Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

[Help] Moving up to a better mount!


raadoo

Recommended Posts

After many hours spent tweaking and playing around with my AZ-GTi for the past year or so, I'm ready to move up to a more long-term mount and plead the wisdom of this fine group for some considered recommendations.

Things I care about:

  • Equatorial GoTo
  • Imaging, guided for both DSOs and planetary
  • Portable, so low weight is paramount*
  • Minimum imaging payload of ~10kg**
  • Good track record of reliability, both hardware and software
  • I'll continue to be using my AAP for a while so software compatibility is important
  • < €2.5K

I've got a shortlist which looks like this:

  iOptron Vixen iOptron
  CEM40 / GEM45 SXD2 CEM26 / GEM28EC
Payload (sans cw) 18 15 12.7
Weight (head) 7.2 8.8 4.5
Price 2400 2600 2430
Comment Seems like the best option, on paper, at least. Portable enough with payload that'll last me a while and generally seems like I it's unlikely I'll get a lemon. Not the greatest payload to weight ratio, and the priciest of the bunch, but there's an assumed inherent quality, it coming from Vixen. In their EC variant, the 26/28 reach the same price as the 40/45 series. I'm going to guide anyway so wondering if that RA encoder is worth it? Lightest of the bunch, but also flimsiest from what I read.

But I'm very open to other options, so please do recommend!

* In an ideal world, I'd go for the RST-135 in a heartbeat. But it's near twice my budget so it's a non-starter, sadly.

** A C8 equivalent is the heaviest I'll ever put on it. Not because I don't want to go heavier, but because my bad back would have words with me if I would dare huck a chonker around.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote iOptron.

Do consider using better tripod like Berlebach instead of stock steel tripod for better stability, but check from portability point of view if it will suit you. I added Berlebach Planet to my HEQ5 and it made a huge difference.

Btw - you don't need guiding for planetary imaging.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

I vote iOptron.

Do consider using better tripod like Berlebach instead of stock steel tripod for better stability, but check from portability point of view if it will suit you. I added Berlebach Planet to my HEQ5 and it made a huge difference.

Btw - you don't need guiding for planetary imaging.

@vlaiv You're one of the people here whose experience with their iOptron swayed me towards the CEM40! 😃 

I've purposely only mentioned the head weight for each mount above as I've been well sold on Berlebachs ever since I got my Report - but am planning on using an Uni for the new mount.

I am aware that planetary doesn't need guiding - that would in fact be one of the worse things I could do for my lunar images! 😁

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do have GEM28EC as my second mount and with C8 Edge HD and OSC camera on , I can go unguided easily with 5min exposure at native 2m FL.  As you say , you will be guiding anyway, investment into encoders is not really justified.  I realized that this setup is a bit wind sensitive as it is very light all together.  BtW there are "plain" non-EC versions of 28 and 26 mounts available. 

In fact, "plain" GEM28 or CEM26 is a clear winner on portability-price - payload ratio. However if this is going to be your main mount , I suggest you seriously consider CEM40 or GEM45.

It would handle the weight easily, even if you add weight in the future, guiding with this load will be a piece of cake , and still very portable. 

Of course , Vixen is good , and whatever choice you make, it will not be wrong. 

Edited by Stefek
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done similar with my GTi, spending quality imaging time this year trying to get good results at longer focal lengths using my 60mm refractor. You should add the Rainbow Astro 135 models as other options at this capability point, admittedly with another step-up in cost mind🤑

PS, just read your notes🙃

Edited by fireballxl5
added PS
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, raadoo said:

After many hours spent tweaking and playing around with my AZ-GTi for the past year or so, I'm ready to move up to a more long-term mount and plead the wisdom of this fine group for some considered recommendations.

The question I would ask is whether you can wait and build up some funds if you want a 'long term' mount.  It will open up more (and better) options.   The only experience I have is with the original SXD (different software) but found it a wonderfully light weight portable mount.  There were some known software bugs originally but I never came across these.  However I understand the SXP2 is much superior to the SXD2 option these days.  You've already noted the RA-135E is out of budget but if you could wait 6/12 months would that become viable?  I always find the worst feeling is "if I'd only been a bit more patient" etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Whirlwind said:

The question I would ask is whether you can wait and build up some funds if you want a 'long term' mount.  It will open up more (and better) options.   The only experience I have is with the original SXD (different software) but found it a wonderfully light weight portable mount.  There were some known software bugs originally but I never came across these.  However I understand the SXP2 is much superior to the SXD2 option these days.  You've already noted the RA-135E is out of budget but if you could wait 6/12 months would that become viable?  I always find the worst feeling is "if I'd only been a bit more patient" etc.  

It's a fair point and one I've personally made to others in the past as well. We do need to define a few parameters before moving forward with this thread:

  • Long-term Mount: I'm thinking 3-5 years. Past that, I'd be looking at what I call a Forever Mount (e.g. 10Micron)
  • We can always extend the idea of if I'd only been a bit more patient more and more. And with it, budget. But a line must be drawn. So I'll extend that waiting to your proposed 6 months and up the budget to under €4k.

That being said, I have very little knowledge of that market or what's reliable / flaky, so any recommendations and ideas are very welcome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, raadoo said:

It's a fair point and one I've personally made to others in the past as well. We do need to define a few parameters before moving forward with this thread:

  • Long-term Mount: I'm thinking 3-5 years. Past that, I'd be looking at what I call a Forever Mount (e.g. 10Micron)
  • We can always extend the idea of if I'd only been a bit more patient more and more. And with it, budget. But a line must be drawn. So I'll extend that waiting to your proposed 6 months and up the budget to under €4k.

