Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

DeepSkyMan

EdgeHD and SteelTrack a Marriage Not Made in Heaven

Recommended Posts

Okay folks, so, for a variety of reasons, including but not least an appalling sequence of poor weather since my last post on this particular topic, I have been unable to obtain an accurate measurement of the focal length off my 8” EdgeHD incorporating Baader SteelTrack Focuser and Click-lock Diagonal.  I managed to remedy this situation over the weekend just past.

Initial measurements based on adding the optical path of each of the components together, had the complete resulting optical path at about 2400mm, however this was not bourne out in practice.  Using my 22mm T4 Nagler, at 2400mm focal length this should have given approx 45’ TFOV.  Using M81 and M82 as a yardstick (approximate separation 36’), they should easily have been visible in the same field of view, however they were not.  Extrapolating back from these values seems to be indicating a focal length somewhere  between 3000 and 3225, which makes the revised speed of the system a whopping F15 to F16.  This must be having a significant detrimental impact on the sub-aperture correction inherent in the Edge HD design, so I’m thinking of removing the Steeltrack from the system and replacing with a FeatherTouch or equivalent.  This measurement is actually consistent with a drift measurement I made last year, (instructions courtesy of Don Pensack), but discarded due to it being so far removed from the expected result nearer 2400mm.  But the proof as they say is in the pudding.  So for those considering adding a Crayford to their EdgeHD, based on this experience I would say don’t.   From feedback on this topic in CN, it is very possible that it is something to do with either the slightly faster primary/secondary combination in th EdgeHD and/or the sub-aperture correction in the baffle tube, possibly resulting in significant vignetting. (Thanks to Don Pensack and Edggie from CN, for their input).  If you are interested in reading the CN thread discussing this you can find it here:

 

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/574002-calculating-effective-focal-length-of-an-edgehd/

 

Kind Regards

Paul.

Edited by DeepSkyMan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found something similar with my maksutov and measured the effect with a microguide eyepiece. The further back the eyepiece is the longer the effective focal length of the scope becomes. I noticed this when putting on a dual speed focuser or putting a filter wheel in the path. Now if I'm measuring double stars refractors or reflectors have the advantage of having a fixed focal length so they only need calibrating once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paz, I was aware that there would be some increase in FL as a result of introducing the SteelTrack, based on a rule of thumb for SCTs which says that FL is increased by 10mm for every 3.1mm of backfocus.  On this basis I should have been looking at approx 2400mm FL, and I was happy to wear this, even though this would have hurt the correction in the Edge design, and any potential vignetting would have been acceptable to me at this FL.  But this past weekends results show that the 3.1mm rule of thumb obviously does not hold true for the EdgeHD, and an increase to in excess of 3000mm is definitely indicating that the quality of the optical delivery has been severely compromised.

 

Paul.

Edited by DeepSkyMan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad you come to the conclusion.:thumbsup:

When I got C8 for some years ago, I did read quite a lot on CN, when Eddgie had numerous posts about the disadvantage of increase back focus with accessaries, therefore I haven't bother to add any external focuser to it.

To my understanding, increase FL with narrower TFOV and possible vignetting with max TROV eyepieces are minor fault, the biggest one the spherical aberration correction is too far away from the optimal, which has major impact on image quality.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep - that's the conclusion I came to when I owned an Edge C8 - stuck with existing focuser after reading all the threads on CN - and YKSE's expert light path calculations on SGL. Shame because the Steeltracks are lovely focusers - I have a Newtonian one on my Lunt solar scope and like it very much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Tugboat
      I'm having a bit of a clearout to make way for a new project.  For sale here are a couple of items that have seen very litle use:
      1) Celestron Omni CG-4 GEM Mount + Tripod - £125 *** SOLD ***
      This is in generally very good condition.  There are a few marks, and scuffs consistent with normal use.  There are also a couple of minor (small) patches of surface rust on a few of the bolts and steel legs.  It has seen very litle use, and has been in storage for the past few years so it is time to find it a good home.  The small rubber tips that go on the very end of the feet have perished, so these won't be included.
      It includes tubular steel tripod, 2 counterweights, built in polar scope, built in bubble level and slow motion controls.
      Due to size and weight, collection would be preferred from the RG27 area.  If you are reasonably local, I would also consider delivering.
      Price: £125, but I am open to offers.  Payment can be made via Bank Transfer (preferred), Paypal or cash on collection
      2) ***SOLD*** Celestron Omni XLT 127mm Telescope ***SOLD ***
      Again this is in very good condition, and has been in storage for the past few years and has had very little overall use.  A few marks on the dovetail as is to be expected.
      It includes a small finderscope, diagonal and a 25mm eyepiece
      Can be collected from the RG27 area, I could deliver if you are reasonably local, or can be posted for an additional £8.
      Price: £110, but am open to offers.  Payment can be made via Bank Transfer (preferred), Paypal or cash on collection *** NOW SOLD ***
      Any questions please do let me know.










