Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Using a Nikon D5300


Recommended Posts

I have just started using my Nikon D5300 for Astrophotography. I have been wondering what to do with the settings for:

1 High ISO Noise Reduction,

2 Long Exposure Noise Reduction

3 Active D Lighting

At the moment I set these to 'Off' because I thought they might interfere with the RAW data collected. These settings are found on many Nikon models and I guess other brands have similar modes.

What do you think ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Canon camera has similar features to those listed, the only one I find useful is the long exp noise reduction which is very handy when taking single shots of something like the Milky Way with some forground interest in all other applications stacking and seperate darks do a better job.

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ISO between 400 and 800 , too high and you just add more noise.

Long-exp NR off , else you'll end up wasting half your imaging time , after every exposure the camera will automatically take another of the same length but with the mirror down creating its own 'dark frame' ... if you're snapping with short exposures it makes little odds , but if you're shooting 5 minute exposures instead of getting 12 frames of data per hour you only get 6 effectively.

Active D Lighting I have no idea , but I doubt it brings much to the party as far as Astrophotography is concerned ...  :smiley:

Will have a 'Google' on this ...  :rolleyes:

Ok , Active D Lighting is just an inbuilt automatic adjustment that wants to be left off ...  :smiley:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just started using my Nikon D5300 for Astrophotography. I have been wondering what to do with the settings for: 1 High ISO Noise Reduction, 2 Long Exposure Noise Reduction 3 Active D Lighting At the moment I set these to 'Off' because I thought they might interfere with the RAW data collected. These settings are found on many Nikon models and I guess other brands have similar modes. What do you think ?

The majority of the imagers using DSLR will have all those settings disabled. The so called " RAW " data is not really RAW as a lot of manipulation of data is carried out inside the camera using the ever more powerful processors but you do not want to make matters worst by applying daytime photography NR algorithms to AP data. The only real raw comes from cooled CCDs.

A.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between exposures of any length you also need to allow the sensor to cool otherwise the thermal noise goes up.

Usually advised to allow the chip to cool by an equal amount to the exposure, so in effect it is 60 sec exposure, 60 second wait to cool, next 60 sec exposure.

Concerning NR it is difficult, normal daytime exposures are 1/250 sec, not 20 exposures of 60 seconds each.

If it were of no use I doubt that Nikon, Canon, Sony etc would have the feature.

The one thing to remember is that you are doing something very, very different to daytime photography.

Easy answer is try the different options and see what if any difference is apparent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between exposures of any length you also need to allow the sensor to cool otherwise the thermal noise goes up.

Usually advised to allow the chip to cool by an equal amount to the exposure, so in effect it is 60 sec exposure, 60 second wait to cool, next 60 sec exposure.

I suspect that's bad advice in most cases, that's throwing away half your precious imaging time to get the sensor temp down a little. Personally I only give the camera 10-15 seconds between subs. It would be very difficult to determine the optimum cooldown time as it depends on so many factors. It's all about signal-to-noise ratio at the end of the day. When going after the faintest targets it might be critical to knock as much noise out of the subs as possible. However, on many DSOs simply stacking a number of subs is sufficient to knock out the noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually my old Nikon D80 had terrible amp glow issues, not sure how the D5300 is.  My new Canon 1100d is muchhh better on that score.

I'd agree turn both noise reductions off.  For the LENR you're better off taking lots of darks and stacking those, that way the noise in your darks gets averaged out before you apply to the lights.  Dithering and stacking should average out High ISO noise too, better than having it done programmatically in-camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between exposures of any length you also need to allow the sensor to cool otherwise the thermal noise goes up.

Usually advised to allow the chip to cool by an equal amount to the exposure, so in effect it is 60 sec exposure, 60 second wait to cool, next 60 sec exposure.

Concerning NR it is difficult, normal daytime exposures are 1/250 sec, not 20 exposures of 60 seconds each.

If it were of no use I doubt that Nikon, Canon, Sony etc would have the feature.

The one thing to remember is that you are doing something very, very different to daytime photography.

Easy answer is try the different options and see what if any difference is apparent.

I suspect that's bad advice in most cases, that's throwing away half your precious imaging time to get the sensor temp down a little. Personally I only give the camera 10-15 seconds between subs. It would be very difficult to determine the optimum cooldown time as it depends on so many factors. It's all about signal-to-noise ratio at the end of the day. When going after the faintest targets it might be critical to knock as much noise out of the subs as possible. However, on many DSOs simply stacking a number of subs is sufficient to knock out the noise.

My solution to this when I go out with my Nikon D3200 is to do a "Warmup shot" of about 10 minutes before I start taking any serious shots.

Although... I have no idea if that's a good thing for the camera's longevity...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pipnina,I think my eyes were from the same supplier! I tried using a laser collimator but got a headache...

Yeah. Astigmatism Optics are notorious for giving bad views at the eyepiece. Collimation only works if you have a LASIK collimator and that doesn't even have a 100% sucess rate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.