Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

ARP GALAXIES


Mike JW

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I had another go at Arp 285 tonight to see if I could get any hint of the jet or tidal tail- but still no joy for me. It was a little less breezy than previous attempts, so I could get 20second exposures before field rotation became an issue. The moon, although nearly full, was still low and Arp 285 almost at the zenith for me, so not quite ideal, but pretty close. But...I still didn't get it...so maybe wait another week or so 'til the moon is well away.

706238214_Arp28519Mar22_23_14_02.png.6b0d0c54e03e5ca60633d9b781fc083a.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A poor attempt by comparison to the other images on this thread but, this is a capture from last night of Arp 104 / NGC 5216  & 5218 or Keenans System at circa 185 MLY.

May not be much to look at but rewarding nonengc5216.keenans_2022.3.19_21_11_31.png.7dd6c22ada562cf94dd090dd4a429e0a.png the less!!

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arp 285 - much better conditions last night. The shot below: reduced the noise right down to leave the tidal jet/tail clearly visible but faint. If I adjust the settings differently I could not get any hint of the tidal stream between the two galaxies so I reckon it is beyond my set up and unless I started doing long exposures but I shall not go there.

447955596_Arp28524Mar22_06_58_54.png.a3226d0a66613f98d3b8bbaf20a6c30c.png

Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arp 233, also known as UGC 5720. It also has the designation of VV 1370 (N?). Arp thought it was a galaxy with the appearance of fission. The VV classification suggests that there could be a tight group of galaxies. In colour images it is very blue, indicating starburst activity.; is this because it is actually a group but if it is just one galaxy then it must have interreacted with some other galaxy, but what is the candidate for this interaction? NED classifies it as Im Pec = dwarf galaxy that is messed up.

747535670_Arp23324Mar22_07_40_05.png.1f1583fbb2d92767a5c67364d9529f65.png

Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bill

Great capture., the bridge is definitely discernible. I had a go at Arp 104 / Keenan's System this evening. Here is my capture for comparison.

Using a smaller scope a 100mm F8 refractor with circa 0.5 focal reduction and lodestar mono x 2 also - so a much wider field but no sign of the bridge!

Pat

NGC5216.Keenans_2022.3.25_20_41_14.png.df392cee02c4ba0bd73c0d504490269c.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit of an Arp-fest last night, taking in some of the vistas in Ursa Major and Canes Venatici:

  • Arp 18
  • Arp 27
  • Arp 269
  • Arp 281
  • Arp 299

I can only find 269 previously posted on this thread (twice by @Mike JW) here:

so I'll just add my images here, and not repeat the discussion.  The widefield gives some nice context, but the narrow is pretty similar to previous postings.

For the others, I'll add separate posts once I've absorbed some of the information and background on them.

Tony

 

96820152_Arp26925Mar22_21_07_02.thumb.jpg.c211504796ebaee12cbbd62618cec54f.jpg

 

1655666273_Arp26925Mar22_21_07_09.jpg.0e70d81383f37eaa59b25f7f116b0539.jpg

 

Edited by AKB
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arp 18

So much going on here.  Arp 18 turns out to be NGC 4088, VV 357, and in the wider field we also have VV 1504 and NGC 4085, plus a host of more distant galaxies.

The close-up of NGC 4088 shows why it is described as "spiral with detached segments".   The catalogue shows it to be 40 Mly distant but 'nearby' galaxy PGC 38369 is much further away at 845 Mly.  Even more distant are PGC 3411579  (mag 18, 1045 Mly) and PGC 3411583 (mag 18.7, 2663 Mly).

 

NGC 4085 and vicinity

62 Mly away, classified as SABc(bar) is magnitude 12, and easily outshone by the magnitude 8/9/10 stars in the same field.  PGC 3411573 is aroung 3.5 Gly away.

 

VV 1504

This galaxy cluster is about  900 Mly distant, but PGC 3411607 is around 3.3 Gly and magnitude 19.

 

All in all, another splendid area of sky (but there again, what isn't?)

 

Tony

 

 

17059155_Arp1825Mar22_22_33_48.thumb.jpg.6223b9de6251bb5421f56c5d0116e43b.jpg

 

61862974_Arp1825Mar22_20_41_44.jpg.521bbb50a0b205a944862cd886001ab1.jpg    1620716495_Arp1826Mar22_13_56_09.jpg.d6365154e12384cf99c5a6674a16d0cb.jpg

 

866799220_Arp1826Mar22_15_36_17.jpg.1475b8c4d51a1a41a1e61f66bda68dce.jpg    1566256293_Arp1826Mar22_13_54_47.jpg.1cdd058e3ce8b8188c4ce843e5d6646a.jpg

Edited by AKB
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tony,

So much of interest that I have been back to your post three times now just to absorb the features - housework has been abandoned!!!

