Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

It's life Jim, but not as we know it... Jim being James Webb


Mr Spock

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Astronomist said:

Just saw this come up on MSN when i opened my browser, Interesting stuff! Not very useful in practise though, the planet is much too far away to ever go there.

Or, perhaps more importantly, for them to come here! 🤣

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case anyone was desperately wondering?!? (From a simple Google Search!) 😁

Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is the dominant volatile organic sulfur in global oceans.  The
predominant source of oceanic DMS is the cleavage of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP),
which can be produced by marine bacteria and phytoplankton.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25416398/
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that this was a prime candidate for study. Considering how quickly exoplanet detection ramped up you have to wonder if this sort of find is the first of many. Going to need that Habitable World Observatory sometime soon.

Edited by StarryEyed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is probably true that we should not expect our familiar biochemistry to crop up all over the universe, but then again maybe the RNA/DNA world was just the most succesful out of many different forms that populated the early Earth, and our microbial ancestors ate all the competition. By the time procaryotes appear in the fossil record, the Earth may have gone through several different forms of life with slightly different biochemical pathways, only for these to be wiped out by impacts during the Late Heavy Bombardment (or the equivalent) and each time life sprang up again and went through the same evolutionary process until only the most succesful solution to replication became dominant. I imagine that on most exoplanets minerals such as olivine, pyroxene, quartz and so on have the same crystallographic configuration as those on Earth, and even more complex hydrated minerals are the same there as here, as there are only limited ways to achieve a stable form with the atomic constituents available. If life also has a similarly narrow range of stable formats, and lets face it life is just another natural process and probably an inevitable one, then maybe the same or very similar biochemistry may be widespread - hence the significance of DMS, if the observations are shown to be correct. The down side of this would be that other worlds may also inevitably give rise to bipedal primates with an overwhelming sense of hubris through converent evolution.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First things first an overwhelming body of evidence of basic life. Which is not something Webb can provide. Obviously life on earth is an example of one for context. You have to apply the scientific method and tick that box first before you can explore the other possibilities. If we don't then NASA might as well have said yes aliens are hot rodding around our atmosphere for kicks. But regardless more exoplanets with bio markers please.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Barry Fitz-Gerald said:

Well spotted.......... but,

Hypothetical means based on possibilities and not reality - not quite the same.

Anything is possible, it's  "probable" that makes them flights of fantasy :) 

Jim 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.