Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


Recommended Posts

Does anyone have experience with a celestron sky portal? The app says i need to purchase starsense auto align which costs a lot while the sky portal wifi module connects to wifi for one third of the price. Do they both accomplish the same thing? can I just get the lesser expensive one to accomplish connecting my telescope to my phone via wifi? Any experience or help would be much appreciated.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would love to have a sky portal, but nobody in the states has any in stock, and am pretty sure you dont need star sense to use it, i brought sky sarfira already to use with it. Just wish i could buy one.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use SkyPortal for telescope control, but am not a fan.

I have a Celestron Cosmos 90 WiFi setup. The mount comes with the WiFi base station built in to the mount. Celestron produced this setup as a companion to a "Cosmos" TV series broadcast in the USA. The mount is designed to be controlled by a smartphone or tablet. The instruction manual refers to a "Navigator" app, but this does not seem to exist on the Celestron site or Google Play Store. Fortunately, the Celestron "SkyPortal" free app seems to have replaced "Navigator". To get the app to work with the mount, you have to persuade your tablet to ignore your home WiFi hub, and instead, lock on to the "SkyQLink-xx" network. The SkyPortal app will then connect when you press the telescope button at the bottom of the screen. Once connected, the display adds a circle + cross-hair target, showing where it thinks the telescope is pointed. It also adds a slider bar to select slewing rate and Left/right/up/down buttons to the sides of the screen. Then comes the tricky bit!

I have found that the biggest problem comes when attempting final alignment on a star. With your eye fixed looking through the eyepiece, it is almost impossible to find, and use, the virtual buttons. Unlike, with a conventional handset, with a tablet there is no tactile feedback; so you do not know if your finger is over the "button", until the mount moves.

I have 3, almost identical mounts, (1) Skywatcher Skymax with a Synscan handset, (2) Celestron Skyprodigy with starsense camera and associated handset, and (3) the Cosmos WiFi + 8" Samsung tablet. (1) is quick to align at dusk with "Brightest Star" 2-star alignment, (2) slightly faster, when darker, with more stars visible, as a fully-automatic self-alignment, and (3) has had very little use as I find it takes an age to achieve alignment, particularly when I know that I am centred on a particular star and the app refuses to accept it for alignment; {there have been many times that I have given up, and used (1) or (2)}.

I have added a "Kill power" switch to the mount, because there have been a couple of occasions when the mount has taken off at full speed at the same time as the WiFi link has dropped out.

The mount is designed to take an "optional hand control" but neither the instruction manual, nor the Celestron web site, have been helpful with further details.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an early Celestron Evolution that suffers from flaky internal WiFi. I now turn off the internal WiFi  (via Menu in a Nexstar + HC) and instead adopt a SkyPortal external WiFi accessory with SkySafari Plus. Works superbly if a desire to control via a tablet does float your boat.

However, you ideally need one of the later SkyPortal external devices that emit the 'Celestron XX'  signal and have a Zentri chip. Early versions have the defective 'SkyQLink' signal and a Roving Networks  chip. Avoid the latter. You will need to use an APP like Net-Analyser to tell the difference.  Hence, avoid buying second hand (or risk getting the older weaker signal version). 

I suspect Celestron might have withdrawn old stock of the external SkyPortal accessory due to the problems with early models, which would also explain the current shortage whilst new modules are shipped to retailers.  

BTW, any Evolution's built since 2016 don't have the internal  WiFi issues. You also don't need Starsense to benefit from the SkyPortal APP, but it does provide a complete solution for those that want to adopt cutting edge technologies. 


Edited by noah4x4

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have great success with skyportal wifi module and starsense.

Had a few teething troubles at first but now it works flawlessly every time and always very accurate.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to resurrect a thread from a few months ago, but I've been meaning to update my impressions of the Skyportal device.

I bought one of the original devices when they first came out (back then it was called SkyQLink). Using it with an AVX mount and an iPad 2, I experienced the same sort of issues that others have reported, basically the wifi signal was not robust and performance was generally a bit flakey. It wasn't as bad as Noah's early Evolution, some nights it was usable, I really enjoyed using it, but the problems in the end pushed me back towards using the hand set. Somewhere along the way I bought a Starsense (which I am a big fan of) and used the hand set for a few years with that.

