Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_christmas_presents.thumb.jpg.587637e0d01baf4b6d21b73610610bbb.jpg

moise212

Iris nebula with Skywatcher 72ED

Recommended Posts

Hello all!

The weekend that just passed we went to my girlfriend's parents. The skies in that rural area are pretty much as good as you can get. I don't have an SQM reader, but Clear Outside estimates 21.91.

I didn't take the EQ6R with me, I still consider it a big lump of iron, and the AZ-EQ5 should be on its way back this week as a Stellar mount. So I used the EQ5 which was left in the car for a while. While the tracking/guiding on the RA axis is quite good, the DEC control jumps a lot after multiple consecutive guiding commands, I blame the "enhanced" handset.

So with all the drawbacks, I tried to do align the mount as good as I could and I put the 72ED with the ASI1600 on it and a finder-guider.

Perhaps also focus could have been done a bit better, FWHM in the subs was 3.x.

Below is a quick process from last night, no deconvolution yet and a purple area at the bottom that I have to fix. 58x120s lum, 30x120s each RGB.

NGC7023-F357-2018-10-06-LRGB_p02.jpg

 

Last version:

NGC7023-F357-2018-10-06-LRGB_p02_watermark.thumb.jpg.b386d56c25f4e024ab0fefd15926aac4.jpg

Edited by moise212
  • Like 40

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's brilliant already. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I have to say, that looks pretty darn good to me. Without being able to pixel peep on my current device, your processing looks really good. Good color without looking overprocessed, very natural.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, both!

I didn't mention, but the image was rescaled to 60%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice image there, nice to see those stars in the corner looking round.

Looks like Skywatcher might have another winner on their hands regardless of some fiddling with spacing.

Edited by Skyline

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks terrific--it looks like I can reach out and run my hand through teh dust.  Well done

Rodd

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you too!

I thought/wanted to reprocess this, but I have tons of other data waiting in the queue. It's been clear here almost every night for the last 2 months maybe. Processing time now it is as the clouds rolled in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic, you really can see the dust just sitting in front of the stars.  Lucky you having too many clear nights :D :D :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

Fantastic, you really can see the dust just sitting in front of the stars.  Lucky you having too many clear nights :D :D :D

Thanks! I only skipped the ones when the moon was near full. Imaging, sleep, pack some gear, sleep, work and again.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a super Iris...... the dust is really good, you've processed it really well 👍🏻👍🏻

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, swag72 said:

That's a super Iris...... the dust is really good, you've processed it really well 👍🏻👍🏻

Thank you, Sara! Actually this was so easy to process, but I "blame" the good skies for this. It makes such a big difference to have good data to start with. That weekend we arrived home at 1-2 AM after a wedding. I had the stacks already, I registered the channels, I applied some DBE on the L and the RGB images, I extracted a synthetic luminance from RGB, I combined it with the real luminance, I took the highlights from the synthetic luminance (I think the stars were just a tad tighter), made an LRGB, TGV, MMT, stretch, slight star reduction, background enhance, increased the saturation on the highlights and at 3 AM I was sleeping already.

I should have applied some deconvolution and some sharpening, plus a better gradient handling as there's an annoying blue area at the bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Lovely image - Did you use the 0.8X Reducer with this?  I’m toying with either this or the WO ZS61.  This is faster with the reducer but obviously not FPL53 glass.  From your image though the stars colour looks bang on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks!

I haven't had yet the time and drive to process this properly. It's still on the process queue, but with a lower priority.

I used the dedicated reducer which is actually a reducer for the 80ED with an adapter. You need to increase the distance between the reducer and the sensor to about 60-62mm in order to get round stars towards the corners. More distance and you end up not reaching focus anymore.

I measured the focal distance with the 0.85x reducer/flattener and a backfocus distance of ~60mm and it turned out to be ~375mm. With a non reducing flattener I got ~430mm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm.... thanks for the info, sounds a bit of a pest to get the spacing correct

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! That's brilliant.

Where I live, I can't get close to that with even 10+ hours of lrgb.

I'm going to concentrate on NB from now on....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, blinky said:

Hmmm.... thanks for the info, sounds a bit of a pest to get the spacing correct

Around 60mm is not perfect, but quite fine.

13 hours ago, Pompey Monkey said:

Wow! That's brilliant.

Where I live, I can't get close to that with even 10+ hours of lrgb.

I'm going to concentrate on NB from now on....

 

Thank you! I can't get such results where I live either, but at a dark site... quite impressed too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 11/12/2018 at 18:13, Vixen4eva said:

Very nice indeed...

Clear skies

Thank you and clear skies!

 

I reprocessed the Iris, I hope I can call this one the last version.

On astrobin: https://www.astrobin.com/382251/

NGC7023-F357-2018-10-06-LRGB_p02_watermark.thumb.jpg.b386d56c25f4e024ab0fefd15926aac4.jpg

Edited by moise212
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding! Captivating target, really well presented. Thank you for sharing 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really very nice. I remember imaging this with an ED120 years ago, it takes me back looking at yours. 

You've got that wonderful deep 3D effect going on with all that dust. Lovely!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all very much!

18 hours ago, Lockie said:

I remember imaging this with an ED120 years ago, it takes me back looking at yours. 

