Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

6 inch refractor: A sense of scale


John

Recommended Posts

I just thought I'd post a couple of snaps of my Istar 6" F/12 refractor in case anyone is considering such a beast scope  :smiley:

Sorry about my somewhat glazed expression in the 1st pic but I'd just scurried across the room and hefted a 34 lb 6 1/2 foot tube onto my lap in the 10 secs that my self timer gives me so I forgot to smile :rolleyes2:

The 2nd pic shows my 102mm F/6.5 Vixen and 120mm F/7.5 Skywatcher ED refractors for comparison.

These big, long refractors are a somewhat crazy obsession :rolleyes2:  :grin:

post-118-0-63733100-1379495986_thumb.jpg

post-118-0-58096600-1379495995_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's longer than the sofa!

Out of curiosity, how high off the ground is the eyepiece at when the scope is pointed at the zenith?

On the Skytee II with the CG5 tripod and the 16" pillar extension, the eyepiece is just over a metre off the ground when viewing the zenith area. I ought to stress though that this is not the final mounting solution for this scope - I was just using it to do some initial star testing. 

I'm not claiming that scopes like these make any sense at all really - there are much more practical ways to get 6" of aperture. 

But it's a hobby so why not try something different ? :grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW

Mmmm. Okay. That's a huuuuge scope.  :)

Pics like these are far superior to stock scope on mount pics. Gives a true sense of the size of a 6" F12.

Clear skies !!

Andy.

Thanks Andy. The engineering on these scopes is something else too - similar to Intes in quality / robustness / finish, if you know what I mean :smiley: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given it's, ahem, portability, is it for an observatory?

It probably should be in an observatory (and me in an asylum !) but I don't have that facility at the current time so I'm looking to put together a mounting solution that gets around that. I'm not in a hurry with this one (just as well !) so I may get something fabricated for it - a massive Victorian style fork mount maybe ?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does look a bit dangerous :-)

A small backyard observatory may be mistaken as a small tank... Better warn the neighbors!

Luckily my neighbours are used to large tube-like objects in my back yard Markus   :smiley:

If I get it out to the open fields though I might have some explaining to do - we have a major Police HQ nearby and they may feel under threat  :shocked:

I'll have to get a license for it ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you find the scope in use as I was considering the very same as my next to add to the collection . It would look lovelly on my all black eq6((dreaming again sorry) with orange bits!!!!

It's early days and I've only been able to do some star testing, looked at some tight doubles and had a peek at the moon but it's all looking very promising. CA levels are really quite low and the intra and extra focal star images look tidy and consistent.

An EQ6 is one option I'm considering but I'd need to upgrade the tripod to something large and wooden I think - something like a Berlebach Uni 28 or perhaps a Tele Opic GD-1. Or maybe make my own .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's early days and I've only been able to do some star testing, looked at some tight doubles and had a peek at the moon but it's all looking very promising. CA levels are really quite low and the intra and extra focal star images look tidy and consistent.

An EQ6 is one option I'm considering but I'd need to upgrade the tripod to something large and wooden I think - something like a Berlebach Uni 28 or perhaps a Tele Opic GD-1. Or maybe make my own .....

John, how about the CGE-Pro tripod, or even the Skywatcher EQ8 tripod? They'll certainly be heavy-duty enough :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, how about the CGE-Pro tripod, or even the Skywatcher EQ8 tripod? They'll certainly be heavy-duty enough :).

I guess they would. I'm hoping not to have to spend that much though and, ideally, I'd prefer an alt-az solution. The APM Maxload alt-az would do the job on a massive wooden tripod but I'd need to budget around £1.5K I guess. The Skytee II actually holds the weight of the scope surprisingly well but the 2" steel tubed CG5 tripod allows too much twisting movement from the long tube. 

I knew mounting this would not be a straightforward exercise and it's certainly not but I wanted a challenge and I think it can be solved without having to spend £thousands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess they would. I'm hoping not to have to spend that much though and, ideally, I'd prefer an alt-az solution. The APM Maxload alt-az would do the job on a massive wooden tripod but I'd need to budget around £1.5K I guess. The Skytee II actually holds the weight of the scope surprisingly well but the 2" steel tubed CG5 tripod allows too much twisting movement from the long tube. 

I knew mounting this would not be a straightforward exercise and it's certainly not but I wanted a challenge and I think it can be solved without having to spend £thousands.

You're probably right, wood would be a nice stable option provided you made the tripod legs thick enough :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.