    • By Gregely
      Hi SGL
      I popped this topic on CN too but noone seems to know anything.

      I came by an old Celestron Ultima 8 pre-PEC. I really like the scope and the mount it may be that I have read too much of Uncle Rod's and other's praise that I feel this scope has some intangible personality and charm.
      Anyway...
      Circuitry in the base seems to work fine even though the batteries don't hold charge but drive the Ra axis . I have 2 replacement on its way to me.
      Now my issue: It didn't come with a hand controller. I know it is not needed for tracking, and I don't have a Dec motor but I find it would be useful for centering in RA and D.A.R.V. method drift alignment.
      I was on the verge of making a crude controller out of veroboard and 4 momentary switches that I thought to be correct from the info on various sites, but then I came across an Ultima 8 project that clearly showed the hand controller for my scope.
      The pic attached is the one.
       
      I am looking for help on how the dial and buttons are wired in and/or photos of the innards of the hand controller or if anyone knows what else is inside the handbox.
      The sources I was going on so far is a combination of the following 3 links:
      https://www.cloudyni...ding/?p=8015749
      https://onstep.group...in/message/6300
      https://github.com/garlick/ultima8/blob/master/base/README.md
       
      These of course don't include drive rate rotary switch in the middle and if I could I would really like to to restore the full ability of this mount without spending too much  on electronics. Plus I don't want to spend time and effort on wiring something that doesn't work.
       
      Oh and lastly I have no background  or experience in electronics just own a soldering station and a whole lot of determination.
       
      Thanks in advance
      Greg

    • By astronomer2002
      I am selling a JMI focus motor for Meade SCT's.
      It has a replacement controller as the original was lost many years ago. Works fine on a LX200.
      Asking £40 for complete unit and controller plus £5 if you need it posted.
       
      *****************   SOLD   ******************
       




    • By sonnymoon
      It's an ED80 with the stock focuser. I think there is some astigmatism somewhere as my stars can be a little stretched and so I want to see if I can use a collimating laser to check if the focuser is in straight. (I'm also going to make a determined effort to get the spacing right between the FF//FR and the sensor, but that's another story). I can't see any threads that get into the detail of lining up the focuser with a laser. 
      If I put the laser in with the target bit facing up, then the red dot that bounces back off of the lens is slightly off centre on the target on the collimator. If I loosen the screws, turn through 90deg, retighten and look again, then the red dot is in a different place and so on all the way through 360 deg. I'm thinking that the red dot should be central (as when collimating a Dob that I used to have). Is that right?
      It may be that the laser needs collimating, but I'm not sure how to do that.
      Any advice on whether this approach is going to get me anywhere would be appreciated.
       
    • By ICR_2019
      Hi All
      I thought I would share how I fixed my sloppy rack and pinion focuser on Skywatcher 130p.
      The issue? When using or collimating the slop in the focuser would put the target or centre dot way out of line.
      With the tube tilted downward I removed the 4 screws/nuts  of the focuser to remove it from the OTA.
      Loosen the lock  and 2 adjusting screws, I used a small torx screwdriver as i did't have an allen key small enough.
      Remove the 4 screws holding the adjuster bar in place, and remove the adjuster.
      Note: Be careful to avoid the very sticky grease used on the drive!
      Remove the draw tube assembly, remove the lock/adjusting shim located at the top of the main body.
      There were 2 plastic shims 1 each side of the drive I removed both of them.
       Thoroughly clean everything with degreaser and isopropyl alcohol except the drive itself.
      I cut 2 plastic shims from food packaging, cleaned them, and using 50mm double sided tape I lined out the main focuser body. Be careful to cut to the correct size and shape before installing and don't cover the drive or lock/adjusting shim areas.
      Next using teflon tape purchased from eBay I covered the draw tube exterior.
      I then did the same covering the plastic shims in the main body.
      It was still a little loose so I doubled the teflon tape at the top of the tube either side of the adjusting shim.
      Next I added a plastic shim onto the adjuster shim and covered with teflon tape.
      Put it all back together and almost no slack!
      I can now move the focuser from fully in to fully out without the collomation moving out of the centre ring on the primary.
      Complete success I think.
       
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.