points on them (with the eyedropper tool you can measure the darkness, brightness of things). I'm not an expert, but what I do is measure a dark point on the sky, set the value in curves (what you dio is click shift (or ctrl) when you are on the desired value, and have curves up, and it sets a point), then, set another point directly on curves, eg. my value is 10, then set another point @ 20). This "fixes" the darkness level, and you can cheerfully work away on img. details. I don't know whether I'm explaining myself well, maybe this helps: http://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-editing/levels-curves/ Clear skies.
  14. From the album: 2nd Album

    The Whirlpook Galaxy, designation NGC 5194 (M51) at about 25mil lightyears, an interacting Grand Design Spiral in Canes Venatici. 2x20m, 8x10m exposures calibrated w/ 20x10min darks 47x5min darks (because I didn't have any more 10m ones), 269 flats, 60 bias, preprocessed in DSS, processed in PS CS2.
  15. From the album: Canon EOS 1100D Images

    M31, designation NGC 224, the Andromeda Galaxy, with companion galaxies M32 (NGC 221, near), and M110 (NGC205, far),at about 2.5 lightyears from Earth. one of the best known galaxies to us. Shot w/ Canon EOS 1100D 300mm lens at ISO800, f/5.6, these are 26x5m, 3x10m and 6x3m esposures, calibrated w/ith 154 dark frames (about 50 for each exposure length, 56 bias, and 21 flats.
  16. AstroAndy

    ic1396bi

    IC it, too. :)
  17. AstroAndy

    M27

    Round stars, color info., structure recognizable, only a bit of gradient, seems like you hit all the right points,,especially for a first img (DSO)..as to PS, we've all been there, it'll come with time.
  18. From the album: Canon EOS 1100D Images

    M45, reworked a little bit to get the gradient out, 42x3m, 31 dfb at 300mm ISO800, f5/6.
  19. From the album: Canon EOS 1100D Images

    M31, shot under less than ideal conditions, towards a lit street with 3/4 of the moon up, 20x3m (1hr) at 75mm, cal. 31dfb, preproc. DSS, final workup PS CS2, PHD guiding w/ QHY5 Mono cam.
  20. From the album: 2nd Album

    M81, designation NGC 3031, at 12million lightyears. 2h40min composite exposure at 10m, 15m and 5m each subexposure.
  21. Ty, (I never saw this comment until now), had an ok night that night, where everything styed in balance. :)
  22. From the album: 2nd Album

    M33, 1x30m calibrated with 22 10m darks, 31 bias, and 29 flats.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.