That being said, I have very little knowledge of that market or what's reliable / flaky, so any recommendations and ideas are very welcome!

It doesn't have to be and it really depends on what you want.  All I can go on is from my own experience.  I went from a CG5 - Vixen SXD - Mach1GTO.  In hindsight I would have probably been better to have gone straight to the Mach1GTO based on what I wanted to achieve at the time.  Nevertheless the SXD (although not planned) still provides a very useful 'holiday' mount as it is much more portable than the Mach1 (so I still have it).  The Mach1 is probably my forever, but not in an observatory mount.  When I get my own house in the countryside, in dark skies etc (I wish) then I will plan for an observatory mount....lol  Although if your current mount is on its last legs than you may be pushed into that earlier decision anyway (it really depends on why you want to upgrade).  But I do take the point that you can't wait forever otherwise you will never get anything!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Whirlwind said:

It doesn't have to be and it really depends on what you want.  All I can go on is from my own experience.  I went from a CG5 - Vixen SXD - Mach1GTO.  In hindsight I would have probably been better to have gone straight to the Mach1GTO based on what I wanted to achieve at the time.  Nevertheless the SXD (although not planned) still provides a very useful 'holiday' mount as it is much more portable than the Mach1 (so I still have it).  The Mach1 is probably my forever, but not in an observatory mount.  When I get my own house in the countryside, in dark skies etc (I wish) then I will plan for an observatory mount....lol  Although if your current mount is on its last legs than you may be pushed into that earlier decision anyway (it really depends on why you want to upgrade).  But I do take the point that you can't wait forever otherwise you will never get anything!

That's exactly the kind of experience I'm looking to learn from, thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on your list of requirements (which align pretty closely with mine), the Vixen. Although I'm oscillating between the SXD2 and SXP2 belt drive. 

I'm likely to buy one in the new year and for similar reasons. Portability, good QA/QC, reliability, good guided performance, and the Starbook 10 go-to seems like a great system. 

Portability is the big thing for me. I prefer to drive to dark sky sites

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 900SL said:

Based on your list of requirements (which align pretty closely with mine), the Vixen. Although I'm oscillating between the SXD2 and SXP2 belt drive. 

I'm likely to buy one in the new year and for similar reasons. Portability, good QA/QC, reliability, good guided performance, and the Starbook 10 go-to seems like a great system. 

Portability is the big thing for me. I prefer to drive to dark sky sites

 

I'm finding it quite difficult to consider the SXP2...

  Vixen Rainbow Astro
  SXP2 RST-135
Payload 17kg 18kg
Weight 11kg (head) + 3.7kg (cw) 3.3kg (head) + 3kg (cw)
Price € 4,300 € 4,500

  

Edited by raadoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, raadoo said:

I'm finding it quite difficult to consider the SXP2...

  Vixen Rainbow Astro
  SXP2 RST-135
Payload 17kg 18kg
Weight 11kg (head) + 3.7kg (cw) 3.3kg (head) + 3kg (cw)
Price € 4,300 € 4,500

  

Yes, the RST 135 has a lot going for it. The PE is pretty poor unguided though..

 

I'll likely stick with the SXD2 and get a decent scope with the €2K remainder.. :) 

Edited by 900SL
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, scotty38 said:

At that price wouldn’t you throw the CEM-70 in to the mix?

I guess portability?

In that price range - GTD E.Fric is probably best option - except it is larger / heavier and can carry 30Kg.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vlaiv said:

I guess portability?

In that price range - GTD E.Fric is probably best option - except it is larger / heavier and can carry 30Kg.

Indeed, portability is key. On top of that, payloads over ~12kg photographic are not relevant to my use case (bad back, have my own weight limits to take into account).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's always going to be some sacrifices because of the number of restrictions.  From what I can tell these are what you might call portable:-

SXD2/SXP2 (as discussed)
Ioptron CEM40 (and smaller already noted)
RST-135 (already mentioned)
Crux140 (13kg imaging payload, similar concept to RST135)
AstroTrac 360 GEM (Just enough payload for requirements at 10kg)
Panther TTS160 (above value threshold and individual components may still be too heavy)
Avalon Instruments M-Zero (only 8kg capacity for individual 'scope)
Losmandy GM811G (fits all criteria?  Also the GM8 for less capacity)
Fornax Lightrack II (stated as 12kg max payload with c/w but have no experience with this type of mount, I think the max imaging time is limited to about 100 mins before a rewind is needed).

I can't think of any more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You lot will be death of my wallet! 😄

Early Christmas present from the missus came in the very red shape of an RST-135! 🥰 Guess she was well sick of my indecision. 😆

We all love a good setup shot, so here's mine after re-cabling, troubleshooting and general tinkering:

IMG_1020.thumb.JPG.83356541a86c1f726a5670d338efadc6.JPG

Early reports are that everything works as expected with 0 hiccups and 0 problems.

The little RST-135 may not be premium in some people's eyes but having fondled the thing in and out for the past 24h, it definitely feels premium to me.

With no use for counterweights (there's no backdrive with my setup), this whole setup ended up weighing 2kg less than my previous, AZ-GTi + Berlebach Report, setup, so definitely a win for both portability and my back! 🤘

Big thanks to all of you for the help and planting the seed of the RST-135 firmly in my head. It was undoubtedly the right choice for my needs.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.