Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Hi 

I have a Skywatcher 200PDS. I managed to get images of saturn, jupiter with the telescope and the ASI120MC-S camera. However, to get a bit more magnified image of these planets I got myself a Barlow Tele Vue 3x and Revelation 5x. I am having trouble with this setup and really disappointed now. I am not able to achieve focus with any of these barlows using my planetary camera. I have added extension etc. but no luck whatsover. I just see a blank black video preview in SharpCap. I have seen people using the same setup and getting good images out of those. Any help highly appreciated.


Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have an out of focus image or no image at all? If it is the latter then the problem could easily be that your object is not centred on your chip. As you add magnification in the form of a Barlow it becomes much more challenging to centre your object.  Try increasing the gain on your image capture to see if part of the fov is brighter, then slew towards this and centre the object. Remember to re adjust your gain before capture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Owmuchonomy said:

Do you have an out of focus image or no image at all? If it is the latter then the problem could easily be that your object is not centred on your chip. As you add magnification in the form of a Barlow it becomes much more challenging to centre your object.  Try increasing the gain on your image capture to see if part of the fov is brighter, then slew towards this and centre the object. Remember to re adjust your gain before capture.

Hi 

Thanks for your reply. What I did was to get the image focused on the chip with out using any barlow and then simply insert the barlow and then tried to focus again. I must mention that I am using HEQ5 pro for tracking. 

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found that with planetary cameras, unless the image of a planet is almost in focus, you can't see anything at all.  I had some trouble till I worked out ways of pre-focusing the system so that the camera would be near focus when I dropped it in.  (I focus my Mak and SCT with the eyepiece held about 6mm out of its normal position, then drop in the camera.) 

It is also possible that with the Barlow in place, your system is not capable of reaching focus - something you can most readily test on the edge of the Moon or a distant terrestrial target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Yogesh said:

Thanks for your reply. What I did was to get the image focused on the chip with out using any barlow and then simply insert the barlow and then tried to focus again. I must mention that I am using HEQ5 pro for tracking.

I use an x3 barlow with a 1200mm scope and an ASI120MC which has the same size chip

My experience is that there's no guarantee this will work, especially with stronger barlows.

I setup using the moon as a target, and get my finderscope VERY accurately aligned using an obvious crater, and tweak once you have a planet in view. I find it is still unlikely that a planet will be on the chip after putting the scope away and getting it out again.

With an x5 barlow, it will be exceptionally demanding to find the planet and exceptional difficult to focus accurately. The action of focusing will probably send the planet out of the field of view until you develop a very delicate touch.

Another trick (if the moon is hidden) is to defocus and use a very long exposure (about a second) and use a bright star (or jupiter/mars) as a target as they  will show a halo even if outside the frame.

The HEQ5 goto will struggle to accurately target planets at that focal length, so setting the finder is a challenge and it must be used. I set the planet in one of the 'corners' of the crosshair's x as when it is hidden by the X it can actually be slightly off centre and the cameras Field of view isn't much bigger than where the crosshairs cross!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Yogesh said:

Hi 

Thanks for your reply. What I did was to get the image focused on the chip with out using any barlow and then simply insert the barlow and then tried to focus again. I must mention that I am using HEQ5 pro for tracking. 

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

 

 

That method is unreliable because the action of placing the Barlow in the image train moves the previously centred image away from the chip. You need to recentre once the Barlow is in place using the method I describe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found that the seeing conditions have never been good enough or steady enough for my x3 Barlow.. it's never been a better image than without it..see it as a waste of time.. Maybe a x2 would be better for me but I'm not going to waste my money trying with a average costing Barlow.i will get a powermate one day.. I see a Barlow as like a high strength ep..as a e.g. a 25mm is going to give you the best views so why try try a 5mm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

I use an x3 barlow with a 1200mm scope and an ASI120MC which has the same size chip

My experience is that there's no guarantee this will work, especially with stronger barlows.

I setup using the moon as a target, and get my finderscope VERY accurately aligned using an obvious crater, and tweak once you have a planet in view. I find it is still unlikely that a planet will be on the chip after putting the scope away and getting it out again.

With an x5 barlow, it will be exceptionally demanding to find the planet and exceptional difficult to focus accurately. The action of focusing will probably send the planet out of the field of view until you develop a very delicate touch.

Another trick (if the moon is hidden) is to defocus and use a very long exposure (about a second) and use a bright star (or jupiter/mars) as a target as they  will show a halo even if outside the frame.