Last night I decided to visit Arp 18.

In addition to Tony's notes - it is a grand design spiral. Arp refers to a detached segment which I presume is the bit at the top. Classified as SAB(rs)bc H11 = intermediate spiral with fairly tight arms, no ring and buzzing with star formation. It belongs to the M109 group of galaxies.

623115008_Arp1827Mar22_10_26_15.png.cbdbeceb735fd85edcabde03b3741690.png

VV 1504 intrigued me because it is classified as a distant pair with a bridge, indicating there is an interaction going on. Could I pick up the bridge? Aladin image for comparison. Maybe I got a hint??? Need to do a longer exposure.

 

1985026257_VV150427Mar22_10_38_29.png.8431b9fb1bed7f5a4e4850a316bd5bef.pngimage.png.91ba9cc815c7a3cd0dd951ca9e8bdd1d.png

Mike

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prompted by the recent views views of Arp 82 posted by AKB towards the current end of this thread https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/349834-cancer-arp-82-shk-185-hickson-37/?do=findComment&comment=4226745 I had another look at this fine specimen last night.

966215725_Arp8227Mar22_15_26_40.png.29144f120ece8245066f9120748329bd.png

 

Rather a lot of subs because I left it running while I popped into the lounge to talk to my wife!

Edited by Bill S
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arp 27

Another one from my recent Arp-fest.  This reminded me of Arp 1.

NGC 3631 is described as "spiral with one heavy arm" and Arp's notes include the comment "Note straight arms, absorbtion tube crossing from inside to outside of S arm."

Not quite sure what I am looking for here, so if someone can point out or explain further, that would be great.

I can only find two other galaxies in the wider field with discernable shapes:

  • PGC 34523 – mag 15.6, type Sab(mult), 712 Mly
  • CGCG268-023 – mag 14.7, type E(compact), 489 Mly, with two other galaxies of similar distance in the zoomed field and also a couple of quasars.

What's not to like?

 

 

1921744095_Arp2727Mar22_17_35_31.jpg.bec5ea044589d6512135fc6f4c354816.jpg

 

288296896_Arp2727Mar22_13_20_53.jpg.beb409b7b0421b18277fb6e16ef7b6d2.jpg   

 

1253908494_Arp2727Mar22_17_38_06.jpg.1aa4d7ca697c280b4691301ad2fed851.jpg    669398966_Arp2727Mar22_17_40_24.jpg.4bf5f8049ac1952e7e97a35afa4f8d48.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too recently took a look at Arp 27.

My suggestion of the features - see below. Open to the idea that the labels are incorrect.

184532000_Arp2727Mar22_18_22_24.png.91825f24f3d74e97ccd888e0937c4ba9.png

Image processed using the latest Jocular version - definitely helps to bring out features as well as the resolution power of my Dob.

Mike

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Mike JW said:

My suggestion of the features

Thanks for that.  Makes sense to me.

Should I be worried that one of the stars directly below it, and at about 1 o'clock from the little galaxy which is PGC 2432364, has apparently moved a bit to the right ... ?

574631118_Arp2728Mar22_11_44_04.jpg.ae2fad28eb9f5f74aa18150ff4f11f6a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/03/2022 at 14:04, PatG said:

A poor attempt by comparison to the other images on this thread but, this is a capture from last night of Arp 104 / NGC 5216  & 5218 or Keenans System at circa 185 MLY

Pat - the 22,000 light year bridge between the two galaxies is a hard target. NGC 5218 (at the top) has a counter tail (heading North, up) - just got a hint of it. NGC 5216 also has a counter tail, curving down and to the right - reasonably clear in my shot. These two galaxies are seriously interacting and giving each other a hard time!

Here is my recent attempt, prompted by your post.

989703934_Arp10427Mar22_15_09_50.png.675d7f9aeeb3f14cace4a02f5a1d1614.png

Mike

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arp 214 and friends

Yet another Arp from my recent haul, and, again, so much to see.

The wide-field landscape image covers about one degree across the diagonal.  Before moving on to the narrower labelled eyepiece field, take a moment to spot FGC 1259, the little edge-on spiral at the middle of the bottom edge of the image.  This is mag 17 at a distance of 483 Mly.

