Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Meade SCT 12" or Flextube 12"/14"?


Recommended Posts

With the help with the guys here, I narrowed my options down to Skywatcher 14" Flextube GoTo. I more or less know what to expect from such a scope (had the 12" version for a year). However, I suddenly realised, I'd like to have the option of building a small observatory and a Dobsonian won't be the ideal option. Having the best of both worlds, aperture and physical size, I narrowed it down to the 'Meade LX90 12". To be honest, it's the top end of my budget and I'm not completely sure what to expect. I used the Celestron 11" SCT many years back. But it was brief and don't remember how it performed. 

 

1. I'm aware of the narrower field of view (F10 I think), how much do I lose bearing in mind I mostly observe DSO? 

2. How tolerant is it to mid-quality eyepieces? Is it as fussy as a  Dob?

3. How contrasty are the views compared to a reflector telescope?

 

Thanks!

 1210-90-03.gif.d4473fb4d5b892ecf4e7b20fa363ae20.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had three Meade 12" SCT's, you will need an observatory as they are HEAVY if used with the fork mount. There are only a handful of DSO's that don't fit into the field of a low power eyepiece and reasonably priced eyepieces work well at F10. I would expect that the contrast and brightness would be marginally better in a Newtonian of comparable size. The collimation and aluminising of the SCT should hold up much longer than the Newtonian.   ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1: DSOs covers a multitude of objects from teeny weeny to enormous, I've got a 10" SCT which is good for little galaxies and nebula or bits of big nebula.

2: Works well with " cheap eyepieces "

3: Not as contrasty as refractor but not done a comparison with  Newtonian, not much difference I should think.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davey-T said:

1: DSOs covers a multitude of objects from teeny weeny to enormous, I've got a 10" SCT which is good for little galaxies and nebula or bits of big nebula.

2: Works well with " cheap eyepieces "

3: Not as contrasty as refractor but not done a comparison with  Newtonian, not much difference I should think.

Dave

Thinking about mounting an 80mm apo on top ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Peter Drew said:

I've had three Meade 12" SCT's, you will need an observatory as they are HEAVY if used with the fork mount. There are only a handful of DSO's that don't fit into the field of a low power eyepiece and reasonably priced eyepieces work well at F10. I would expect that the contrast and brightness would be marginally better in a Newtonian of comparable size. The collimation and aluminising of the SCT should hold up much longer than the Newtonian.   ?

It'll be stored in the conservatory which is right next to the garden deck. It's a matter of moving it a 100/150cm really. Will that become old too quickly? I mean, a 14" Dob is HEAVY too, probably heavier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only got limited experience here Emad, but I reckon most objects would be OK  (except large nebulae) with a narrower FOV, and GoTo also makes up for it.  I don't think you'd lose much in contrast terms, and an f/10 should be very forgiving with EPs.

12" and GoTo on a cat sounds great to me!

Doug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You get different reviews on sct,s,i ave owned 4,and still have 1,the 12" is a cracking scope,i really regret selling it,and still dont know why i did just my opinion.

Jupiter with 12".....the pic in my sig was also with this scope.

j.jpg.e2b98f82a9dd7839f7a4996e1480e3a7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, paul mc c said:

I had this exact setup about 4 years ago. I don' remember how the telescope performed, used it very briefly. I nevertheless remember, vivdly,  that the C11 on EQ6 was noticeably wobbly. A fork is likely to be more stable (although the xl90 tripod looks undersized?). I very much prefer an alt-az mount. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, emadmoussa said:

I'm sorry Peter, refresh my memory, was it you who bought the 200mm reflector from me, I think, 4 years ago? 

I don't think so, there again my memory isn't what it used to be!  ?  A Baader zoom would work well with the SCT, you would need a separate wide field low power eyepiece to accompany it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone from my society got a bargain Meade 12" SCT LX200. Lovely condition. All functioning well. 6 months leter he hardly uses it. It's too heavy to set up (he keeps it in a consevatory and just have to move it out through the doors and the tube seems to take ages (eg: a couple of hours) to stabilise temperature wise and sometimes even when it has adjuested, struggles to keep up with changing temps during a session.

A 14" Skywatcher Flextube dob might face similar setup issues though, but the temp adjustment is not going to be an issue. Personally I feel that a 12" dob is at the limit of what is comfortable but perhaps I'm a little puny and not dedicated enough ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not go for an Orion Optics UK 14 inch dob or OTA? Get the 1/10 mirror. There you have a solid but lightweight tube (also a carbon fibre option), so less collimation faff when set up scaffold OTA. Their variable friction device works well.

I would like a fork mounted SCT, have an OTA C8, so only need a mount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.