The HEQ5 goto will struggle to accurately target planets at that focal length, so setting the finder is a challenge and it must be used. I set the planet in one of the 'corners' of the crosshair's x as when it is hidden by the X it can actually be slightly off centre and the cameras Field of view isn't much bigger than where the crosshairs cross!

Hi 

 

Thanks a lot for your reply. That is some good tip. I did not really realize untill you mentioned that the fov is that small. I suppose I was taking some things for granted in my head. Thanks! I will try it on the moon to start with next time. 


Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Owmuchonomy said:

That method is unreliable because the action of placing the Barlow in the image train moves the previously centred image away from the chip. You need to recentre once the Barlow is in place using the method I describe.

Thanks again. I really appreciate you replying back. I am definitely going to try what you suggested , increasing the gain and re-centering next time. I will keep this thread updated if i manage to succeed or not . 

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, newbie alert said:

I've found that the seeing conditions have never been good enough or steady enough for my x3 Barlow.. it's never been a better image than without it..see it as a waste of time.. Maybe a x2 would be better for me but I'm not going to waste my money trying with a average costing Barlow.i will get a powermate one day.. I see a Barlow as like a high strength ep..as a e.g. a 25mm is going to give you the best views so why try try a 5mm

Hi 

Thanks for your reply. What is the difference between a barlow and a powermate ? Are you suggesting that in the long run it would be good to get a powermate ? Do you recommend any ?

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Powermate are made by televue..but they also do barlows ..what the difference is I'm not sure..but all  serious  planetary imagers use them..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A barlow spreads the light rays out wider. A powermate magnifies without doing this. This makes it less sensitive to spacing (barlows get more powerful as you increase the spacing) 

Lots of planetary imagers use them because of the quality, but the practical advantages are actually greater for visual astronomers (things like exit pupil size that are irrelevant to imagers).

http://www.televue.com/engine/TV3b_page.asp?id=53&Tab=_app

I wouldn't get too hung up on what to use as even mid-price barlows are very good because they are optically pretty straightforward. I'm only just gettin g to eth point where I'm thinking a better barlow or powermate could improve my planetary imaging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Ryaen
      Hi, I am pretty much new in Astronomy. Recently I have bought Meade Polaris 127mm telescope. The Barlow(2x) which Meade has provided is pretty basic. It gives pretty blurry view.
      I have read few blogs and get to know that for 127mm, 2x-3x magnification is more than enough. Now I’m confused in its specs(element in it).
      Wondering which one I choose, 2.5x Barlow 3 element or 2x Barlow with 2 element to get clear and crisp viewing.
      Ryaen
    • By ntaylorblanchard
      Note on this issue: A suggestion from another forum seems to have found the problem but I'm not sure. It was suggested that after 3 hours my power tank was drained enough to inhibit the operation of the cooler. I attached my second (smaller) power tank and it seems to be working now. Of course the camera sat for awhile before I was given the idea that power was the issue and decided to try a test with a new power source.  If anyone has any additional information or suggestion for me they would be appreciated.  Original issue is below:
       
      HELP PLEASE! ASI294 MC Pro Stopped cooling Also have an image saving issue. I'll try to give as much detail as I can:
      Using APT with an ASI294 MC Pro - CAMERA IS NEW
      Cooler is powered by a Celestron Powertank 17 fully charged connected using an Orion DC cable w/Auto Lighter Plug
      Connecting via ASCOM ASI Camera 1 setting
      Properties are
      Image Type RAW 16
      Bayer RGGB
      Unity Gain
      Gain 120
      Offset 30
      USB limit 40
      The camera is plugged directly into the laptop NOT a USB hub. I believe all my laptops USB ports are USB 2.0
      No other software (such as PHD2) was running.
      No other cameras attached.

      Trying to create a dark library.
      Cooling to -5C from room temp of around 25-30C
      Camera and cooler were working fine for a couple of hours but I then ran into a snag:
       
      I got a time-out message from APT saying "Still waiting image from the camera - 30s" also -
      The cooling stopped working. (Red light indicating power is still on. Fan is still spinning.)
      I'm also noticing that the laptop is making the chime noise it makes when something is unplugged or plugged in.
       
      I tried connecting to the camera just using APT's ZWO camera setting with the same results.
      Black level and USB speed settings were left blank.
       
      Disconnecting and reconnecting everything seems to fix the problem only for a minute then I'm right back into the same problem. Changing USB ports does not help.
       
