Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_globular_clusters_winners.thumb.jpg.13b743f39f721323cb5d76f07724c489.jpg

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'fs-128'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Welcome
    • Welcome
  • Beginners
    • Getting Started General Help and Advice
    • Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
    • Getting Started With Observing
    • Getting Started With Imaging
  • Community
    • Official SGL Announcements and Events
    • SGL Challenges and Competitions
    • SGL Star Parties
    • Star Parties & Astro Events
    • Celestial Events Heads Up
    • The Astro Lounge
  • Retailers
    • Sponsor Announcements and Offers
    • FLO Clearance Offers
    • Supplier Reviews
  • Astro Classifieds
    • For Sale / Swap
    • Wanted
  • Equipment
  • Observing
  • EEVA (Electronically Enhanced Visual Astronomy)
  • Imaging
  • Science
  • WADAS's WADAS Discussion Forum
  • Beaufort Club's Topics
  • Swindon Stargazers Club's Topics
  • East Midlands Stargazers''s Topics
  • Central Scotland Astro's Topics
  • SGL Cumbrian Skies's Topics
  • Herts, Beds and Bucks Group's Topics
  • SGL East Anglian Group's Topics
  • South Leicester Observers's Topics
  • South Wales Group's Topics
  • SGL Surrey Observers's Topics
  • South Yorkshire Stargazers's Topics
  • Yorkshire Astronomers's Topics
  • Devon and Cornwall's Topics
  • West Midlands's Topics
  • Essex Cloud Dodgers's Topics
  • Essex Cloud Dodgers's New equipment
  • NLO and Planetarium's Topics
  • Astronomical Society of Edinburgh's Discussion
  • Dorset Stargazers's Topics
  • Hairy Stars Club (Comets)'s Tutorials and Guides
  • Hairy Stars Club (Comets)'s General Discussion
  • Hairy Stars Club (Comets)'s Observing Campaigns
  • Hairy Stars Club (Comets)'s Analysis results
  • Hairy Stars Club (Comets)'s Useful Links
  • Pixinsight Users Club's Pixinsight Discussion Forum

Calendars

  • Astro TV
  • Celestial Events
  • SGL Calendar
  • Astro Society Events
  • Star Parties
  • WADAS's Events
  • Beaufort Club's Events
  • Astronomical Society of Edinburgh's Events
  • Dorset Stargazers's Events

Blogs

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Interests


Location

Found 6 results

  1. Takahashi FS-128 with 0.75X reducer/flattener on Vixen AXD2 mount 45 X 120s with Nikon D750 (90 mins) Processing in PixInsight and Photoshop I think the funny red ring artifact / glare / processing error actually enhances this nebula. Barry
  2. This is a cheeky single 2 minute exposure of M42 taken from the Ballycroy international dark sky site in Co. Mayo in Ireland. I had intended to take a lot more data but that part of the sky was quite cloudy so I moved on. By the time it cleared I felt that M42 was a bit low. Also, M42 is done to death. :-) The corner issue is just due to badly calibrated flats. Can we turn off the city lights now please? Barry
  3. Date taken: 17th March 2018 from Ballycroy International dark sky site Mayo, Ireland Telescope: Takahashi FS-128 Mount: Vixen AXD2 Camera: Nikon D750 45 x 120s subs (90 mins) Reprocessing this image with new flats has greatly improved it compared to my initial results with underexposed flats taken that night - see the post about the Iris nebula. Thanks for looking, Barry
  4. So after Carole helped me to realise that I was taking my flats wrong, I've reprocessed this image and finally the funny rings have vanished. Original thread TL;DR - I was underexposing my flats, which resulted in failure of calibration to remove vignetting, as well as it introducing weird red concentric oval rings. Last night was supposed to be clear, so I set up in the garden. Cue the Irish weather. I only managed to get PA and focus (you know, the most fun bits) and then the clouds rolled in. Anyway, so instead of imaging, I took a bunch of calibration frames. The setup was slightly different to the lights - 1) temp 4 C instead of -1.5 C (no big deal) 2) camera at different angle to telescope (can't correct dust motes) 3) new camera angle adjuster in path (different vignetting and internal reflections) so I didn't hold out much hope that it would correct the problem. But it did! I used the new bias and darks to correct the new flats, and then the old bias and old darks and new flats to correct the lights. I'm so pleased I've finally figured out what was going on as it's ruined many images for me over the past year+. Thanks again Carole, Barry
  5. Hi guys, this is my effort on the Iris Nebula with a Tak FS-128 from a dark sky site in Ireland. I was being greedy, doing multiple targets on the same night (March 17th) so I only captured 2 hours on this one. Takahashi FS-128 with 0.75X reducer/flattener on Vixen AXD2 mount 60 X 120s with Nikon D750 Processing in PixInsight and Photoshop There's something funny going on with the rings in the background, which I have not been able to get rid of. This was from a truly dark site (Bortle 2) and the subs don't show any sign of these rigns, just the usual vignetting. I think the calibration is actually introducing the effect. I took flats and all that jazz, and did all the calibration in PI so I don't know what I'm doing wrong. Has anyone seen this kind of thing before? Comments and suggestions welcome! Barry
  6. Date: 17th March 2018 Location: Ballycroy international dark sky site in Co. Mayo, Ireland Telescope: Takahashi FS-128 with 0.75 reducer flattener Camera: Nikon D750 Mount: Vixen AXD2 Just 20 x 120s subs for 40 mins integration (far too little!). Same circumstances as the previous images I've posted lately - severely underexposed flats ruined images. Helped by this forum to realise problem. New flats with slightly different setup miraculously fixed problem. Comments and criticisms welcome, and thanks for looking. Barry Okay, I promise I'll stop spamming images now!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.