Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep9_banner.thumb.jpg.05c1bdd298547fd225896a3d99c9bc17.jpg

Fraunhoffer

Confused with aperture, & exit pupil - what will I see?

Recommended Posts

lets imagine I wasn't to see a nice DSO about 15' size and I think it should look good nicely framed with a 1 deg field of view in the EP..

Which would give the better (or higher probability of seeing anything at all ) view from a semi urban light polluted home site (e.g Bortle 6)?

a) an 100mm f/6 refractor (fl 600mm) and a 10mm EP (60 deg afov, gain 60x = fov pf 1 deg)
(and exit pupil of 100mm / 60 = 1.6mm)

or

b) a  200mm SCT with focal reducer to give f/6 (fl 1200mm) and a 20mm EP (60 deg afov, gain 60x = fov of 1 deg)
(and exit pupil of 200 / 60 = 3.3mm)

My gut feeling is that the SCT should give a better view just based upon its 2xaperture - but Im not sure I understand fully the maths why.
Is the larger exit pupil going to result in a better / brighter / more successful view?
Or will the view be 'roughly' the same ?
Or have I got it all wrong.....

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exit pupil is eyepiece focal length / telescope focal ratio.

Exit pupil is the size of the light beam not the size of what it sees. Imagine holding binoculars in your hand, exit pupil is the bright little light patch you see on the area youo would look through.

Whether using a focal reducer effects exit pupil calculation I don't know.

Edited by happy-kat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

Whether using a focal reducer effects exit pupil calculation I don't know.

Yes it does as it effectively reduces the focal length of the scope so reduces the focal ratio resulting in a larger exit pupil.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With 2x the aperture a 200mm scope actually has 4x the light gathering area of a 100mm aperture so it's going to show DSO's better.

With SCT's and mak-cassegrains the long focal length restricts the size of the true field of view that is attainable so larger DSO's may not fit into the field of view. But if it can fit in, it should be brighter and more detailed than in a 100mm aperture scope.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The SCT and focal reducer is superfluous to what I was trying to work out.

I was trying to understand why the larger aperture scope would give the better view. Since they both have the same overall F ratio in this example and the fov using the 2 eyepieces is the same.
Im thinking that (assuming the eye pupil remains fully open and is larger than the exit pupil)  the exit pupil is effectively controlling the aperture of the eye. Since size of the rods/cones are fixed in size (and treating them like a camera sensor) - so the larger exit pupil in this case is allowing the eye to have a higher f/ratio of its own and hence brighter and more differentiated light levels between the background and the subject view.
(as well as more detail due to the higher aperture resolution of the scope - and ignoring any sampling at the eye).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Fraunhoffer said:

The SCT and focal reducer is superfluous to what I was trying to work out.

Yes, I was just answering the question from happy-kat.

In some ways, the more interesting or relevant question is what happens when you keep the exit pupils the same as it directly illustrates the benefit of a larger scope.

Strangely enough, the even the largest scopes cannot make the surface brightness of extended DSOs brighter than they appear with the naked eye. What they can do is maintain brightness at larger image scales which helps with visibility and allows your eye to detect contrast more easily.

In your example, with both scopes giving an exit pupil of 3.3mm, the 100mm refractor will only be giving a magnification of x30. So, the SCT example can maintain the same surface brightness for the object at twice the image scale.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the exit pupil of both telescopes in this example 1.6mm

10/6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

Isn't the exit pupil of both telescopes in this example 1.6mm

10/6

one is 10/6 and the other is 20/6.

exit_pupil = ep.focal_length / (t.focal_ratio)
= ep.focal_lenght / (t.focal_length / t.aperture)
= (ep.focal_length / t.focal_length) * t.aperture
= t.aperture / (t.focal.length/ep.focal_lengh)
= t.aperture / gain

both give the same answer.
sorry for the shorthand.


