Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

NGC891


alan4908

Recommended Posts

This is an LRGB image taken with my Esprit 150, it has a total integration time of just below 12 hours. The galaxy is surrounded by quite bright yellow/red stars, in an attempt to control these I decided to process the star-field separately from the main galaxy.

I quite like the details and colours of the main galaxy and I was pleased to capture a little detail in the small background galaxies.

Alan

5a563e961c1d7_25.Finalpng.thumb.png.653b018be95b5318b8e49864ce77a0cd.png

 

LIGHTS: L:21, R:17, G: 15, B: 17 x 600s. BIAS:100, DARKS:30, FLATS:40 all at -20C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, SimonS said:

Very nice image :) 

Thanks Simon.

53 minutes ago, Tom OD said:

very nice detail in the galaxy.

Some of the stars look elongated though. You can fix this using the offset, and dark blends in PS

Tom.

Thanks for the comment Tom. :happy11: 

On the stars front - can you point out the stars which look elongated, since they all look round to me. Anyway, I checked with CCDInspector on both the final image and the LRGB stacks and they indicate very low aspect ratios (eg < 10).  So I'm a bit puzzled.

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, alan4908 said:

Thanks Simon.

Thanks for the comment Tom. :happy11: 

On the stars front - can you point out the stars which look elongated, since they all look round to me. Anyway, I checked with CCDInspector on both the final image and the LRGB stacks and they indicate very low aspect ratios (eg < 10).  So I'm a bit puzzled.

Alan

Hi Alan,

Most of them look elongated from the 11pm to 5pm direction. More of a teardrop look really. Easy to fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

I like the galaxy very much. I do see the elongation though. Its roughly aligned with the galaxy though slightly more vertical.

Ollu

Thanks Olly - unfortunately, I still cannot see that any of the stars are non round......:help: 

 

33 minutes ago, Tom OD said:

Hi Alan,

Most of them look elongated from the 11pm to 5pm direction. More of a teardrop look really. Easy to fix.

Thanks Tom, but unfortunately, I still cannot see it.

Anyway, I've taken a crop of the image, selected a few stars in MaximDL and they all are coming out OK. I've selected a random star (see below) which Maxim is telling me has a flatness of about 7%. To me this looks round - if I measure it on other stars they also appear round, so I'm really confused. 

Can you help by picking a star that you believe is a non round star ?

Alan

 

5a5665689fa96_maximdlroundnesscheck.thumb.jpg.2d250befd576a3ab22a90e22fef44d91.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gosh. You chaps are harsh critics. ?

I was busy being blown away with the amount of detail that you pulled out of that galaxy. The star field is a smidge on the colourful side for my taste. But that galaxy is outstanding!!

Great work!

Paul

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paul73 said:

Gosh. You chaps are harsh critics. ?

I was busy being blown away with the amount of detail that you pulled out of that galaxy. The star field is a smidge on the colourful side for my taste. But that galaxy is outstanding!!

Great work!

Paul

Thanks for the comment Paul. I was also pleased with the amount of detail in the galaxy.:happy11:

On the star front - I really don't mind criticism, unfortunately, when I can neither see the star elongation or detect it with two different programs I do find it confusing :hello:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, alan4908 said:

Thanks Olly - unfortunately, I still cannot see that any of the stars are non round......:help: 

 

Thanks Tom, but unfortunately, I still cannot see it.

Anyway, I've taken a crop of the image, selected a few stars in MaximDL and they all are coming out OK. I've selected a random star (see below) which Maxim is telling me has a flatness of about 7%. To me this looks round - if I measure it on other stars they also appear round, so I'm really confused. 

Can you help by picking a star that you believe is a non round star ?

Alan

 

5a5665689fa96_maximdlroundnesscheck.thumb.jpg.2d250befd576a3ab22a90e22fef44d91.jpg

 

 

Hi Alan,

This is interesting. I' m looking at your image, on my phone, and then on a lower res screen at work. My laptop screen at home and my phone show the elongation, but the screen here at work does not really.

I wonder is this a screen resolution issue then. My phone is good, and my laptop screen at home is very good.

The star you have in Blue in the above screen shot is rectangular on the laptop, but squarer on this lower res screen.

I hope this clears up any confusion. I dont like criticising images as its so difficult to create one, I ony pointed it out as its fixable and would make a great image, even better.

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious effect, stars definitely look elongated 5/11 on my screen but the more you zoom in on them the rounder they look, at pixel level they look OK :icon_scratch:

Super rendition of the galaxy Alan makes mine look pants :D

Dave

Stars at 1200%

5a5754a3e9e8c_NGC8911200.thumb.PNG.f5d052b4d1a5ae0f76aae5519b9d5ee6.PNG

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tom OD said:

Hi Alan,

This is interesting. I' m looking at your image, on my phone, and then on a lower res screen at work. My laptop screen at home and my phone show the elongation, but the screen here at work does not really.

I wonder is this a screen resolution issue then. My phone is good, and my laptop screen at home is very good.

The star you have in Blue in the above screen shot is rectangular on the laptop, but squarer on this lower res screen.