Last year I decided to try one of the new Skyportal devices, and I'm glad I did. The new device has so far proven 100% reliable, I have not had a single issue. Using alongside the Starsense eliminates pretty much all the ergonomics issues for me. I haven't used the hand controller since getting the SkyPortal. This is my set up procedure for imaging now:

  • My mount is on a pier and stays outside under a cover, so I don't need to polar align.
  • Power cycle the iPad so I know that only the SkyPortal app is running. This step might not be necessary on newer, more powerful iPads. Remember that scope control is a hard realtime task and the CPU on older iPads was not great at multi-tasking. My old iPad is sluggish/laggy even when browsing the internet, but as long as I power cycle it first, and don't run any other apps, it is nice and responsive controlling the scope.
  • Connect all cables and power up. Camera is attached to the scope and I use the camera rear LCD screen live view rather than an eyepiece.
  • in SkyPortal app, select 'Connect and Align'. Alignment takes a few seconds, less than a minute I would say. It involves four slews I think, and StarSense is plate solving the previous image while slewing to take the next one - pretty slick.
  • Select a bright star near my intended target, press goto, scope slews, star is always in the camera screen first time. I'm using an Edge HD 8 with a focal length of 2125mm so this is quite impressive I think. Focus using a Bahtinov mask.
  • Select my first target, press goto, scope slews, check target is in camera screen.
  • In Skysafari, I have my scope/camera details entered in as display parameters, so SkySafari superimposes my camera field of view over the view of the target. By comparing the stars shown in SkySafari with the stars shown in the camera screen, it is quick and easy to frame the object by slewing the scope a little or rotating the camera.
  • Once I'm happy with the framing, start PHD2 guiding. Wait a minute for guiding to stabilise, check framing again to be sure.
  • Start the intervalometer taking the planned sequence of images

In short, I'm very happy with the new version of SkyPortal alongside StarSense. Without the StarSense, as long as I was using the camera screen rather than an eyepiece, I think I would get along OK. If using an eyepiece, I think that some of the ergonomics issues would still be there.



  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My telescope is in an observatory and is aligned (home position) true north. When I turn ski portal the blue bullseye target is often set way off the direction in which the telescope is pointing why? I have used both an ipad (latest pro) and an iphone (7s).


A different issue, I have also noted screen flickering lately on both devices on the last two occasions?   

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your telescope might be physically aligned "due North", but until the APP has completed its software alignment  it has no recognition of your OTA position. It works that out from the alignment stars, and not the starting position/direction of your pedestal/tripod/pillar (which is irrelevant except for an ASPA polar align).  After the first software alignment star has been employed, the screen pointer in the APP will be closer,  but still not accurate until the software alignment has been fully completed.

Edited by noah4x4

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently acquired a SkyPortal through Amazon UK, after doing a fair bit of research.

Initial impressions are fairly good - the device is simplicity itself to install, and wifi connection was instant. Mine is fitted to a NexStar 6SE, with SkyPortal installed on my Android phone. Setting up was slightly bumpy, as I found by trial and error that not all of the possible setup methods worked with my kit. However, one did work, so that's all I needed. There was also the occasional wifi dropoff, but I understand from Prof. Google that this may be due to the phone kicking me off if the screensaver closes the display. Suggested solutions here involve disabling certain memory/battery saver apps which could be causing this issue. next time I'm out I'll try disabling one app at a time to try & identify the culprit. I don't see this as a big issue, just something I need to look at.

Anyway, with the wifi running let's proceed to the alignment process. This is a three-star alignment (you can use planets if available), requiring you to centre an object in your spotterscope, then centre it in your observing eyepiece to align the scope (repeat for each of three objects). I used Vega, Capella and Mars, and the app reported a successful alignment. I then tried selecting various objects and getting the scope to track into position. The results were fairly accurate, though I think I need to tweak my Telrad spotter slightly to improve performance.

My only "con" is that it doesn't track objects (for example to take long exposures of DSO's) but I tend to restrict my astrophotography to the Moon and planets, so I'm not that bothered.  As I use video capture anyway, I suspect that a quick tap of the centring button will keep objects in view for sufficient time to grab loads of frames for processing.

One last thing - I find it easier to use the handset to move the scope in the alignment process. Just saying...