One day... I will have an 120ED too, perhaps with a full frame DSLR on it when traveling light.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very lovely Iris Alex that's not over processed in seeking out the dust and you have the faintest of pink blushes in the reflection nebula too (to my eyes anyway). Congratulations 👍.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By DonJbari
      Hi all, 
      So, i've just begun my journey into Astronomy and subsequently have fallen into the rabbit hole of Astrophotography, as stated in the title i currently own a SkyWatcher Skyliner 200P FlexTube SynScan Dobsonian Telescope however as you may all know the dobsonian mount isn't really feasible for long exposure photographs and have started researching EQ Mounts and will most likely go with the Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro GOTO Mount & Tripod however i have seen comments about not being able to convert the FlexTube models of telescopes and was wondering if anyone here has had any success converting a SW flextube telescope to work on a EQ mount using tube rings?
      Thanks!
       

    • By Kronos831
      Heyaaaa. Its been a long time!(not really its been 5 days :P) its me againn ! As you have seen by the title i am in a delleema (misspells ftw) between eyepieces
      Here are 2 eyepieces i can buy with my budget
      https://www.amazon.co.uk/Prettyia-Eyepiece-Telescope-Skywatcher-Astronomy-Multicolor/dp/B012JC3274/ref=sr_1_9?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1547060539&sr=1-9&keywords=prettyia+eyepiece (ik its 3 eyepieces but there is no other pack that delivers to my location than only includes one)
      and https://www.firstlightoptics.com/skywatcher-eyepieces/skywatcher-uwa-planetary-eyepieces.html
      But with that excact same money i can buy this! 
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/skywatcher-eyepieces/sky-watcher-sky-panorama-eyepieces.html
      holy moly 82 degrees!
      Something is telling me to ditch the cheap Zoom eyepiece and the planetarys and  just buy the panorama eyepiece from the money i would use on the planetarys and the 8-24 instead.
      Does anyone have any expirience with that particular price range zoom eyepieces or the planetary or the panoramas?
      Also can you reccomend me a size (7mm 15mm)?(there is no way i m buying the 22mm one) my main targets will be dsos as well as planets so. I will be using those in my Celestron firstscope and in my future ( i ll buy it in like 3 months lol Skywatcher heritage 130p)
      telescopes: Focal lenghts :Current telescope:Celestron firstscope 300mm FL
      Future telescope:Skywatcher heritage 130p 650mm FL 
      To sum up:Get the 2 or the panorama?
      If i get the panorama which lenght?(7mm or 15mm)? (i want a size that compliments planets and most dsos ) ( i live in the southern hemisphere {so no orion nebula for me} (my favourite DSO)   for now atleast) 
      Thanks for your time !
      Kronos!
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys! Its me again... I know what you are thinking 😛 there is not such thing as a cheap mount for astrophotography...and i agree with you! I just want to know if there are any significantly cheap mounts (under 100 pounds)  for my skywatcher heritage 130p that can give me maybe 15-30 sec exposure time max. Thanks
      Kronos
    • By Kronos831
      So guys after lots of advice reaserching and reading for the last 2 months i ve decided that i m going to either get a Skywatcher 200P(DOB) or a Skywatcher Heritage 130p(DOB) 
      If i get the Dobsonian i ll be using it about once or twice a week (if i have clear skies that is) i ll be taking a taxi to a semi dark sky location(atleast darker than my light polluted neighborhood) about 1.5 km away  so the transportation cost will be close to nothing.I ve heard lots of great reviews about this neat 8" telescope and am tempted to buy it !(its going to be for visual i am aware of the earth's rotation)
      On the other hand the Smaller more portable Version the Heritage 130p is a very neat telescope for its price(i ve heard) Its half the price of the 200p! I ll be taking this out almost every time i get out of the house(for walks or meetings with friends etc) I ve read part of the thread in cloudy nights and it seems like a great telescope! I ve even seen some very nice  pictures with it (i know u need a mount). So what do you think guys? Should i go for the 200p or 130 p? I need the best value for money!
    • By Grumman
      Hello all,
       
      I just wanted to share something that I recently found out and it has worked for me like a treat!
      I have a Sky-Watcher 72ED and the Field Flattener for it. I had to purchase a "special" adapter ring for my DSLR which is actually a Canon Bayonet adapter but instead of a standard T2 threads, it comes with M48 (2") threads so it will fit to the Field Flattener's M48 thread.
      I have a fully screwed imaging train which makes it challenging for framing objects properly.
      I was thinking of having a manual rotator in the setup so I can rotate the camera and properly frame my targets but, the issue with this scope/field flattener combination is that it does not give you enough focuser travel. By adding a rotator in the solution it would add around 10mm of back-focus meaning that i could never be able to achieve focus with the current setup.
       
      I looked closer at my ring adapter that i purchased from FLO and it seems that it has 3 (M2.5) grub screws that seem to be holding something...
      I took a screw driver and to my surprise, the grub screws are holding what seems to be a rotation ring!
      I have bought some M2.5 thumb screws and presto! - I have a manual rotator built in on the ring adapter and it only costed me £3 for a set of 4 thumb screws from eBay!
       
      I hope this post helps someone else who is looking for a manual rotator but they can't afford one (as they cost around £60) or they do not have enough focus travel with their setup.
      Sky-Watcher DSLR-M48 Ring Adapter
      M2.5 Thumb Screws (pack of 4)
       

       
      Regards,
      Thanasis
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.