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Rhushikesh-Canisminor
      Hello!
      I have been really inactive here, so apologies.
      Here are a few images of the Solar Eclipse, happened on 21 June 2020. It was annular, but partial from Mumbai region (around 60% covered). Maximum phase of the eclipse was at around 11:30 a.m. IST.
      This is actually onset of our 4-5 months of monsoon season, so getting decent skies was a tough part. Luckily got decent cleared patches here and there with occasional rains.
      I had to use whatever I had to make a comfortable view of the eclipse, thanks to the lockdown.
      I simply took a box, made a whole of the size of the eyepiece on one end, cut the opposite side and attached a paper. I had to do little bit here and there attachments for perfect angle. But was really happy with the results. 
      One of the best experience was when I was seeing the Sun while it was drizzling at the same time.
      Thanks!
      -Rhushikesh Deshpande.




    • By Varavall
      I am selling my Meade LX90 8" EMC with many accessories due to equipment upgrade, so this lovely scope needs a new home. All in excellent condition; no rust, battery boxes spotless, all motors function perfectly, holds collimation extremely well (only had to collimate once in the past 2 years), when well polar aligned I have achieved 3 minute unguided DSLR exposures.
      What's included:
      Meade LX90 8" EMC (in original Meade foam-filled shipping box)
      Meade 8x50 finderscope
      Meade standard field tripod
       
      Meade equatorial wedge (replacement bolts to hold telescope and adjust azimuth)
      Meade AUDIOSTAR handset (under 2 years old) in original box (Provides much more functionality than the original Autostar)
      Meade UHTC flip-mirror system for photography
      Meade 1.25" eyepieces: 40mm 32mm 26mm 15mm 12.4mm 6.4mm
      Meade 1.25" telenegative amplifier air spaced triplet barlow
      Meade series 4000 1.25" filters x5
      Meade erecting prism and a 90° eyepiece holder
      Celestron 2" Mirror diagonal Starbright XLT with 1.25" adapter in original aluminium case
      Meade #505 cable connector set to connect PC to handset to control mount and update firmware
      Meade ST-4 module for connecting a guide camera to the mount
      Meade handset holder
      Meade front counterweight
      Jessops flight case to hold eyepieces, etc.
      PRICE: SOLD
      Please ask for more photos/information. Price includes shipping to Western Europe. Paypal preferred.

       




      SOLD
    • By StevieH
      Hi all I’m just looking for advice on upgrading telescop. At the minute I’ve got a Meade ETX 125 and had some good views with it so far. Mainly Moon Planets and brighter clusters. However I wanted to see more Galaxies and nebulas which is a much to ask for a F15 scope. 
      im looking at second hand Celestron/Meade 9.25” f10 s With maybe a focal reducer and Sky-Watcher 10”-12” F4.9 dobsonians which is the better choice?
    • By Sonmalul
      There is something that makes me think practicality.  
      We can all agree that a long focal length scope is better suited for planetary use than its short length brother which would be best suited for dso viewing or guiding/photo. 
      We can take those two (refractors) as an example: 90/900 and his brother, a 90/500 (and we will be using Plossl EPs)
      Exit pupil is an important factor in viewing comfort. 
      Exit pupils are dependent on the scope's focal length, the EP's fl and the main lens diameter.  
      For example, to acheive 100x in the 90/500 we will need a 5mm eyepiece and to acheive the same mag in the 90/900 we will need a 9mm eyepiece. 
      The exit pupils of both scopes in those configurations will be 90/100=0.9mm 
      The theoretical magnification limit for both scopes lies at about 180x. 
      It is true that to reach this 180x you will need a 5mm EP in the 90/900 and a "2.8"mm EP in the 90/500 and those will probably make for an eyelash brushing eye relief... But looking at exit pupils up to 100x, those scopes do not seem to complement one another, but rather replace each other.
      So, ignoring abberations, and not taking into account eye relief so much, wouldn't the faster scope be almost as practical and easy on the eyes for high-ish magnifications as the slower, heavier, harder to mount in the wind scope?
      just my evening neurons buzzing...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.