I hope this clears up any confusion. I dont like criticising images as its so difficult to create one, I ony pointed it out as its fixable and would make a great image, even better.

Tom.

Tom

Hmm yes, I agree that is interesting.

I think I shall have a look at image on various PC's to see if I can see anything. 

By the way, please don't hold back criticizing my images in the future, I view it as an excellent feedback to improve !

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Davey-T said:

Curious effect, stars definitely look elongated 5/11 on my screen but the more you zoom in on them the rounder they look, at pixel level they look OK :icon_scratch:

Super rendition of the galaxy Alan makes mine look pants :D

Dave

Hi Dave 

Thanks for this - this does seem very bizarre.

What screen resolution you are viewing the image at ?

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, alan4908 said:

Tom

Hmm yes, I agree that is interesting.

I think I shall have a look at image on various PC's to see if I can see anything. 

By the way, please don't hold back criticizing my images in the future, I view it as an excellent feedback to improve !

Alan

set the screen res to its highest setting too to see if its noticable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tom OD said:

i m 1920x1080 at home. only 1024x768 here at work

 

21 minutes ago, Davey-T said:

1920x1080 15" here, as Tom said you could mess with it in PS but may make it look worse when enlarged, worth experimenting though, nothing ventured nothing cocked up as they say :D

Thanks for the information. My screen resolution is 2560 x 1080, I changed it to 1920 x 1080 but I still cannot see any star elongation. I then went around various PC's of various screen resolutions but still nothing was revealed.

I then thought perhaps it's my eyesight, so to hopefully eliminate this aspect, I took a magnifying glass and started peering at the screen :happy11:

Unfortunately, I still cannot see anything odd. :icescream:

What I really don't understand, is related to the point made by Dave - how is it possible to see the elongation when zoomed out but not when zoomed in ?  I've also found star elongation, more easy to see when zoomed in.  

Anyway, all very interesting, although I am puzzled. 

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, alan4908 said:

Thanks Olly - unfortunately, I still cannot see that any of the stars are non round......:help: 

 

Thanks Tom, but unfortunately, I still cannot see it.

Anyway, I've taken a crop of the image, selected a few stars in MaximDL and they all are coming out OK. I've selected a random star (see below) which Maxim is telling me has a flatness of about 7%. To me this looks round - if I measure it on other stars they also appear round, so I'm really confused. 

Can you help by picking a star that you believe is a non round star ?

Alan

 

5a5665689fa96_maximdlroundnesscheck.thumb.jpg.2d250befd576a3ab22a90e22fef44d91.jpg

 

 

This is weird, isn't it. The star you've ringed here looks, on my screen, very obviously elongated top to bottom.  That is until I zoom right in on it as Dave suggested and, when pixelated it looks very much better. I'm mystified by this and have never come across it before. Could you post a link to one star - say that one - as a tiny square crop in TIFF or FITS. Just the star and a bit of space around it?

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe there is some compression of the data when its attached in this forum. As Olly says, check out the original FIT or TIFF and enlarged, and normal, they should look the same.

We'll figure this out I m sure.

T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davey-T said:

Perhaps it's my eyesight Alan, maybe I need new specs, do you wear glasses ?

Perhaps it's some sort of PNG conversion artefact that only shows up on some screens ?

Dave

Dave

No, I don't wear glasses (hence my use of a magnifying glass to hopefully eliminate this aspect !). 

Personally, to solve the problem, I think we need to eliminate the human and screen resolution effects and just try to measure something with a software program.

7 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

This is weird, isn't it. The star you've ringed here looks, on my screen, very obviously elongated top to bottom.  That is until I zoom right in on it as Dave suggested and, when pixelated it looks very much better. I'm mystified by this and have never come across it before. Could you post a link to one star - say that one - as a tiny square crop in TIFF or FITS. Just the star and a bit of space around it?

Olly

Hi Olly - yes, on the wierness scale I think this is pretty bizarre !

Here, is a TIFF crop of the star that I pointed MaximDL at:

Star crop.tif

Hope this works since I never attempted to upload a TIFF before.

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that star looks good on my work screen, but a bit rectangular on my phone. What adds to the effect, is that the halo on the star is rectangular, and has a smoother transition to the core of the star. So maybe thats what my eye is picking up, making it look overall that shape.

Again though definite differenecs between the phone and monitor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Olly, Tom and Dave

Since I have a suspicion it has something to do with the way I've processed this, I thought it would be useful to do some measurements at the early stages on the same star.

So, firstly, an unprocessed and unstretched RGB TIFF image in MaximDL (showing the star roundness at about 4%) 

5a577b7e63e83_MaximDLRGB.thumb.jpg.6271b1f48129f211fcfe1f85dadde123.jpg

A crop of the unprocessed and unstretched RGB TIFF image (this is the same star as the crop of the fully processed result)

RGB unprocessed star crop.tif

 

MaximDL screenshot measurement - still unstretched but after applying DBE, Photometric Colour calibration and SNCR Green (showing star roundness at about 7%)

5a577c6437398_MaximDLRGBDBEPhotoCCSNCRgreen.thumb.jpg.68c6b02119a68b706cbf0830af1120b5.jpg

 

Alan

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.