Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

chiltonstar

Members
  • Posts

    2,901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by chiltonstar

  1. Many thanks for the above very useful info and suggestions. Maybe I can persuade The Cat to buy me the TV 8mm for Xmas - after all I've just had to pay for her to visit the vet after she dined out on after sell-by date mouse! Chris
  2. There was a mini-review of these in October's AN, and although labelled as orthos, they seem to be symmetrical Plossls. Oddly, on the FLO website they come under Takahashi (really?). Anyone any idea of how well they perform? Why oh why isn't there a half decent 8mm ortho available? It is a good fl for my 180 Mak and although I have a BST 8mm, it is not up to ortho standards. Chris
  3. Very nice for the first image! As you say a very different type of skill required cpd with DSO imaging - getting the planet onto the camera chip can be quite a challenge sometimes! Chris
  4. Interesting topic! They do look quite different through a 4" and certainly through my 180 Mak. I had always put this down to the fact that the Airy disk is not "flat-topped" but a pseudo parabola (ie with a "point") and therefore resolution on some objects can be apparently slightly better than theory (one point Nik, shouldn't the Airy disk diameter and the apparent moon diameter be added as the SQRT of the sum of the squares rather than linearly?). Differences in brightness will change the apparent visual diameter as well I believe - look at how large a bright star appears to be cpd with eg a mag 8 star. Chris
  5. ...it would do a lot better if we had more nights with fine seeing! This is the entire 20 sequence above (I selected 6 for derotation) as an animated .gif. You can certainly see the minute by minute variation in seeing! Chris
  6. Superb report John. I don't know Dartmoor very well, but it certainly matches my experience of a couple of very dark spots in Cornwall we've stayed in. Such a shame that our children and grandchildren will never have this experience unless we do something serious about LP. Chris
  7. Jupiter last light with a little scope (180 Mak). Average seeing with some better spots. Image stacked in AS, then PS and derotated. Bloody tawny owl kept on making low passes and hooting. Chris
  8. Well, I've been an amateur astronomer for 50+ years, and the ghastly climate hasn't put me off yet! I used to keep an Excel spreadsheet of noteworthy astro happenings and I reckon rain/cloud stopped play on about 70% of occasions! Chris
  9. Nice images Neil. I was all set up for the Jupiter transition, and then a blanket of cloud appeared and wiped my southerly view. Ah well. Chris
  10. Greetings Claudio! I lived in Varese for 8 enjoyable years and developed my interest in astronomy there. Chris
  11. Worth looking at the Abingdon Astro Soc website - they (ie we) use a darkish site. The Ridgeway has some fairly dark spots as well. Chris
  12. Judging by what pupils look like when someone has taken certain drugs, maybe this can be induced with certain "substances", including legal ones such as caffeine and ethanol? Chris
  13. View with a 180 Mak. each is 2000/5000 frames. Part of a 50 minute sequence - cloud stopped play! Io is visible (correct orientation) just above and the the right of the shadow as a lighter spot. Nothing like the result from a C14 of course........ Chris
  14. Very nice! Good to see the C ring showing and Enke, with a reaalistic colour rendition overall. Chris
  15. In my 180 Mak, my 10mm Baader Ortho and a 9mm Circle T both perform very well indeed (to my non-expert eyes). While I like the FoV of the BSTs, (I have 8, 12 and 18mm) I do find the reflections I see of bright targets like Jupiter a bit distracting as they move across the field when you move your eye slightly. Chris
  16. Brilliant detail! I imaged J at the same time with my 180 Mak. The difference in resolution is very obvious. Chris
  17. Some good potential detail there Trevor! I struggle with an IR mono filter with my 180 Mak - I wonder if this is because although an IR filter reduces seeing issues, it of course reduces the resolution quite a bit (factor 1.5 roughly). This may be less of an issue with a larger aperture, but maybe is an issue with only 180mm. Views? Chris
  18. I've only ever seen the C ring twice with a large observatory cassegrain, but not with amateur scopes in recent years. Enke seems very difficult with my 180 Mak - I've had hints once or twice, when Saturn has been higher in the sky. It does show up in a stacked image though. Chris
  19. Not sure. With my set-up, I have the Barlow inside the nosepiece of the camera, which goes into the ADC which in turn goes into the flip mirror, which is in the back of the scope (1 1/4" adapter). With this, the levers are on the rhs. My usual setting is one 45 degrees up, one 45 degrees down. this removes the visual AD on Jupiter or Saturn when it is say 20 degrees up. If I move the levers to the central (zero) position, the AD is obvious, it disappears as I open the levers. Re colour balance, I think Vlav's adjustment above is about right - what I see through the EP. many images have had the colour saturation wound up which looks pretty, but it's overdone in my very humble opinion. The original looks greenish on both my monitor and my phone. Chris
  20. I've tried with and without with my Mak, and I see definite improvement even compared with rgb align in AS or Registax. Visually with an EP I would say I can see more detail in J's belts and certainly more ring detail with S. Improves the muddy appearance of S near the horizon too. Chris
  21. Good detail for 5" Neil. Ate you finding significant improvement with the ADC? Chris
  22. Nice images. I am afraid that poor weather may well wreck this year's Jupiter season! Chris
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.