Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Meade eyepieces


Recommended Posts

Hello and welcome to the forum.

They are reported to be good eyepieces but their apparent field of view falls a little short of 100 degrees I believe. They seem to be measured at around 88 degrees.

Is this the one you have ?

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/486454-15mm-meade-mwa-is-in/?p=6368899

 

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Louis D said:

If you are referring to the Meade MWA 15mm, they're actually not all that new.  In fact, they've been discontinued by Meade and are sold out at most retailers.

Here's a review of them under the Omegon Panorama II brand name.

I think those fall short of the full claimed AFoV as well:

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/595495-omegon-panorama-ii/

 

 

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Due to edge distortion compressing the outer part, they provide the same TFOV at a given focal length as competitors' 100 degree AFOV eyepieces which stretch the outer part to get to 100 degrees.  Effective AFOV (eAFOV) is about 90 degrees for both variations on 100 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Louis D said:

... Effective AFOV (eAFOV) is about 90 degrees for both variations on 100 degrees.

It's a pity that they have 100 degrees AFOV printed on them in big white letters.

Keeps the marketing people happy I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Louis D said:

Due to edge distortion compressing the outer part, they provide the same TFOV at a given focal length as competitors' 100 degree AFOV eyepieces which stretch the outer part to get to 100 degrees.  Effective AFOV (eAFOV) is about 90 degrees for both variations on 100 degrees.

That would be profound angular magnification distortion if the percentage were that large.  I haven't read anyone whose review mentioned a high degree of AMD in this eyepiece.

The people measuring the eyepieces used tests that revealed the narrower apparent fields than claimed.

A simple daylight test would reveal if the eyepieces have pincushion distortion (which I suspect) or barrel distortion.  If the latter, a simple billboard test would reveal the AMD.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.