Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M42


philj

Recommended Posts

What with bad weather and ill health, last night was the 1st imaging session I have been able to do in a month.

I wanted a subject that would test the WO MK4 flattener working with the 1000d on the 102ED at F7 and M42 fills the sensor up nicely so away I went. I was hoping for more time before the mist set in but only managed 2 hours at ISO 800.

Darks and flats calibration, no cropping at all, this is what came out the camera. A few curves and levels with a couple of Noels actions but thats about it on the processing front.

I'm happy that the field of the 102 is now tamed. A bit pricy and one heck of a lump but the WO MK4 works well.

Philj

post-14930-133877420814_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that IS good. The flattener thing is always a nightmare. Ian King tells me sometone tried the new WO adjustable one on a 127 Meade and found it wanting. Have you tried it on yours yet? It has done a great job here.

I might be inclined to select just the brighter parts of the image for a bit of Unsharp Mask because the data looks really strong. Anyway, a great return to the cold and dark!

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Olly

Yep Ive tried the Mk4 on the 127 but it doesnt really need it I feel. I also found it difficult to focus, I think that was down to me really but I had no problems on the 102. This Mk4 is the adjustable one and works well on the 102 and my ZS80

I had a bash with teh unsharp mask and its tightened things up a bit more, thanks for the tip. I very rarely sharpen my images but in this case its made quite a difference.

Phil

post-14930-133877420845_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for teh kind comments guys. It was nice to get out imaging again and so nice to have a clear couple of hours on M42. It seems like its always been a battle against the weather for me in the past when imaging this subject, just so nice to have a good bash at it. Is it too much to ask for another couple of clear hours to add some more data do you reckon:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really great shot Phil, it reminds me that I must give a go at M42 before spring ;-).

Just one question: you didn't mention but you took different framesets for the trapezium area and the outer part I suppose. How did you distribute the total exposure between them ?

cheers,

Janos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really great shot Phil, it reminds me that I must give a go at M42 before spring ;-).

Just one question: you didn't mention but you took different framesets for the trapezium area and the outer part I suppose. How did you distribute the total exposure between them ?

cheers,

Janos

Hi Janos

Yep forgot to mention I processed the main 2 hour image then composited in ps the burnt out core with a stack of 10 30 second exposures. No9t really enough, should have done some 1 minutes as well but by the time I had the 2 hours the cloud was coming in.

Phil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks George

Heres my last process, sharpened only M42, ironed and removed some green from the background.

A bit better but I darent do anymore, I am trying to get out of the overprocessing habit.

post-14930-133877421375_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.