Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Counter weights


Recommended Posts

Give me your thoughts on the correct use of counter weights. Obviously we all know they are for balancing the mount, but I see lots of variation to position and number.

I have seen some setups with more than one weight but positioned very close to the mount. Other people using a single weight far towards the end of the bar. I would have thought that using the smallest amount of weight to acheve balance would be right, but perhaps there is something I am missing.

This doesn’t affect my set up yet, neq5 130 newt. The mount came with two weights but with my small mirror I only need one weight at about the half way point.

Is there any rhyme or reason or is it all personal preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose that if you want to keep a set-up as light as possible, then using a lighter weight at the end of the counter balance arm is ideal. If however you want to add/swap & change scopes or accessories as the night progresses where the balance might change significantly, then having an extra weight or having adjustability in the weight being used is preferrable.  If however, the mount is set up permanently and the same scope is to be used every time, then there's an argument for using a heavy weight as close to the mount body as possible. The balancing arm could then be shortened for compactness, and reducing potential vibration issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, lenscap said:

By using more weight, closer you will minimise the moment of inertia and therefore minimise the acceleration loads and wear & tear on your motors & drive train.

Good explanation plus the flexing of the counterweight shaft is minimised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a tad on the large size, using heavy weights close in means I can get away with a shorter counterweight bar. This is a blessing in my 2.2 metre observatory as I can navigate past the telescope without having to breathe in.

Regards, Hugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.