Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Fact of the day..


mdstuart

Recommended Posts

I found out that our sun is pretty weak compared to those in the sky we look at with the Naked eye.

As I understand it..if you take our sun 50 light years away you would not be able to see it...

So Pleides the cluster is 400 light years. At that distance our sun would be WELL below visibility so the stars in Pleides are FAR brighter than the sun..

I think eta cassiopea os like our sun but is 20 light years away but other than that there are not many other brightish G main sequence stars you can see..

Mark

So tommorrow someone else please come up with a fact of the day that is not well known...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way to compare its real brightness is to use its absolute magnitude, i.e the magnitude at a distance of 10 parsecs (32.6 light years)

At that distance the sun would be just mag. +4.8. By comparison, Rigel would be mag -8, Deneb -7.2 and Betelgeuse -5.6. Sirius would be mag +1.4. Proxima Centauri would be just +15.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When trying to explain to some of the general public the size of the Sun, which to them looks the same as the Moon, I find it helpfull to say that if the Earth was placed at the centre of the Sun, the Moon's orbit would be 200,000 miles below the surface!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also useful to tell them that you could line up 110 earths along the diameter of the sun's disk. If you're projecting the sun or using a solar scope then you can use the sun-spots as comparison. Often these are larger than earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Rigel was at the same distance as Alpha Centauri it would be as bright as the moon.

And, of course, if Betelgeuse was also as close as Alpha Centauri, we would be toast sometime in the next million years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When trying to explain to some of the general public the size of the Sun, which to them looks the same as the Moon, I find it helpfull to say that if the Earth was placed at the centre of the Sun, the Moon's orbit would be 200,000 miles below the surface!
Talking about the size of the Sun and the Moon, here's a little test which anyone can check out for themselves, although the answer will catch some people out!

Which of the following objects, when held out at arm's length, will just about cover the Moon and no more?

1. A pea.

2. A hazelnut.

3. A walnut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be a pea.
Of course. I don't suppose many experienced stargazers would be stumped, but apparently there's a widespread belief amongst 'lay' observers that the Moon is a lot bigger than it really is.

I recall, there was a TV programme many years ago, in which Patrick Moore was standing on a beach with a bunch of teenagers, and asked each of them, without looking at the Moon first, to pick up a pebble that would fulfil the above test. He was the only one to choose a pebble of the right size. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats in a name, ever heard of : Lode Star, Alruccabah, Cynosur, Phoenice, Tramontana, Angel stern, Navagatoria, Star of Arcady, Yilduz, Mismar, Polyarnaya, Dhurva, to top it all it is a Cepheid variable. What is it ? its Polaris of course by other names, its a good job the rest of the stars don`t have as many names ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.