Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


StarlightXpress Frame Store

Recommended Posts

I have an old StarlightXpress Frame store that hasn't been used for years.

After the order from "on-high" to de-clutter I was going to take it to the skip along with other old astro stuff, but thought I'd just check to see if it was working.

It appears to work fine so if any use can be found for it I would rather donate it to someone than take it to the skip.

For those not familiar with the SX original Framestore it is self contained and only needed a PC to save images. To do that there was rudimentary software and a card to insert into the PC.  Of course, being the late 1990's it was designed for use with Windows 98. To save images would require an old desktop with Windowa 98 or maybe Windows 2000 on it.

However, for taking short or long exposure images and displaying them on a screen no PC is needed.  I did use it at a star party to do just that. Showing a group of people objects they couldn't see well, if at all, through the scope directly collected quite a crowd.

In the spirit of reducing landfill, if it can be of any use to anyone who is prepared to collect it from Maidenhead I will happily give it away.

I attach images of the setup taken last week.

Ian B






Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fond memories of using one of these in my teenage years on the old 18" newt at the Kenley observatory (Croydon AS). Biggest pain was the cooling wasn't set point, and also the seeming need to constantly replace the dessicant...

Edited by coatesg

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

(I think we had it on a Win 3.11 machine too - would have been 93/94 when I learnt how to use it....)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The desiccant can be re-used after a few mins in a microwave so I never found that a big issue. I used to keep extra bags of desicant in a sealed box in the house so I could change it any time. As there were often long gaps between observing nights this seemed a prudent step.

The cooling is essentially set to maximum. In practice this isn't an issue unless you are using the setup for very specific comparison use. None of the amateur camera's, then or now, achieve more than 40 degrees below ambient and usually it's a lot less. The Sony CCD used, even back then, was pretty low noise,  so I never found the cooling to be an issue.

Still hoping someone will want to try this. When used for public viewing it feels more 'live' than images taken with a PC. Perhaps the lack of a PC in the chain proves to people they are really seeing the object 'live' and not from a website on the Internet via a nefarious connection.

I still have the software, but testing it will be problematic as I don't have an old desktop PC.

Ian B

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By WiltsStarGazer
      Having previously got some reasonable images by mounting a smart phone to the eyepiece. I thought I would try for a more sophisticated set up.
      So last night I tried to get some pictures of the moon using a Canon Eos D450 connected to a Skywatcher 130p Newtonian via a T2 connection on the eyepiece holder.
      As the camera has automatic focusing built into the lens I thought I would have to adjust the focuser on the eyepiece holder to manually get a sharp image.
      Basically the telescope acting as a manually focused lens for the camera.
      But no joy, I just got a bright light which seemed to fill the camera view finder. I tried various settings on the camera, adjusting ISO and aperture etc,  I also had some extention rings for the camera lens so tired fitting those to extend the focal length but no better.
      I sure there are many palms being slapped against foreheads reading this but as you can tell I have no idea, although I do have some of the gear.
      Any pointers and/or advise would be gratefully received.
    • By gilesco
      Just sending a query out there to anyone who has experience imaging at public sites on Dartmoor?
      Looking to learn about good locations, how this is received by the National Park authority (if imaging through the night) etc...
    • By yltansg
      I would like to share with you an article written by me on high-resolution solar imaging in different wavelengths.  Glad that the European Physics Journal (EPJ) Web of Conferences published it. You can read it at:   

      You can see the different layers of the Sun in high-resolution images using different setups.  
      Best regards.
    • By Nikolas74
      As i would like to give it a try with a color camera and therefore need the funds i am selling my Mono camera setup.
      All come in original boxes in excellent working condition, filters have been in the filter wheel since i bought them.
      Atik 383l+ Mono boxed with all extras £900
      Astrodon Ha 3nm 36mm boxed £620 SOLD
      Astrodon Oiii 3nm 36mm boxed £620 SOLD
      Astrodon Lum 36mm boxed £180 SOLD
      I will be happy to send any photos to someone who is interested.
      Payment via Paypal in Uk Pounds or Euros (buyer will pays the fees if any)
      Safe and Secured shipping with tracking number. Postage expenses by me.
      Many thanks

    • By Adumbleton
      Wanted: Celestron Nightscape 8300 CCD camera to replace a faulty unit.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.