Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Heart of the Heart with Melotte 15


wimvb

Recommended Posts

Still no astro darkness for another two to three weeks. So, apart from tinkering in my observatory and things to do around the house, I'm reprocessing old data with new tools in the PI toolkit.

This is data that I collected back in 2021, Melotte 15. The Xterminator suite of processes allowed me to create a version that is closer to what I had intended when I captured the data. BlurXterminator for sharpening, StarXterminator to allow stars and nebula to receive their own processes, and NoiseXterminator to clean up.

I even tried GHS stretch but found a much simpler solution to stretch the nebula. After star removal, I simply used Histogram Transformation ("levels" in PS) to bring in the white point and black point for each channel separately (avoiding clipping). After that, some local contrast enhancement and colour saturation boost. Then brought the stars back in (stretched with masked stretch).

ic1805_HaRGB_230801_crop.thumb.jpg.7a894bcb8d06a28d854fed216ac393c8.jpg

I goofed around with the data some more and found a simple way to fake a Hubble SHO palette. If you have a standard HaRGB image, you simply invert it, apply SCNR green, and invert it back. Voila!

The result was a little too "mustard" for my taste, so I blended 50-50 with a version in which I used PixelMath to mix the channels of the original image.

Red: $T[0]

Green: 0.8*$T[0] + 0.1*$T[1] + 0.1*$T[2]

Blue: (2*$T[2] + $T[1])/3

Personally, I like the natural look of the HaRGB image better.

Btw, that blue patch int middle of the image is not an artefact. It shows in Aladin's SDSS plates. But I couldn't find a reference or ID for it.

shoso.thumb.jpg.646fcbf4fd74a0529897ca76463036f4.jpg

Edited by wimvb
  • Like 26
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, peter shah said:

I love that natural rendition 

Thank you, Peter. I like the natural look better too. Someone on a Facebook group suggested that I do this target in narrowband and create an image in SHO. I don't even have any nb filters other than Ha. So I played with the data and stumbled upon a simple method to completely change the colour scheme of an image. I posted it here just for fun. The natural look with the blue haze is the one that I was aiming for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, windjammer said:

I'll go for the reduced mustard!

I'm glad you like it. This area of the Heart nebula can look fabulous in a proper Hubble palette image with a 3D look to it, but here I was aiming for a natural look. The "mustard version" was more of a coincidence. A nice one though. The Hubble palette is meant to show the abundances of Hydrogen, Oxygen, and metal (Sulphur). But this colour scheme is as far from reality as you can get. Hydrogen under low pressure has a red/magenta glow, while under high pressure, it glows in pink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rgb palettes rule.  I love them.  Unrequited love, I’m afraid (a couple of  dalliances, but overall I am a male spinster).  Interesting the you have succeeded in faking a Hubble palette from HaRGB.  The other way I am familiar with (mostly with bicolor).  Your HaRGB is sweet. I have incorporated the 3 RC tools into my work flow in a semi- religious fashion. I find them incredible.  Your acquisition skills and processing expertise came together for this one
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rodd said:

Rgb palettes rule.  I love them.  Unrequited love, I’m afraid (a couple of  dalliances, but overall I am a male spinster).  Interesting the you have succeeded in faking a Hubble palette from HaRGB.  The other way I am familiar with (mostly with bicolor).  Your HaRGB is sweet. I have incorporated the 3 RC tools into my work flow in a semi- religious fashion. I find them incredible.  Your acquisition skills and processing expertise came together for this one
 

 

Thank you for your kind words, Rodd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, wimvb said:

Still no astro darkness for another two to three weeks. So, apart from tinkering in my observatory and things to do around the house, I'm reprocessing old data with new tools in the PI toolkit.

This is data that I collected back in 2021, Melotte 15. The Xterminator suite of processes allowed me to create a version that is closer to what I had intended when I captured the data. BlurXterminator for sharpening, StarXterminator to allow stars and nebula to receive their own processes, and NoiseXterminator to clean up.

I even tried GHS stretch but found a much simpler solution to stretch the nebula. After star removal, I simply used Histogram Transformation ("levels" in PS) to bring in the white point and black point for each channel separately (avoiding clipping). After that, some local contrast enhancement and colour saturation boost. Then brought the stars back in (stretched with masked stretch).

ic1805_HaRGB_230801_crop.thumb.jpg.7a894bcb8d06a28d854fed216ac393c8.jpg

I goofed around with the data some more and found a simple way to fake a Hubble SHO palette. If you have a standard HaRGB image, you simply invert it, apply SCNR green, and invert it back. Voila!

The result was a little too "mustard" for my taste, so I blended 50-50 with a version in which I used PixelMath to mix the channels of the original image.

Red: $T[0]

Green: 0.8*$T[0] + 0.1*$T[1] + 0.1*$T[2]

Blue: (2*$T[2] + $T[1])/3

Personally, I like the natural look of the HaRGB image better.

Btw, that blue patch int middle of the image is not an artefact. It shows in Aladin's SDSS plates. But I couldn't find a reference or ID for it.

shoso.thumb.jpg.646fcbf4fd74a0529897ca76463036f4.jpg

>>

Still no astro darkness for another two to three weeks. So, apart from tinkering in my observatory and things to do around the house, I'm reprocessing old data with new tools in the PI toolkit.

This is data that I collected back in 2021, Melotte 15. The Xterminator suite of processes allowed me to create a version that is closer to what I had intended when I captured the data. BlurXterminator for sharpening, StarXterminator to allow stars and nebula to receive their own processes, and NoiseXterminator to clean up.

I even tried GHS stretch but found a much simpler solution to stretch the nebula. After star removal, I simply used Histogram Transformation ("levels" in PS) to bring in the white point and black point for each channel separately (avoiding clipping). After that, some local contrast enhancement and colour saturation boost. Then brought the stars back in (stretched with masked stretch).

ic1805_HaRGB_230801_crop.thumb.jpg.7a894bcb8d06a28d854fed216ac393c8.jpg

 

>>I goofed around with the data some more and found a simple way to fake a Hubble SHO palette. If you have a standard HaRGB image, you simply invert it, apply SCNR green, and invert it back. Voila!<<

What an absolutely brilliant trick!  I had a go on your image and it works a treat! (hope you don't mind).  I will put this in my toolbox.

inverttrick_bc.jpg.ea13e7c5e1dfbd41a995deaa5a25ea24.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, alan potts said:

Superb as usual and Olly saying that tells us all something.

Alan

 

3 hours ago, Lee_P said:

There are corkers, good job!

 

2 hours ago, simmo39 said:

V nice! Getting me in the mood for darkness!

Thank you very much, all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, windjammer said:

What an absolutely brilliant trick!  I had a go on your image and it works a treat! (hope you don't mind).  I will put this in my toolbox.

(Don't mind at all.) I'm glad you find it useful. SCNR removes one of the primary colours, red, green or blue. If you invert an image first, it removes the corresponding complementary colour, cyan, magenta, or yellow. In this case, the image didn't have much bright and solid red in it, as many Ha images tend to have. That's why it was easy to remove the dominant red/magenta and get something which looks like a Hubble palette.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.