Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Using clocks for drives


Recommended Posts

You have to drive the scope weight, the counter balance weights, the mount casing and everything and there is friction involved.

So scope say 5kg, counter weights say 3kg, general mounts casing say 1kg. So 9kg at present, add in friction.

Agreed that they should be balanced, just they never are perfectly, however they still have to be moved so you have to get the whole mass up to speed, then maintain it

You will need a fairly big clock motor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clocks used to be used 100+ years ago. Or more correctly, clockwork drives were used.

There is absolutely no reason to use them today, electric motors are vastly superior.

Regards

Barry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sorts of clocks used to drive mounts were similar to "Church Tower" clocks - capable of holding a three foot long minute hand still on a windy day!! Modern electric clocks have (or use) virtually no power at all - although you could use a modern clock to be "master" of some other mechanism.

By the way - modern household clocks and watches are not particularly accurate - far less so than a reasonably good quality clockwork clock. I have made several clock movements (my other hobby) and all have been capable of better than one second per week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay... Thanks folks.. Back to the drawing board then! :icon_eek:

I had heard of the accuracy problem with small clocks. Which is why I use a clockwork, Half-Hunter, as my personal timepiece.

reminds me:

I was standing beneath the Chamberlain Clock in Hockley, Birmingham one day in 1965, when some old chap suddenly darted into the road and started traffic dodging. He came up to me and said, 'Excuse me. Can you tell me the time please!'

Honest!

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget that for tracking, your clock would need to run at i rev per day to be anything like a sidereal drive, they wouldn't have enough "grunt" to overcome the inertia of the mount and telescope. If my memory serves me correctly, I think that clock drives used to drive on the escapement principle where the fall of a weight, governed by the clock, provided the motive force.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was a perfect balance between the c/ws and the scope, shouldn't the friction be negligible? Or is this my inadequate knowledge of physics?

Even professional observatories have clock drive errors on the order of 0.1 arcsecond per second apparently. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have made an equatorial platform using a 12v DC 4 rpm motor controlled via a PWM controller and driving an M10 threaded rod. not very practical for a telescope mount on a tripod but just mentioned it as there's always more than one way to skin a cat. with the rod I am using and the arc or the mount based on my latitude etc, a turn of about 2rpm tracks at high magnification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sidereal day is about 4 minutes shorter than the mean solar, remember. Well balanced mounts don't need much power - I read that the motor driving the 200 inch Palomar is about the equivalent of a domestic hairdrier motor - but that is still more than my watch!

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke.

If you want a better alternative try using the stepper motor from a printer.

You can use the circuit board from the printer to drive it and control the whole thing from a computer using a USB lead.You will need to be able to control the revolutions of the motor but there are plenty of free stuff on the net.

I am using the same principle on my scope only I am using Nema 23 stepper motors for the axis drives and a printer stepper motor for the focus.

I drive the whole setup using the Mach 3 CNC milling programme.

Reason for the large stepper motors is I converted my small mill to CNC a couple of years back but I think the telescope is far more important than the mill.

If you want to go even further you can add a gearbox.

My new project is to build a new mount using my motors but to run them through a 3000 to 1 reduction gearbox.This way the motors can run to thier full power and smoothness and still track to a very fine tollerance.

Just a thought.

graham

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks folks..

It seems I started a thread then! :)

A happy development though. My daughter has offered me semi-permanent loan of her 3.75" refractor. (Well I did buy it for her in the first place!)

It doesn't have a drive, but daughter tells me the mounting is upgradeable and I could buy the proper accessory. Perhaps I will take up her offer for the easiest solution.

As the instrument obviously isn't mine, when I later return it, then being the generous type, I'll leave the motor fitted! :)

(IHmmmm! I am wondering about her motivation for offering me the loan...) ;)

Regards

Jon :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi there. I have an EQ3 mount and as light pollution makes observing at home difficult have to go well away from source of electricity to use scope.

I have also obtained a former street light timing clock.

Is there any way to adapt to drive the mount? Any websites to look at. Help please!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.