Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


Recommended Posts

Does anyone have experience with a celestron sky portal? The app says i need to purchase starsense auto align which costs a lot while the sky portal wifi module connects to wifi for one third of the price. Do they both accomplish the same thing? can I just get the lesser expensive one to accomplish connecting my telescope to my phone via wifi? Any experience or help would be much appreciated.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would love to have a sky portal, but nobody in the states has any in stock, and am pretty sure you dont need star sense to use it, i brought sky sarfira already to use with it. Just wish i could buy one.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use SkyPortal for telescope control, but am not a fan.

I have a Celestron Cosmos 90 WiFi setup. The mount comes with the WiFi base station built in to the mount. Celestron produced this setup as a companion to a "Cosmos" TV series broadcast in the USA. The mount is designed to be controlled by a smartphone or tablet. The instruction manual refers to a "Navigator" app, but this does not seem to exist on the Celestron site or Google Play Store. Fortunately, the Celestron "SkyPortal" free app seems to have replaced "Navigator". To get the app to work with the mount, you have to persuade your tablet to ignore your home WiFi hub, and instead, lock on to the "SkyQLink-xx" network. The SkyPortal app will then connect when you press the telescope button at the bottom of the screen. Once connected, the display adds a circle + cross-hair target, showing where it thinks the telescope is pointed. It also adds a slider bar to select slewing rate and Left/right/up/down buttons to the sides of the screen. Then comes the tricky bit!

I have found that the biggest problem comes when attempting final alignment on a star. With your eye fixed looking through the eyepiece, it is almost impossible to find, and use, the virtual buttons. Unlike, with a conventional handset, with a tablet there is no tactile feedback; so you do not know if your finger is over the "button", until the mount moves.

I have 3, almost identical mounts, (1) Skywatcher Skymax with a Synscan handset, (2) Celestron Skyprodigy with starsense camera and associated handset, and (3) the Cosmos WiFi + 8" Samsung tablet. (1) is quick to align at dusk with "Brightest Star" 2-star alignment, (2) slightly faster, when darker, with more stars visible, as a fully-automatic self-alignment, and (3) has had very little use as I find it takes an age to achieve alignment, particularly when I know that I am centred on a particular star and the app refuses to accept it for alignment; {there have been many times that I have given up, and used (1) or (2)}.

I have added a "Kill power" switch to the mount, because there have been a couple of occasions when the mount has taken off at full speed at the same time as the WiFi link has dropped out.

The mount is designed to take an "optional hand control" but neither the instruction manual, nor the Celestron web site, have been helpful with further details.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an early Celestron Evolution that suffers from flaky internal WiFi. I now turn off the internal WiFi  (via Menu in a Nexstar + HC) and instead adopt a SkyPortal external WiFi accessory with SkySafari Plus. Works superbly if a desire to control via a tablet does float your boat.

However, you ideally need one of the later SkyPortal external devices that emit the 'Celestron XX'  signal and have a Zentri chip. Early versions have the defective 'SkyQLink' signal and a Roving Networks  chip. Avoid the latter. You will need to use an APP like Net-Analyser to tell the difference.  Hence, avoid buying second hand (or risk getting the older weaker signal version). 

I suspect Celestron might have withdrawn old stock of the external SkyPortal accessory due to the problems with early models, which would also explain the current shortage whilst new modules are shipped to retailers.  

BTW, any Evolution's built since 2016 don't have the internal  WiFi issues. You also don't need Starsense to benefit from the SkyPortal APP, but it does provide a complete solution for those that want to adopt cutting edge technologies. 


Edited by noah4x4

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have great success with skyportal wifi module and starsense.

Had a few teething troubles at first but now it works flawlessly every time and always very accurate.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to resurrect a thread from a few months ago, but I've been meaning to update my impressions of the Skyportal device.

I bought one of the original devices when they first came out (back then it was called SkyQLink). Using it with an AVX mount and an iPad 2, I experienced the same sort of issues that others have reported, basically the wifi signal was not robust and performance was generally a bit flakey. It wasn't as bad as Noah's early Evolution, some nights it was usable, I really enjoyed using it, but the problems in the end pushed me back towards using the hand set. Somewhere along the way I bought a Starsense (which I am a big fan of) and used the hand set for a few years with that.

