Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Jupiter around midnight on the 27th May from Dorking


broadway1

Recommended Posts

Hi MilwaukeeLion,

For planetary imaging I've got noticeably better results since moving to the C14 simply because of the aperture increase. I have no regrets about moving up from a C11 Edge for this purpose. But naturally you have to weigh up the personal satisfaction of an incremental improvement in your own results versus the cost. And you will know of course that there are other things which have helped in planetary imaging such as using an ADC, fantastic software from Firecapture, Autostakkert, Registax, and WINJUPOS, and getting a computer with heaps of RAM. I've also found a 2 inch diameter Barlow (actually a Powermate) made for a slight improvement over a 1.25 inch set-up because it is more rigid and fits very well into the Meade focuser I use.  For deep sky imaging (I use a QSI 583wsg with a focal reducer) the C14 works for smaller targets.

Clear skies, John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.