Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

NGC 7000 / NGC 6992 from last night


Roy

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I managed to get out last night for a couple of hours which was nice and grabbed a couple of images

Tracking wasn't great and focusing could have been better but at least it didn't rain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Philip, I should have said,

WO66SD

Guided with C9.25 and Atik-2HS

Captured with SXV-M7

Astronomic Ha filter

As I mentioned above, I'm not all that happy guiding with the C9.25 so I think I'm going to start using my ED80 instead.

Before I started using the Celestron I used an ED80 and easily managed to get 30 and 40 min exposures so I think I'll box up the C9.25 and get back to a widefield setup and see how I get on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all,

I managed to get out last night for a couple of hours which was nice and grabbed a couple of images ....

You really must get out more mate, if you're going to produce images this good. :police:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ya Martin,

To answer your question, I don't really know why I'm not having much luck with it, it may just be down to the FL of the scope and the FOV that gives but guide stars are not exactly in abundance if you know what I mean.

I'm not very good with the technical stuff, I'm more of a point shoot and hope for the best sort of bloke.

I used to use a cheap Antares 90mm refractor as a guidescope and that worked like a charm and I was able to achieve exposures of up to 30 Min's without to many problems which is why I'm swapping the C9.25 for the ED80.

To be honest I've only had the C9.25 for a short while but I'm not really getting on with, I kind of wish I'd bought A Nice 4" APO instead but that's always the way isn't it. :police:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you thought about a F/R with the C9.25. Your camera would probably be ok with the Meade 3.3 reducer cos the chip isn't too big. That would be one fast scope with a very handy focal length.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Martin,

That would be one option, I haven't tried it yet but I do have a 3.3 reducer but I need another sct to 2" adapter

I did have one on order from a well known retailer but that's another story :police:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.