      I tried using ZWO's "ASI Studio" and I did not seem to have any problems capturing images but the cooler didn't seem to be working. (Power was = 100%)
      I tried using Sharpcap and did not seem to be able to do anything but I'm very unfamiliar with that software.
       
      I went back to APT and tried doing 10 lights exposures of 30 sec each with no power to the cooler. Those went ok. I then connected the cooler. The cooler cooled the camera down to 23.2C then stopped.
      Cooling Aid settings are
      Target -5
      Step 5
      Pause 5
      Timeout 120 (also tried timeout 300)
      Disconnected the cooler and ran another set of 10 30 sec light subs. These went ok. Tried set of 10 10 sec darks without cooler. This also went ok.
      I tried reinstalling the ASCOM drivers from the ASI site, restarted the laptop, restarted APT. Camera cooled from around 30C to 25.3C then stopped cooling (Red light indicating power is still on. Fan is still spinning.) I again started hearing the plugged/unplugged chimes from the laptop.
      So right now this seems to be some issue with the cooling. Is the camera defective?
      While I'm not computer illiterate, I'm not highly technical. I'd appreciate any help or advice but please put it into simple straightforward terms.
    • By Dave Baxter
      Just wondering what other people have experienced with this camera.  I'm using a MacBook Pro, and want to use this camera with my Celestron 8SE.  Primarily interested in the planets and the moon, but some deep sky images would be great if it's up to it.  

      It seems to be out of stock every where, but at $249 is about what I can afford to spend (no income at the moment).  All of the research I've been able to do on this camera indicates it should work well with my set up.
      I'm just curious if you have had any issues or problems.  Thanks in advance!
    • By Ronan Hunt
      Hi All,
      Im looking for preloved zwo asi 183mm Pro or 1600mm Pro and a zwo 8x1.25 inch EFW. Let me know if you have anything suitable. 

      Many Thanks,
      Ronan 
    • By StarGazingSiouxsie
      Hello there  
      My budget for eyepieces is $1,000. 

      I started off thinking I would get a Celestron eyepiece kit for about $200, for example. After trying a few out, I soon realised that I wanted eyepieces of higher quality. My mindset is that I'm investing $2,000 in my telescope, a Celestron 9.25 SCT, and I want to be able to extract from that scope the very best views that I can.

      Wishlist - 
      I'm looking to buy 3 eyepieces maximum (not including a Barlow)
      Ideally - if possible - I would like to get eyepieces that I can use on both my telescopes, but my priority is toward the 9.25" as that is the bigger investment.
      Both my telescopes have 1.25" barrels.
      * Cassie - A Celestron Newtonian. Aperture = 130mm, FL = 650mm, FR = f5  Max useable magnification between 250x and 307x    
      * The Cubble Space Telescope - A Celestron SCT. Aperture = 235mm FL = 2350mm, FR = f10  Max useable magnification between 460x and 550x 
      I don't feel comfortable spending more than about $300 on each eyepiece
      I want these eyepieces to last as long as possible. I try to look after thinbgs if I can.
      Decent eye relief if possible
      I will purchase a Barlow separately
      Field of view - something 60% + 

       
      Usage - 
      My observing will be probably 80% solar system planets & moon, 20% deeper sky objects
      I'm not that in atsrophotogarphy. I have a little Celestron NexImage 10 with which I am hoping to make some videos and stacked images of Jupiter, Saturn and detailed imaging of Pluto (  ) 
      I really just want the WOW factor right now. Enjoying the thrill of Saturn;s rings, tracking Jupiter's 4 main moons, detailed lunar observing etc. 
       
       
      Questions -  
      So what would be your suggestions or advice, please? 
      I have been looking at the Tele Vue Delos & Delite range.  The Nagler range looks nice but I'm note sure if I need 82' field of view. A bit pricey, too. 
      Explore Scientific's offerings are a possibilty.
      What's the deal with zoom eyepieces? Does that mean you can have an eyepiece that will do the job, for example, of a 6mm, 7mm, 8mm and 9mm eyepiece all in one? Is there a trade off?? What's the catch?? 
      Regarding Barlows, I was thinking of just keeping it simple and getting a decent 2x lens without spending crazy money. Something in the $150 range. Or would I need a high end Barlow to complement the better eyepieces I am hoping for??? 
       
      Overall, I'm looking for 2 or 3 eyepieces and 1 Barlow with a $1,000 budget. Any thoughts, ideas, advice or opinions all gratefully received, thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.