Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Iris Nebula NGC 7023 with funny rings


EyeGuy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 hours ago, carastro said:

As an experiment try stacking without the flats.  I know this is not ideal but might help with diagnosis.  Carole

Hi Carole,

Solved (I think)

Your hunch was right on and thanks so much for the very helpful suggestions. It turns out my flats were grossly underexposed - especially in red. I'm using a Gerd Neumann Aurora flatfield, and was just using the camera exposure meter to judge exposure. Mistake. I should have "overexposed" by that metric.

You can see what the camera thought of the exposure in the first image - all channels underexposed, but especially the red. It's funny how the camera exposure meter got that so wrong.

The second is a histogram from IrfanView image viewer showing embarrassingly low exposure of red. I imagine that made it impossible to correct the red light channel.

I extracted the red channel from the flat and gave it a severe stretch and low and behold, out came the ring (image 5) - but as an underexposure, just like you'd expect.

I re-ran the image without the flats as you suggested and there's no sign of the rings (image 4) - even with a massive stretch (image 3)

 

So I guess that probably solves it. That problem has been annoying me for months. Next time I'm out I'll be sure to check the histograms before I take everything down - and I'll post results!

Thanks everyone for chipping in and helping me solve this problem (I hope).

Kind regards,

Barry

PS. for bonus points, can anyone explain why the rings are oval, and not circular???

camera histogram.jpg

flat histogram.jpg

NGC_7203 integration without flats_DBE curves colour.jpg

NGC_7203 integration without flats_DBE curves colour rough.jpg

flat red channel stretched.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, carastro said:

Glad you've got it sorted.  

No idea why it is oval though.  

Carole 

Well, so far just a theory. And on the plus side, I've become much more proficient at DBE in PI. :icon_biggrin:

Barry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.