Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Widefield Triple Imaging Rig


Gina

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm having a little rest from the construction of the rig itself and thinking about where I'm putting it.  My main plan is to use my NEQ6 and no.2 pier so working out how to protect it from the weather so that I can leave everything set up and ready to go.  I'm now thinking in terms of a mini observatory containing just the equipment and controlled remotely except for the initial setting up.

However, now that my second winch is no longer needed to pull a wheelchair up the steep ramps outside the house I can deploy it as a hoist in the main obsy to enable me to swap scopes or maybe put the widefield rig on the EQ8.  I will then have two 12v winches in the main obsy, one for the driving the roll off roof and the other as a hoist.  Removing the scopes and putting the WF imaging rig on the EQ8 would save time as I imagine it will take quite a while to build the mini obsy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been working on the mounting today.   The front frame needed a slight redesign to improve its strength but I'm now satisfied with it and the whole rig (less cameras) is mounted on the base plate and the dovetail fastened to the base plate.  I now have the whole rig mounted on my second pier outdoors.

Here are some photos.

post-13131-0-87817800-1411320723_thumb.jpost-13131-0-14643700-1411320728_thumb.jpost-13131-0-30967700-1411320733_thumb.j

And these shows it parked.

post-13131-0-29846900-1411320590_thumb.jpost-13131-0-28670800-1411321648_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about which system to use to control the triple focus stepper motors.  Previously I used an Arduino Mega and ULN2003A modules and I could do the same again OR I could use 1-wire chips and an Arduino Nano as I'm doing for my multi CCTV system for the pan & tilt controls.  I'll probably go for the tried and tested system :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the lens iris causes pointy stars I'm planning to reduce aperture with and external aperture mask.  This will consist of a plate in front of the lenses with 40mm holes in the case of the 200mm lenses giving a focal ratio of f5.  I think this will be sufficient to overcome the deficiencies of the lenses at full aperture.  It will be printed in black ABS as that is the only colour that is properly opaque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No lathe work today - not feeling up to it :(

But I have been working on this project - making up a guide system.  Trying a finder-guider using the lens out of the finder for the ST80 which has a focal length of 100mm, and the Lodestar.  The original finder tube is too long to use with the Lodestar so I've printed a new one with an adapter to fit in one end to take the lens and the Lodestar is a sliding fit in the other end.  I'll post some photos later when I've taken some :D

Tried the guider pointing at the fields and trees from my obsy and connected to the main USB hub.  Ran the Lodestar software to check and adjust focus but all I got was a blank frame :(  The USB light comes on and the software finds the camera but no image.  I'm worried now that the Lodestar may have developed a fault :(

There isn't much room to fit the guider without sticking out beyond the base.  There isn't room even for this slimline guider on the top so it will have to go on the undersdie of the mounting plate next to the NEQ6 jaws.

Actually, I'm not sure the lens from this finder will be of good enough quality and it's pretty small - about 25mm diameter.  The finder had a plastic iris about 8mm in from the lens of about 12mm diameter.  So this gives around f8.

Another possibility is a CCTV telephoto lens I have which is specified for a 1/3 inch sensor and has a 12mm CCTV thread.  Only problem may be that the lens is about 5mm and 50mm FL giving f10.  It has the advantage that it would be possible to fit this beside the turret on the top side of the mounting plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the best thing would be to redesign the turret to contain a guide system as well as the three imagers :eek:

OTOH maybe an OAG is the way to go - I have had great success with the OAG on my MN190 :)

EDIT...  No it isn't :(  The guide camera would stick out the side of the turret nstopping it from rotating :(

"Oh yes it is" - there is no need for the turret to turn 360 degrees - 180 (or less) would cover all requirements - images 180 degrees apart can be turned 180 degrees in the processing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right!  I think I shall see how the design for an OAG works out.

The £129 one FLO sell should do nicely and at that price it's hardly worthwhile making my own.  There's 19mm between the lens and imaging camera which I'm currently filling with an adapter from M42 1mm lens thread to T2 42mm x 0.75mm thread pitch.  So there should be room for lens to OAG adapter, OAG and filter holder, between lens and camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modelling in SketchUp.  Here are screenshots of the lens fitting and OAG plus the lens to OAG adapter from 2 angles.  The adapter will have an M42 x 1mm pitch inside thread to take the lens and an M48 external thread to fit into the OAG.  The filter would be screwed into an adapter that fits into the camera side of the OAG.

post-13131-0-01477900-1411599825.jpgpost-13131-0-10756200-1411599823.jpgpost-13131-0-02196700-1411599824.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gina im sure you have probably answerd this somewhere but how well do you find threads print?

I've had no success in printing the fine threads required for astro adapters.  Coarser threads do work but need high print resolution (small layer height).  I have reverted to metal (aluminium) rather than plastic for the precision adapters needed for astro imaging use.  Focus and sensor alignment are particularly crucial for short focal length optics such as camera lenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delrin is fine for things liek webcam adapters etc but it is good quality industril plastic and costs more than Ally, the advantage been its already black and does not need anodising so the finished product is in your hand and ready to go quicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the adapters for the widefield rig will be turned from aluminium and black anodised.  I think I may also need to make adapters for the ED80 triple imaging system as the spacing with the field flatteners is very critical.  Just depends if it works out that standard adpters fit the bill (unlikely).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an OVL OAG on it's way from FLO - should arrive tomorrow morning :)

The Lodestar guide camera is alright - I've tested it with PHD indoors on my desktop.  What the problem was with the obsy setup and laptop I don't know but this camera will be used with a different laptop (or the netbook) with the WF rig on the second pier.  If I set up the WF rig on the EQ8, I'll use the Lodestar X2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.