Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

To get started with imaging planets (with SW 150PDS)


Recommended Posts

What would be the most practical way to extend my visual-only rig (EQ5 + SW 150PDS) to do specifically planetary imaging:

* attach my Canon EOS 100D
* get a web camera
* get a color CCD camera or something similar

As far as I have understood correctly, I'd need a coma corrector, barlow lens and adapters in all options.

What is the practical focal length for planets? Is it impractical to try to reach those numbers with a relatively short OTA (f = 750mm).

Thanks a lot!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your camera has a 640x480 cropped video mode then you can start with that. The best device to use would be a dedicated lunar/planetary camera such as a QHY5 or ASI AS120. You will need a barlow lens (probably 4x / 5x) to get a good image scale but you won't need a coma corrector, you will only be imaging from the centre of the field of view so coma won't be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For planetary imaging you want a long focal length scope - something like a C9.25. This is what you would get with the ED80 and a 3X barlow lens and ASI120MC

so it just depends if that would be acceptable to you.

Peter

Capture.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it wasn't - I seem to have lost the details but I know it was with the ASI120MC and a 2X Barlow. If you compare it with the image generated by Astrotools you can see that it's been cropped a bit.

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎.‎3‎.‎2016 at 17:08, Cornelius Varley said:

If your camera has a 640x480 cropped video mode then you can start with that. The best device to use would be a dedicated lunar/planetary camera such as a QHY5 or ASI AS120. You will need a barlow lens (probably 4x / 5x) to get a good image scale but you won't need a coma corrector, you will only be imaging from the centre of the field of view so coma won't be a problem.

Thanks for a very clear answer. I did some math to find out the size of Jupiter in pixels when selecting the Barlow so that the sampling is optimal for the resolution of my scope.

--

CN has a formula for optimal focal length: FL(mm) = 3.6 x Pixel Size (microns) x Scope diameter (mm)

For 6" tube and suggested cameras (3,75um pixel size) the formula gives 2025 mm. A suitable barlow would thus be 3x (3x*750mm = 2250mm).

The vertical FoV would be (considering that the height of the 1/3" sensor is 3.6mm): FoV = 2 * atan (sensor size / FL / 2) = 5.5'

Considering the size of Jupiter just now (44.5") that would mean that the diameter of the disc of Jupiter on the image would be: 960 pixels / 5.5' * 44.5" = 130 pixels

Just makes me wonder if this is too small size to be appreciated (assuming that each pixel has information, i.e. capturing conditions and processing are perfect).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A £5 xbox webcam with a nose piece from astrooboot £4 (or make a nose cone from an old 35mm film canister for free ) will let you have a try, start with something then see where you want to go and how much more money you want to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.