Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Our return to the Moon.


maw lod qan

Recommended Posts

  I've really been, anxious, to see progress with the Artemis program. I guess I'll just have to be patient.

I can't stop thinking that our first manned launch was in '61. The next year, the President made his famous speech, to the moon and back, safely, before the end of the decade.

With pencils, paper, sliderules, and hand drafting, we went thru Mercury, Gemini and then Apollo. We kept his schedule.

Now, working with advanced computers, existing knowledge and designs we seem to struggle more now.

Artemis's first launch was delayed 6 years. Even now, the heat shield is being questioned. 

I hate to even mention, budget concerns!

Do you think it will be possible for them to get things going even close to the schedule?

Time's a-wasting! Some of use are growing old!

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just a kid through the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo era but as I have read more about those days and the immense problems that were overcome in such a short space of time my respect for those achievements just keeps on growing.

Technology has advanced so much since the but where are the real challenges to harness it? “I think this nation should commit itself to having Tik Tok at everyone’s fingertips before the decade is out” doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.

Of course one could argue we have more pressing problems closer to home now but there is no cohesive commitment to fixing them, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have very vague memories of Apollo 11.  I can remember watching it on a black and white tv.  I remember the rocket liftoff and maybe some of the surface videos.  Why reinvent it, because that is what we do.  We are just stupid that way lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad it is not just me who thinks the new NASA package is Apollo again!

This is all from memory, not referenced. To get the 60s technology into perspective....

The first pictures of the far side of the moon were taken using film, which was on board processed.
Then shown to a really basic TV camera for slow data rate transmission to home.

Sir Patrick Moore, an amateur stargazer, TV presenter and author, spent time in the USA squinting through the eyepiece of a decent scope in a clear sky, so NASA would have a decent map.

Apollo11 was filmed in monochorme because a colour video cmeara was a huge clumsy thing.
First time they used colour on a later mission, it fried when pointed at the sun.

Half a century later, come on NASA, just what are you playing at?

Just copy some of the SpaceX ideas to get you going.
Well maybe not filling LEO with satellite clutter.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sunshine said:

What baffles me to no end is the fact that this is literally being reinvented some 60 years later.

But without the strong incentive that Russian ambitions on the moon created back then.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John said:

But without the strong incentive that Russian ambitions on the moon created back then.

 

 

  Yes, I purposely left out that incentive.

  And the fact that once again,  nothing is being saved and reused.

  I feel as if this is being looked at like another chance for the "Ole boys" to fill their piggy bank.

  Yes, it is to fill the night sky with clutter, but SpaceX is launching a rocket a week, if not more!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just about remember Apollo, the Apollo applications project is more of a memory, and of course Skylab.

I can’t see the point of further Moon landings unless they lead to a mission to Mars, which I wholeheartedly support.

I think Kennedy said about Apollo something like,

”We do not yet understand the benefits these endeavours will give us”

Currently reading Andrew Chaikin’s “A Man  on the Moon” for the 3rd time, highly recommended.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea is for Artemis to dock with the coming Lunar Gateway space station . Then board the Space X lander to get to the moons surface. All this by 2025. Where is the complete and tested Gateway station. Is the Space X lander going to be ready? I'm not sure that the next astronauts to land on the moon will be American. Nor that it will happen in the foreseable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I well remember, many years ago, while in the USA an argument started in a local paper about the cost of space programs and how it all was a waste of money etc.

I think it was a NASA accountant who published a reply which went something like this. 

A high proportion of NASA money goes into wages which are taxed so some gets returned. The goods and services they buy are also taxed. The people involved demand that local facilities such as hospitals, schools and support facilities be improved which benefits all.  local support business are created and grow and create employment which generates local revenues and taxes. Higher education is stimulated which leads to advanced technologies further down the road.

I wish I had cut it out and kept the reply as it was a masterful rebuke of the waste of money comments.  

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tomatobro said:

wish I had cut it out and kept the reply as it was a masterful rebuke of the waste of money comments

I expect there are lots of figures banded about, many of them inaccurate ( including possibly this one), but I think heard from a popular scientist that there has been a 7:1 return on expenditure during the Apollo period.

In terms of new technologies etc,

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a question of priorities. Apollo took the lions share of NASA total budget in the 70s which was running close to 4% of the US federal budget in some years.

Currently NASA's budget is 0.5% of the US budget, and I bet Artemis is just a small part of it. You can tell everything is going to be done on the cheap.   

Edited by Nik271
typos corrected
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I've read that the first manned Starliner launch will be next year, no earlier than March.

Boeing is confident it will be able to do its contracted 6 launches to the ISS before it is decommissioned in 2030!

I need to call my doctor! She ask me this past Thur at my annual old guy exam if I was depressed! I said no!

But now, I am really depressed!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.