For the larger objects, we have:

  • Arp 214 / VV 1449 / NGC 3718
  • NGC 3729
  • Arp 322 / VV 150 / Hickson 56 / UGC 6527

 

Arp 214

Arp noted this as "Barred spiral, sharp nucleus, narrow absorption lanes through the centre" which is a pretty good summary.  This image here compares favourably with that of Robert Gendler using a 12.5" RC, f9, with 150 minutes of exposure, as shown in the The Arp Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies.  No hint, though, of the faint extended peripheral structure shown in a hand-drawn diagram along side that, which was based on a separate image from a larger scope.

The notes in the atlas say:

  • "NGC 3718 is mag 10.7, 9.2' x 4.4', and SB(s)a pec  (Seyfert 2).  It is a LINER (Low-Ionization Nuclear Emission-line Region) galaxy, possibly interacting with NGC 3729, following to the E.  Called a barred spiral, but the bar is an absorption structure, not stars."

 

NGC 3729

Classified as Sa(bar, ring, mult) this is mag 11.5 at a distance of 67 Mly.  It shows really great structure.  The labelled galaxy PGC 3400984 is mag 18 at some 2.2 Gly.

 

Arp 322

Looks like every catalogue wanted to claim this group!  As well as the galaxy chain (left to right A – E, components B,C,& D are Seyfert 2 galaxies), at a distance of about 400 Mly, there's a couple of quasars sitting in there too, apparently.

 

Real value for money, this area.

Tony

 

60220008_Arp21425Mar22_22_32_15.thumb.jpg.910ef063489b5c99ecaf9fb1eeee32c9.jpg

 

1090994477_Arp21425Mar22_20_26_17.jpg.9148c8e296f98545a71d6ddc192f83cd.jpg    1274026422_Arp21427Mar22_18_05_24.jpg.9b3d30d3e85c5f67179ac5bb8b28b761.jpg

 

 

156473966_Arp21428Mar22_15_45_54.jpg.398f308840bbea238a9986b00baf3778.jpg    2088621214_Arp21426Mar22_21_31_13.jpg.7b7453e246cb1aa9a85fc57f78e67311.jpg

 

 

 

 

Edited by AKB
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too have been going through the UMA Arps in the last few sessions, so great to see your wonderful collection of shots/info. I always get a thrill out of hunting down edge on galaxies; the FGCs. It always gives me a buzz to find the faint ones so your FGC 1259 does it for me!! (must get a life?).

Arp 214  from a few days ago. Tricky to know how best to tweak the sliders to get the best overall view. I have managed to get some detail associated with the curving dust lane (especially on the right). On the right hand side above the curving dust lane is an almost straight dark line (artefact is my first thought) and then on the left side, below the curving dust lane is a dark spot - another artefact. SEE my second shot with red lines indicating these features.

Checking against quality images - they are both real - amazed.

 1723801949_Arp21429Mar22_16_09_08.png.f394f48530310cf21d4f24b9c4f4912b.png

434538580_Arp21429Mar22_16_09_08lines.png.0e33f27b1a862d22f35835cc16d3c640.png

 and finally here is the same shot but with different annotations and tweaked differently - some very faint stuff brought out in this shot.

1161273414_Arp21426Mar22_05_58_30.png.7947002709125c73aa6bf78985bb73a9.png

 

Arp 322 - I think I will post my shot of this into the Hickson thread, as Hick 56 with any suitable info.

Mike

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/03/2022 at 23:16, roelb said:

Imaged Arp 104 "The Keenan's System - Bridge" back in 2020.

Had a go at this last night... not observed it previously.

Actually, I had two attempts: one at the start of the session; one towards the end.

  • The wide field (1º x 0.76º) captures NGC 5205, and (centre bottom) flat-ish UGC 8491
  • Late evening (22:45) clearly shows the bridge, but it's pushing into the noise even at 15 minutes worth
  • Early evening  (21:05) the bridge is barely visible after 10 minutes.

I think that the darker sky a bit later makes the main difference here.

I enjoyed giving this a go, so thanks to @roelb for the inspiration.

Tony

 

578249849_Arp10402Apr22_11_57_41.thumb.jpg.46c2cdcbe1fe4217d165172b0459e95e.jpg

 

1048452964_Arp10401Apr22_22_46_28.jpg.6ba25870133da9a43b6602ba6a922acb.jpg    2105012531_Arp10401Apr22_22_45_44.jpg.5a932af52ab3c2a12af4b479d7f95a45.jpg

 

776557422_Arp10401Apr22_21_05_20.jpg.2e48f7624a4fd09bc7ccade0cd4f4537.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.