Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Moonshane

Moderators
  • Content Count

    22,356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Moonshane last won the day on January 25 2019

Moonshane had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

12,133 Excellent

About Moonshane

  • Rank
    "I had no need of that hypothesis" Laplace

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Manchester
  1. I sometimes find the position more comfortable with a frac if I look 'side on' rather than from the back. The angle of the object can be a bit odd of course but the detail is the same. I prefer sitting too.
  2. I split this regularly with my 80mm frac but at 150x. Don't forget to check Vega while in the area. I'll try next time out to see how low I can go with my 120mm Equinox.
  3. Just saw this mate. Ouch. Although I did think it looked like it would be ok with a new end ring. All looking great to me
  4. I could not stand being under a cover so made these
  5. Oh dear. Can't we even insult inanimate objects now? Truly it seems the end of any sort of deprecating humour is nigh.
  6. Bear in mind you will need a correct image diagonal (prism) for terrestrial use or your image will be left right reversed. Maybe this is not an issue though for stated use.
  7. You may be right Craig but it's the OOUK one and it usually has a 2" extension on it which I can remove. I can just reach focus with binos and a 1.7x GPC.My 12" and 16" are the same. I'll be doing a bit of trial and error.
  8. Totally off topic but I just noticed your avatar and loved Blakes 7 when I was a kid. In fact I was at an event in Manchester for the opening of a sci-fi themed night club called Fab Cafe http://www.fabcafe.co.uk/ and Gareth Thomas was there as the VIP.
  9. This is excellent info - thank you!
  10. Just had a read and for my f11 6" Newt, I hope I might just get away with no barlow for visual. I'll try it and see what the view is like. The issue with a barlow would be that assuming 4x amplification, it would mean a 6.4m focal length LOL. This would make my 27mm Panoptic a high power planetary eyepiece at 237x. That said I am more likely I think to use my 120mm Equinox. Over the next week I am hoping to actually put the thing into play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.