Last year I decided to try one of the new Skyportal devices, and I'm glad I did. The new device has so far proven 100% reliable, I have not had a single issue. Using alongside the Starsense eliminates pretty much all the ergonomics issues for me. I haven't used the hand controller since getting the SkyPortal. This is my set up procedure for imaging now:

  • My mount is on a pier and stays outside under a cover, so I don't need to polar align.
  • Power cycle the iPad so I know that only the SkyPortal app is running. This step might not be necessary on newer, more powerful iPads. Remember that scope control is a hard realtime task and the CPU on older iPads was not great at multi-tasking. My old iPad is sluggish/laggy even when browsing the internet, but as long as I power cycle it first, and don't run any other apps, it is nice and responsive controlling the scope.
  • Connect all cables and power up. Camera is attached to the scope and I use the camera rear LCD screen live view rather than an eyepiece.
  • in SkyPortal app, select 'Connect and Align'. Alignment takes a few seconds, less than a minute I would say. It involves four slews I think, and StarSense is plate solving the previous image while slewing to take the next one - pretty slick.
  • Select a bright star near my intended target, press goto, scope slews, star is always in the camera screen first time. I'm using an Edge HD 8 with a focal length of 2125mm so this is quite impressive I think. Focus using a Bahtinov mask.
  • Select my first target, press goto, scope slews, check target is in camera screen.
  • In Skysafari, I have my scope/camera details entered in as display parameters, so SkySafari superimposes my camera field of view over the view of the target. By comparing the stars shown in SkySafari with the stars shown in the camera screen, it is quick and easy to frame the object by slewing the scope a little or rotating the camera.
  • Once I'm happy with the framing, start PHD2 guiding. Wait a minute for guiding to stabilise, check framing again to be sure.
  • Start the intervalometer taking the planned sequence of images

In short, I'm very happy with the new version of SkyPortal alongside StarSense. Without the StarSense, as long as I was using the camera screen rather than an eyepiece, I think I would get along OK. If using an eyepiece, I think that some of the ergonomics issues would still be there.



  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My telescope is in an observatory and is aligned (home position) true north. When I turn ski portal the blue bullseye target is often set way off the direction in which the telescope is pointing why? I have used both an ipad (latest pro) and an iphone (7s).


A different issue, I have also noted screen flickering lately on both devices on the last two occasions?   

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your telescope might be physically aligned "due North", but until the APP has completed its software alignment  it has no recognition of your OTA position. It works that out from the alignment stars, and not the starting position/direction of your pedestal/tripod/pillar (which is irrelevant except for an ASPA polar align).  After the first software alignment star has been employed, the screen pointer in the APP will be closer,  but still not accurate until the software alignment has been fully completed.

Edited by noah4x4

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently acquired a SkyPortal through Amazon UK, after doing a fair bit of research.

Initial impressions are fairly good - the device is simplicity itself to install, and wifi connection was instant. Mine is fitted to a NexStar 6SE, with SkyPortal installed on my Android phone. Setting up was slightly bumpy, as I found by trial and error that not all of the possible setup methods worked with my kit. However, one did work, so that's all I needed. There was also the occasional wifi dropoff, but I understand from Prof. Google that this may be due to the phone kicking me off if the screensaver closes the display. Suggested solutions here involve disabling certain memory/battery saver apps which could be causing this issue. next time I'm out I'll try disabling one app at a time to try & identify the culprit. I don't see this as a big issue, just something I need to look at.

Anyway, with the wifi running let's proceed to the alignment process. This is a three-star alignment (you can use planets if available), requiring you to centre an object in your spotterscope, then centre it in your observing eyepiece to align the scope (repeat for each of three objects). I used Vega, Capella and Mars, and the app reported a successful alignment. I then tried selecting various objects and getting the scope to track into position. The results were fairly accurate, though I think I need to tweak my Telrad spotter slightly to improve performance.

My only "con" is that it doesn't track objects (for example to take long exposures of DSO's) but I tend to restrict my astrophotography to the Moon and planets, so I'm not that bothered.  As I use video capture anyway, I suspect that a quick tap of the centring button will keep objects in view for sufficient time to grab loads of frames for processing.

One last thing - I find it easier to use the handset to move the scope in the alignment process. Just saying...

