Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

AR2759 in High Res Again | HA & CaK | April 4th 2020


MalVeauX

Recommended Posts

Heya,

Woke up to another fairly good sky, figured I'd take a look again. AR2759 has diminished and its umbra of the spot is very tiny now, a mere pore. The AR is still lively with a good plage and filaments but the sunspot is virtually gone at this point. Seeing was pretty good, lots of sub-arc-second time, so I grabbed information on the AR and local larger prominences. I finished up with a partial disc to showcase the AR and the two main prominences this morning at a courser scale.

High res data gathered from a 150mm achromatic doublet refractor with an internal sub-aperture D-ERF, 50mm, in the focuser before the filters. No front mounted ERF/D-ERF needed and the local seeing and OTA seeing conditions were not an issue as atmospheric seeing was good and the resolution was realized.

I gathered all this data in each wavelength & image scale in 24 minutes, with the same 24 minutes recorded in the SSM to show seeing conditions through the entire fast session. No waiting around or hunting for seeing as it was pretty consistently good. SSM data provided below with times of capture; note the SSM was not used to trigger, merely to measure seeing.

Colored:

49734491018_1850b00b20_b.jpg

49735034821_afb0248e58_b.jpg

49735360842_3b121c3b3c_b.jpg

49735355782_6b34fea8c5_b.jpg

49735355577_9997049795_b.jpg

49734485678_07ec6cc51d_b.jpg

49735354472_34711c379b_b.jpg

49735358027_bdb3f18339_b.jpg

49734488448_81cfabb20f_b.jpg

B&W:

49734491763_c4213396c0_b.jpg

49735360217_58036d4538_b.jpg

49735361127_7e492f6436_b.jpg

49735356212_afa3f0467a_b.jpg

49734487208_70eccb3f57_b.jpg

49734486453_81b0a72f7c_b.jpg

49735354922_bb3bf6a2e5_b.jpg

49735034381_14eaa4b58d_b.jpg

49735358547_15dbf241ba_b.jpg

Seeing Conditions (SSM data; plenty of sub-arc-second seeing today; no issues with local seeing conditions from environment, observatory walls, OTA internal turbulence, etc).

SeeingConditions_04042020.thumb.jpg.5c3eefe8c6d93817a359c72bdc835f73.jpg

Equipment:

CR150HD 150mm F8 Doublet Achromatic Refractor with Baader Glasspath 1.25x (F10)
Baader Red CCD-IR Block Filter, 2", as internal sub-aperture D-ERF in focuser
PST etalon + BF10mm + ASI290MM for High Res HA
Baader Blue CCD-IR Block Filter, 2" as internal sub-aperture D-ERF in focuser
Lunt Cak B1200 + 2x Barlow + ASI290MM for High Res CaK

ED80 + SM60II DS Etalon + PST Etalon + BF10mm + ASI290MM for partial disc HA

Solarsetup_04042020.jpg.8759c49108595f1e6bf1b60605d90682.jpg

Very best,


 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Altocumulus said:

 

 

ps. what do you use your Lunt Cak module in - the 150mm?

Hello, yes, I use it with the 150mm F8 achromatic doublet, sometimes I mask to 120mm F10, today was 150mm F16. I use a Baader Blue CCD-IR Block filter in front to handle additional thermal load.

Very best,

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MalVeauX said:

Hello, yes, I use it with the 150mm F8 achromatic doublet, sometimes I mask to 120mm F10, today was 150mm F16. I use a Baader Blue CCD-IR Block filter in front to handle additional thermal load.

Very best,

Thanks -  I know Lunt recommend <100mm, so wondered how you managed to counter the extra size. Do you know what the

tolerance is on that < 100mm - +/- 10mm (say)? I'm going to assume a 102 isn't stretching things too much - thinking ahead a wee bit now.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Altocumulus said:

Thanks -  I know Lunt recommend <100mm, so wondered how you managed to counter the extra size. Do you know what the

tolerance is on that < 100mm - +/- 10mm (say)? I'm going to assume a 102 isn't stretching things too much - thinking ahead a wee bit now.....

100mm is 102mm frankly for this purpose. The idea is to maybe consider a D-ERF of some kind, in front of the Lunt module, when going into the 120~150 or larger apertures (assuming refractor). For any other design, a full D-ERF is needed anyways (Newtonian, SCT, Mak, etc). But refractors are ideal (the longer the focal ratio, the better, for 393nm performance).

Very best,

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.