Alan S.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Kronos831
      This is probably my options as of now:I will definetly buy a 12mm BST Starguider A 2X BST Barlow( So thats 100x and 200x magnification) 
      AND Either:
      My dobsonian telescope will include:A 25mm and 10mm Eyepiece . So the obvious awnser is to go for the 15mm BUT i ve read in reviews that the bst s have are noticabely better than the eyepieces that come with my telescope.So i am wondering, should i buy the 25mm or the 15mm BST? 
      Also is it worth to barlow either 25mm eyepiece to make 12.5mm and ditch the 12mm i am definetly buying for a 6mm one? i am thinking not because if i barlow the 6 mm it will give me 400x and i think that is too much magnification for the image to appear clear , plus i will also barlow the 10 mm to give me a 240x the acceptable limit for good clarity / magnification ratio (i ve read that and not sure if its true or not). Thanks again for your time and help!
      This forum has been very polite, welcoming and kind to noobs like me just getting into the hobby XD I hope i can one day look back at myself and laugh at my ignorance! This site has been truly amazing and i hope i can stay a member for a long time to come!
      Thanks as always
      Clear skies everyone
    • By Kronos831
      Probably a stupid question...
      Heyyy soo i am a begginer and about to buy my first telescope.A Skywatcher 200 
      p. I ve just though of something , Since i know filters can be stacked i ve been wondering if i could take visual RGB filters and stack them.Specifically blue green and red in order to create a visual full colour image ,like photography. I know its probably a stupid question because people all over the world would have done this by now .But i m just curious. 
    • By SirHarveyXXI
      Hello all, my name is Harvey and I'm very new to astronomy. After countless hours of reading beforehand, I'd like to start off by saying I know I'm not expecting to see anything close to the pictures seen on the internet from telescopes like Hubble, but something doesn't seem to be right. I have a Celestron AstroMaster 76eq, this is quite a budget telescope due to the fact my budget is less than small. These are the specs:
      700mm Focal Length 76mm Aperture Focal Ratio of 9.21  2 lenses of focal length 10mm and 20mm I'm quite young, and I've been super interested in any and all things space, so obviously getting into astronomy was a definite for me. This is hopefully going to be a life long hobby I'm gonna take up, so any tips for the future are well and truly appreciated (alongside any tips at all to help me get started). Please bare with me, I'm trying to condense this down as much as I can. 😂
      I've done a lot of research into the telescope that I have, and I've read about many people being able to see deep space objects such as Andromeda's core. I have been able to see this (at least, I'm 99% sure) however, attempting to view other deep space objects (such as M1) proves to be difficult. I'm not entirely sure if this is due to me being unable to navigate the night sky effectively, if I'm doing something wrong or I'm expecting too much. I live in a fairly rural area in England with little light pollution, and when observing these deep space objects I make sure that I'm as far away from the light pollution as I can get. This leads on to my first question...
      How much of a difference does the humidity make? England generally has VERY high levels of humidity, and I'm wondering if this is going to make a huge difference to what I can see? I've never really seen the humidity to be less than 75%, so if it makes a huge difference I presume that I won't be able to view any deep space objects? That being said, should my telescope be able to see deep space object with this level of humidity amongst other viewing problems? I try my best to ensure (like I said earlier) that I can make the viewing conditions as optimal as possible where I can (i.e. not viewing objects in the direction of light pollution, making sure that I go out in low levels of cloud, making sure I observe objects as high up in the sky as I can etc). On the subject of the telescope itself... 
      How much of a difference does collimation make? Will it be the difference between seeing an object or not if the collimation of my mirrors isn't very good? Should a telescope of my calibre be able to make out the major details of planets? e.g. the ring of Saturn and the bands of Jupiter? Or am I expecting too much of my telescope? I have just ordered a 2x Barlow lens to bring me close up to the maximum magnification my telescope can realistically handle (140x), so I'm wondering if this will help me see these finer details or if Jupiter will still be merely a bright light? How much of a difference do filters make at lower magnifications such as 70-140x on planets such as Jupiter, Saturn or Mars? Are they worth the investment this early on or are they more of an investment to make later on? How important are high quality eyepieces? Are they worth the investment early on or later on? The problem with this is that eyepieces can get quite pricey and as I said before, I'm on a very low budget.  That being said, is the level of astronomy I'm after even possible on my budget? Will I be able to see deep space objects like M1 and other nebulae? By seeing them, I mean as blurry blobs, not detailed objects.  Terribly sorry for the masses of questions (of which I'm sure most of you will have seen a thousand times!), but I've been searching for a long time and haven't found many answers relevant to my situation. As I said, I'm very open to any suggestions, tips and recommendations! Thank you for reading! If there's any more information you need, ask me and I'll try my best to give you it! 
    • By Ulysses31
      Hi Everyone, need a little help choosing the right flattener/reducer for the William Optics Zenithstar73.
       I am after one that does both jobs so that rules out the dedicated Flat73 which is just a flattener!
      So I was wondering if I could get away with the Flat6 0.8 reducer which does say it works on scopes 70 - 80mm f/6  but doesn't list the ZS73 in the models list or do I need to spend the extra and get the Flat6A11?
      Can anyone shed some light on this have email 365 where I have seen the Flat6 but had no reply.
      Thanks in advance.
    • By Lachlan
      Hello everyone, 
      As you can probably tell I’m brand new to the community. While I’ve been passionate about space related topics for my whole life, I’ve finally taken the leap and I’m about buy a simple astrophotography rig. Ive done a fair bit of research and, like many, I’ve decided that the William Optics Zenithstar 61 APO refractor is best suited for my situation. I plan to use my canon 600D/T3i as the main imaging camera and I also plan to use the Skywatcher Star Adventurer as a tracking mount for this scope. However I have a few questions:
      1: I seem to be confused about how I should connect my DSLR to the Z61. As far as I’m aware, all I need is a T-ring and the WO Flat 61 Field flattener and I should be good to go. Is that correct? 
      2: will I need a dovetail bar to mount the Z61 to the star adventurer? Or can I directly mount the z61 to the base of the star adventurer? (This was demonstrated by Trevor Jones from astrobackyard with his Z61 and the ioptron Skyguider Pro.)
      Sorry for such a long thread; I’d just hate to finally get all my gear together and find out that some gear is incompatible. 
      Thanks for the help! 

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.