Alan S.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Matty_C
      Hello all,
      I have just joined and have been looking around, and putting in various searches to find the answer to my question(s).
      I have already found some valuable information, but i can't find a specific answer to a question i have relating to exposure times.
      I have shot the milky way several times before, from a tripod and a wide angle lens. I am aware of and understand the "500 rule" and that worked fine for me at first when i was shooting with my Canon 6D Mark II. When i moved over to the Sony A7III i noticed significant trailing using the same rule and that led me to the NPF rule (Via the photopills app incase people dot know).
      I am heading back to Tenerife once again in about 6 weeks time and want to buy a star tracker so i can get some really detailed images.
      I have done a fair bit of research and in principle, the whole thing doesn't seem to be too daunting or difficult.
      I have purchased the Polar Scope Align Pro app so i can align Polaris as accurately as possible, i will practise putting the unit together and familiarising myself with the different parts etc, but it is the exposure times that i do not understand.
      My best glass is the Carl Ziess 50mm F/1.4 Planar, the 18mm F/2.8 Batis, the Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Art & the IRIX 15mm F/2.4 Blackstone.
      I currently do not own, nor have i ever used a tracker, and I cannot find any information relating to which aperture, ISO and Shutter length any of these focal lengths should or could be shot at.
      Is there anything similar to the 500 rule or NPF rule that relates to using a tracker with varied focal lengths? or is it just a case of stepping the lens down for sharpness and then trial and error?
      Thanks in advance,
    • By Stargazer33
      Hi, this question has probably been done to death here, but can I ask the community to help me decide on a new camera?
      After struggling with my very glitchy QHY5LIIc camera for a while, as well as having a forced break from astronomy, I have decided to get a new camera. After all the problems I've been having with the QHY, I really don't want to use this manufacturer again. I know lots of people use them quite happily, but once bitten ...
      I have been looking at the ZWO cameras - OSC, as I haven't the time, clear skies, or patients to do LRGB imaging!
      I have about £250 to spend, which I may be able to push to £300 if I wait a bit. ? So I've been looking at the ASI224MC, ASI290MC and the ASI178MC cameras.
      I mainly do planetary/Luna imaging, but I have also dabbled in a bit of DSO and would like to continue with both. I have a C9.25 and a ST80 guide scope. I know these aren't ideal for DSOs but please humour me!
      I think from the specs/information that the 224 is probably the best option. Although the resolution and QE are the worst of the three, the well depth and read noise are the best and the fps is pretty good too.
      I don't know if there are better/cheaper cameras using the same chips, such as Altair's range. I just don't want to make the same mistake that I did with the QHY!n
      Any help/advice you can give will be much appreciated.?
    • By Galaxyfaraway
      This is maybe my 3rd attempt at a galaxy and I am trying to figure out the best way of doing it since I live in a red zone of London suburbs.
      I took this over 2 nights (well, 1.5 really, as my guiding wasn't working and plate solver wouldn't comply after meridian flip...) with my 8" EdgeHD SCT with 0.7x reducer and Atik 490X. Around 20 Luminance subs at 10 mins each  (1x1) and around 15 RGB subs at 5 mins each, but binned 2x2. I use Astrodon filters but also have an LP filter permanently in my image train. 
      Question: should I only use RGB and create a synthetic L channel, given LP, or continue trying with the actual luminance? Gradients are horrible with luminance but RGB doesn't have as much detail (only red filter seems to be more sensitive).
      My stars are all over the place (colours pop out everywhere, in the wrong way), how can I control this better?
      Also, as I wrote, the red filter seems to have much more detail than the rest and when I add all the channels into PS, the red colour just overpowers everything (and in general, how can I keep the star colours as they are and not have the red and blue go crazy - I am not sure the name for it, but it looks like chromatic aberration on steroids).
      Any other general tips would be great...
      Thank in advance. GFA
      PS: I cheated with the core: just changed the temperature to make it look a bit more glowy; for some reason, I barely had any yellow colour from the data...I will post stacked images, if of interest.
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys,im currently on a school trip and brought my celestron firstscope with, tonight we ll  be trying some dsos and maybe saturn and jupiter,the telescope itself is not collimated and dirty (on the mirrors)So I wanted to ask.in the scope, there is no primary adjustment screws,only the ones to take it off .Does that mean that its set , allowing me to take it off wash it and back on without having to recollimate the primary?
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys!i need to make this quick! I want to get a new 6mm eyepiece.I have a 8" f6 dob and i want to get a nice 200 mag and put the telescope to its limits at 400x
      The most i ve seen with is 240x for Jupiter and Saturn .i ve heard they looked stunning at 400x and i am keen on trying it.Ive got my eyes on a 6mm Skywatcher UWA eyepiece.and i have a Bst Starguider 2z Barlow lens.And i seem to be having problems with my 8mm Bst Starguider (300x in total).the bst has a 16mm eye relief and a 21mm lens diameter,but when i barlowed it and look at the moon yesterday,it was hard finding the right spot to look through the eyepiece and when i moved the image disappeared.I dont know if it will have that effect on planets,when I looked at mars it was fine but i definitely want to avoid that from happening again.Will it happen?
      The Skywatcher eyepiece i want to buy has a 16mm eye relief too.I dont want to make the same mistake now , i want a 6mm eyepiece at the price range of 50-70 euro either from flo or amazonuk.If the Skywatcher will have similar results,can you suggest another one?
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.