Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

M101 - please critique


Recommended Posts

spacer.pngHi all,
Here's my first effort with enough patience to get a reasonable total exposure time - just under 4 hours after I'd filtered out the worst subs.
Please point out what you think I could improve in my processing, which is exclusively in Siril and GIMP.
Sky was Bortle 6 (according to Clear Outside) but there's loads of local lighting surround me. I had lots background gradient to remove.

M101

 

Edited by LuckieEddie
Tried different image attachment method
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats a really nice effort, well done. First thing I noticed though was the background sky was totally black (black point has clipped off some of the data) which does make the target object stand out but you are wasting some of your hard earned data by doing that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Craig. I did deliberately push the blacks down to help squash the noise but I think the compression that SGL's applied to the image is what's actually completely clipping it. If I zoom right in on the uncompressed version in the link I can still see faint noise. I was having some trouble getting a link to show an image in this forum, maybe I've still not got it right.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, that’s a fine M101, nicely framed, focused and round, tight stars. Good colour and detail also. I’d agree that the data looks black point clipped, maybe you were tempted to do this to remove gradients, but as @CraigT82 has pointed out, this loses some of your hard earned data.  At 4 hrs integration from a middling sky, there will still be some noise present, but a stronger stretch will show the fainter regions. I think some more data would give you more options when processing, this is well on the way to being a M101 an experienced imager would be proud of.👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:

Is it just me or is the forum not loading the image properly? If I click on it though I get this:

1616447282530.thumb.jpg.5ae10b30e630fb1eae2a01c2d194814f.jpg

 

Anyway, some nice spiral detail there! It's not an easy target so we'll done, I say!

I would have said it was too dark, but like you when I clicked on it, a brighter version appears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just editing the original post to try attaching the image in a different way. Hopefully that's cleared it up.

Anyway, thanks for all your positive comments on the image (once correctly displayed!) I'm very encouraged.

So, my immediate takeaways are: You can never have too much total exposure time, and I need to learn more about how the forum works. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.