Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Hadley, Tycho and Clavius with Skymax 180


Nik271

Recommended Posts

Last night (22 March) the seeing was superb despite the light mist. I spent an hour gazing at the Moon with my Skymax 180 using about 300x magnification and still enjoying steady views. I thought I even got a glimpse of parts of the elusive rille running through Vallis Alpes! I was so impressed that I took the trouble to attach my DSLR and shoot two 2minute videos (about 3000 frames each) at prime focus. After the usual processing this is what I got. I think the Skymax did well for a 7 inch scope :)

 

Tycho and Clavius near the terminator:

159980767_TychoandClavius.thumb.jpg.0cafab6233fac78202e5333418bee377.jpg

 

Vallis Alpes was on the edge of the frame and did not come out as sharp but still I think there is a hint of the central rille:

 

1272149105_AlpineValley.jpg.21c95a3030bf38e6f0a9942bde7e6648.jpg

And finally Montes Apenines with Rima Hadley. It looked just as good visually :)

Appenines2.thumb.jpg.23f3c37379edb7f686495890ae5bdf69.jpg

Lets hope for some more good seeing like this 🤞 

 

Clear skies!

 

Nik

Edited by Nik271
  • Like 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kirkster501 said:

Excellent pictures. well done.

Were you using a barlow or was this at native?

Thank you! I didn't use a barlow, so the focal distance was 2700mm. I'm focusing manually and I found that when I use a barlow then its much harder to get the precise focus because the mirror shift becomes very noticeable. The scope is at F15 and my DSLR pixels are 3.7 microns, so I thought it may be a bit undersampled for lucky imaging. So I tried the x1.5 drizzle in Autostakkert and it worked well on the first image. Still learning this stuff :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nik271 said:

Thank you! I didn't use a barlow, so the focal distance was 2700mm. I'm focusing manually and I found that when I use a barlow then its much harder to get the precise focus because the mirror shift becomes very noticeable. The scope is at F15 and my DSLR pixels are 3.7 microns, so I thought it may be a bit undersampled for lucky imaging. So I tried the x1.5 drizzle in Autostakkert and it worked well on the first image. Still learning this stuff :)

Yes it worked very well.  Well done.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.